Search:

Custom Search

Does Federal Employment Equate to Military Service?

By Susan Smith

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

If you petition the Merit Systems Protection Board to overturn removal based on violation of USERRA (Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994), it's probably a good idea to be able to prove that you actually did serve in the military. In Burnett v. Merit Systems Protection Board, C.A.F.C. No. 2007-3232 (nonprecedential), 10/22/07, a fired USPS mail handler from Houston, Texas, learned this the hard way.

Burnett was fired based on a false workers' compensation claim. She appealed to the Board. Belatedly, she tried to add a claim that her removal violated USERRA, which prohibits discrimination based on an employee's military service and provides an appeal right to the Board.

The Administrative Judge, pointing out that Burnett's file had no evidence of military service, directed her to submit a DD-214 or some other evidence of her military service. She did not cough up the evidence. Meanwhile, the Postal Service submitted personnel file documents showing that she had no military service obligation, nor any evidence of past military service. The AJ dismissed Burnett's appeal for lack of jurisdiction under USERRA, and the full Board opted not to review the dismissal. (Opinion p. 2)

Burnett took her case to court. Some might call her argument creative; others might call it wasting a court's time. In any case, she did not dispute that she had no military service. Instead, she argued that USERRA applies to federal employees who suffered an injury or disability "in the line of duty," equating "duty" with federal employment. Hence, if you are a federal employee, you have the right to appeal under USERRA. (p. 3)

Patiently explaining that USERRA appeals are only available to those federal employees who actually meet the military service test, the court wasted little ink in affirming the Board's dismissal of Burnett's case. (p. 3)

© 2008 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • When I am subject to being shot at during a normal day's work I will consider Federal employment equal to military service. Not before!...
    Posted: November 7, 2007 9:27 AM
  • I 100% concur with the veteran from SSA. National Security works WITHIN our Borders...even if they are deployed the worst case scenerio would put them in the confines of the USA. Shopping malls, services, Dining, Unrestricted travel & good lodgeing would either be available at the site to whi...
    Posted: November 1, 2007 8:05 PM
  • It might not be convenient, but they still have an option - they can always say, "No!" I'll agree with you if/when federal employees from any branch are: - purposely placed in harm's way, - moving every 18 months, - relocating their families on a shoestring budget, - separated from thei...
    Posted: November 1, 2007 6:24 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY SUSAN SMITH

More »