Ron Paul: ‘Secession is a Deeply American Principle’
by Ian Smith |
The notion of individual state secession has gathered a lot of attention since residents of various states began petitioning the White House to allow their states to secede from the union. The petitions began after the recent election and have garnered many signatures; in some cases, the number of signatures obtained has been enough to trigger the automatic review and response the White House offers. (see Update on State Secession Movement – Will It Work?)
One of the states in the list of petitions that has gathered some of the most signatures is Texas. Texas Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), who is known for holding Libertarian viewpoints on issues, has recently responded to the secession petition movement in a post on his web site.
Is it treasonous to want to secede from the United States? Many think the question of secession was settled by our Civil War. On the contrary; the principles of self-governance and voluntary association are at the core of our founding. Clearly Thomas Jefferson believed secession was proper, albeit as a last resort. Writing to William Giles in 1825, he concluded that states:
“should separate from our companions only when the sole alternatives left, are the dissolution of our Union with them, or submission to a government without limitation of powers.”
Keep in mind that the first and third paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence expressly contemplate the dissolution of a political union when the underlying government becomes tyrannical.
Do we have a “government without limitation of powers” yet? The Federal government kept the Union together through violence and force in the Civil War, but did might really make right?
Secession is a deeply American principle. This country was born through secession. Some felt it was treasonous to secede from England, but those “traitors” became our country’s greatest patriots.
There is nothing treasonous or unpatriotic about wanting a federal government that is more responsive to the people it represents. That is what our Revolutionary War was all about and today our own federal government is vastly overstepping its constitutional bounds with no signs of reform. In fact, the recent election only further entrenched the status quo. If the possibility of secession is completely off the table there is nothing to stop the federal government from continuing to encroach on our liberties and no recourse for those who are sick and tired of it.
Paul ultimately concludes by saying:
In a free country, governments derive their power from the consent of the governed. When the people have very clearly withdrawn their consent for a law, the discussion should be over. If the Feds refuse to accept that and continue to run roughshod over the people, at what point do we acknowledge that that is not freedom anymore? At what point should the people dissolve the political bands which have connected them with an increasingly tyrannical and oppressive federal government? And if people or states are not free to leave the United States as a last resort, can they really think of themselves as free?
If a people cannot secede from an oppressive government, they cannot truly be considered free.
What is your opinion? Should states be allowed to secede if they feel the federal government is overreaching, or should states have to stay within the union at all times? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
© 2013 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This copyrighted article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.
by Ian Smith |