Search:

Custom Search

Photo of John Grobe

Should You Get a Survivor Annuity or Purchase Life Insurance?

By John Grobe

Monday, August 20, 2007

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

John Grobe is a retired federal employee with over 25 years of experience in federal human resources and President of Federal Career Experts, a training and consulting firm that specializes in federal employee retirement and career transition issues.

Should I get a survivor annuity or purchase life insurance? This is a question that many prospective retirees ask.  Though no one can give a definitive answer to this question, there are several things that one should consider in making this important decision.

One reason employees consider replacing a survivor annuity with life insurance is that survivor benefits "pay off" only if the annuitant dies before the designated survivor.  If the designated survivor dies first, the money that was withheld from the annuity to provide for the survivor benefit was spent for nothing.  With life insurance, if the beneficiary dies before the policyholder, the policyholder can simply change the beneficiary.

When looking at considerations, health insurance should be considered first.  If a retiree wants his/her spouse to be able to continue enrollment in the Federal Employees' Health Benefit Program if the retiree die before the spouse, a survivor annuity must be elected.  Given the cost of health insurance, this alone is enough to make most retirees choose some type of survivor annuity.  Reduced survivor annuities can be elected under both CSRS and FERS.  Health insurance availability, of course, is not a consideration if the retiree is part of a federal "couple" or in any other situation where the spouse is entitled to post-retirement health insurance in their own right.

Secondly, an analysis should be done of the pros and cons of life insurance versus a survivor annuity.  For example:

  1. If there is a likelihood of the survivor living long after the death of the retiree, then it is likely that a survivor annuity would be the best choice.  In a situation where the retiree lived 15 years and the spouse lived an additional 15 years, the amount of income derived from the survivor benefit would likely be much more than the amount that would have been derived from investing the death benefit and taking payments.
  2. f there were a lesser likelihood of the survivor living for a long time after the death of the retiree, perhaps a life insurance policy would make more sense.  If the retiree lived 28 years and the survivor only lived another two years, the survivor would not even have recouped the amount of money that the deceased retiree had paid for the survivor annuity.  The death benefit of life insurance, when invested at a reasonable rate, would provide a stream of income better than that which would have been provided by a survivor annuity.


If you are trying to determine how long the survivor might live after the retiree's death, here are some considerations in attempting to determine the relative life expectancy of the parties.


If life expectancy does not give a clear answer to the survivor annuity versus life insurance question, there are a few other things to consider:

  1. The rating of the insurance company; and
  2. The reliability of the agent.

If you decide on purchasing insurance, you should look at:

Do be aware that not all insurance policies are created equal and be sure to ask as many questions as you need in order to fully understand the benefits of the policy you are considering.

As you can see, the answer to the question of survivor annuity versus life insurance depends on each individual's situation.  Retirees may wish to consult with a financial advisor when making this decision and other decisions that can affect their retirement income. 

© 2008 John Grobe. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from John Grobe.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • I am retiring next January and my husband is 9 years younger than me. I am concerned that we may not have enough to pay our monthly bills. We will sell our condo and move to a place where we can purchase a house and then have no mortgage. His earning potential is very low. The jobs that he can get d...
    Posted: April 25, 2008 7:23 AM
  • The military retirees, age 70 or over who have contributed to annuity plan for at least 30 years will not be required to pay premiums starting in 2008. What about me! I started paying annuity premiums when I retired from the USN, then after 18 year stint as a letter carrier I combined the two reti...
    Posted: March 4, 2008 12:18 PM
  • As 2 CSRS fed employees to retire in the near future, is there any benefit to electing survivor annuity(ies)? We are of similar age, health, grade/step, and married to each other....
    Posted: November 17, 2007 12:22 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY JOHN GROBE

More »