Search:

Custom Search

Photo of Ralph Smith

"Kerry for President" Stickers Create Problems for VA Employee

By Ralph Smith

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Political activity by federal employees that violates the Hatch Act continues to provide work for the Office of Special Counsel (OSC).

An employee of the Veterans Administration has admitted that he violated the Hatch Act during the last presidential election. OSC had filed a complaint with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) earlier this year  against Eric Foster, a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employee in Columbus, Ohio, for violating the Hatch Act.

He was charged with engaging in political activity while in a government room or building. OSC also alleged he engaged in this activity despite his knowledge of Hatch Act prohibitions.

The charges apparently had some merit as the VA employee admits that he distributed campaign stickers supporting John Kerry for President of the United States at a VA Clinic in Columbus, Ohio. Further, Mr. Foster admitted that his distribution of the campaign materials while in a federal facility violates the Hatch Act.

As a result, he agreed to retire from his position no later than September 5, 2006.

Special Counsel Scott Bloch said, “This case presents a cautionary tale. If you engage in political activity on government property or use government resources for partisan ends, OSC will prosecute.”

That appears to be the case as a number of cases have been taken against federal employees for Hatch Act violations in recent months. Some of the actions were against senior officials such as the case of a political appointee in Alaska, a lawyer with the Small Business Administration in California, a Navy employee working as a union official, and a veterinarian with the USDA--just to name a few.

As we near the Congressional elections this Fall, federal employees would be well advised to consult with their agency experts on Hatch Act activities before taking a deep plunge into politics that could end a rewarding federal career.


© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Despite my having supported Kerry for president, and despite my belief that I have pretty decent judgment, I thought your post was wicked funny! Must have had something to do with how direct the comment was....
    Posted: May 26, 2008 8:46 PM
  • Did it say anywhere that the manager was actually found guilty of anything, or only that the case was found in the other person's favor? This can mean several things, some of which find no blame on anyone, or find equal blame on both parties resulting in neither a loss nor a win. Finding 'in favor...
    Posted: May 25, 2008 6:38 PM
  • their actions. She went on "The spirit of the No-Fear law was that managers were to face major consequences as a result of findings of discrimination against them. These are not victimless crimes, and for someone to get slapped on the hand when you have violated someone's human and civil rights, you...
    Posted: May 7, 2008 9:40 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.