Search:

Custom Search

Frequent Trading in the TSP

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

by William E. Donoghue

Chairman, W. E. Donoghue & Co. Inc. and contributing columnist and Editor, The Proactive Fund Advisor with Bill Donoghue at www.marketwatch.com.

______________

As a thirty-year advocate of objective, patient and profitable proactive fund investing, I would like to add some alternative perspectives to consider in your discussions of frequent trading.

1. Buy-and-Hold is Not Good Enough.

As a long-term benchmark, the S&P 500 has averaged 1.8% this Century (since the end of 1999). While others have chosen other time periods, this eight year period recognizes the full bear and bull cycle to date. The mutual fund public relations machine has convinced many journalists who don't manage money and load fund advisors to focus on costs and not on the funds unwillingness to add value by addressing down market opportunities.

Investors Should Make Their Own Choice. Passive investors have their beliefs, mostly promoted by Vanguard's John Bogle; the rare experienced proactive advisors who do manage separate accounts know that some objective trading is more than appropriate.

2. We Have Enough Investment Extremists; We Don't Need More.

Both Day Traders (so-called "market timers") and Passive Investing have troubling costs.

Too frequent daily trading tends to be unfair to fellow investors and to take advantage of unintended accounting anomalies; passive investing without a net is just as frightening without an inverse stock alternative to profit in the face of a probable two-three year downturn. The 2000-2002 bear market cost retirement savers as much as $6 trillion. Cash is just not a good enough alternative to build retirement assets and even encourage savers to "stay the course." It was a long wait from 2000 to 2007 before investors finally broke even. If they retired in the interim, the likelihood that their savings will last their remaining life is lowered.

3. Remember It's Your Money and Your Peers' Money.

With all due respect, TSP's Board should be proud to have taken a bold and rare initiative empowering investors to trade among TSP's funds. The "independent" mutual fund directors have not been so sensitive to shareholder needs.

The TSP is A Revolutionary Plan; But, It's Still Incomplete. TSP is an excellent traditional retirement program with some unique portfolios; you should be proud to have access to it. However, it needs an inverse fund alternative.

Two trades a month is probably a "good enough" middle ground; however in exchange for accepting this restriction, TSP should take the leadership and offer you a bear market stock alternative (inverse fund) to profit during a bear market.

Rydex and ProFunds, the rare experienced fund families offering such funds and ETFs and are both conveniently located in the DC area. You don't have to use the alternative but you should want it available.

4. Get Thee To A Roth IRA.

A convenient path to a Roth IRA conversion to at least allow you to shelter your future profits should be offered. If you get laid off and/or have a low-income tax rate year, that year might be a good time to convert your IRA to a Roth IRA. The income and age test that restrict these conversions should be waived ASAP. I suspect the Treasury could do that on their own or modify rules to facilitate conversions.

5. Three Things To Keep Clearly In Mind: (1) Your principal and profit, if any, will eventually be taxed as ordinary income when you retire – no tax-preferred long-term capital gains rates or dividend exclusion rules; hence, the Roth IRA conversion recommendation, Tax-deferred is not tax-free and (2) You should demand an inverse stock fund alternative (in the event we face an extended bear market) and (3) this generation, the best-educated generation in human history, should not be treated as investment illiterates and empowered to manage their money as professionals.

6. A Taxable Fund Might Be A Better After-Tax Alternative.

ETFs make proactive management economical and their ability to "trade like a stock" makes them viable as trading vehicles. Taxable ETF portfolio might produce superior after-tax returns.

My best New Year wishes,
William E. Donoghue

© 2008 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • It amazes me how the VERY MOST important issues are never discussed at FedSmith. The single MOST IMPORTANT issue to TSP members is the timing requirement for placing changes to their asset allocations. Currently, it is 12:00 p.m. EST. Sometimes, if you are not at least an hour early the trade will m...
    Posted: February 6, 2008 9:33 AM
  • And, as the TSP board keeps pimping L-Funds, more and more folks are going to park their money in the L-Funds. If that happens the daily trading volume due to the L-funds will go up (possibly substantially). At some point its possible the L-Funds could increase costs substantially, and provide med...
    Posted: January 18, 2008 1:25 AM
  • Excellent article!! Unfortunately I seriously doubt the TSP Board would even consider any of your suggestion.. but we can always hope. We need more choices (like an SH Fund), we need to be given the responsibility to manage our own money! We need to keep the responsibility of manageing our...
    Posted: January 18, 2008 12:59 AM

View All Comments »