Search:

Custom Search

Potential for Violent Behavior Warrants Removal

By Susan Smith

Monday, March 19, 2007

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

A Philadelphia Tax Examining Clerk was unsuccessful in persuading the Federal Circuit to overturn her removal based on assaulting her neighbor, her conviction for the assault and for inappropriate behavior toward her supervisor. (Wormley v. Department of the Treasury, C.A.F.C. No. 2006-3413 (nonprecedential), 3/13/07) The facts are taken from the court’s opinion.

Wormley’s supervisor requested a meeting with her to discuss her performance. Wormley refused and “became belligerent” with the supervisor. Meanwhile, during a routine background investigation of Wormley, the agency discovered that she had been arrested and convicted of assault for biting off a portion of her neighbor’s thumb during an argument. (Opinion, p. 2)

The agency removed Wormley based on the three instances of misconduct as well as taking into account three other instances of misbehavior in her work record.

Wormley appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board. She did not dispute the first two instances of misconduct involving the assault on her neighbor and her conviction for that assault. She took issue with the third specification of misconduct involving her confrontation with her supervisor. However, the administrative judge found that the agency had proved its case and that Wormley’s removal promoted the efficiency of the service and was a reasonable penalty. (p. 3)

Wormley appealed to the Federal Circuit. She argued, among other things, that the agency should not have used her past work record in determining the penalty. The court disagreed. As for her argument that removal was not an appropriate penalty, the court had this to say: “The Board correctly found that the removal penalty was reasonable considering Ms. Wormley’s potential for behaving violently and that her job involved working in close proximity to her co-workers and dealing personally with the general public.” (p. 4)

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • This is a case of poor management and supervision. In this case when they supervisor realized this individual had a problem with violent and/or behavior (at that point the supervisor and manager should have ensure that all conversations were in the presents of witnesses especially about performanc...
    Posted: March 22, 2007 2:40 PM
  • A non-supervisory co-worker has no authority to reprimand you. Don't go to his/her office....
    Posted: March 22, 2007 7:39 AM
  • If you are being called into another co-workers space or private place without your supervisor or lead or anyone else present and you are being verbally reprimanded what reprocussions do you have, it seems like any whistleblowing, consistant meetings with your supervisor do not change anything and m...
    Posted: March 21, 2007 10:12 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY SUSAN SMITH

Contact Susan Smith or read more articles on the author's page.