Search:

Custom Search

Photo of John Grobe

Future Retirees: Do You Know Your MRA?

By John Grobe

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

John Grobe is a retired federal employee with over 25 years of experience in federal human resources and President of Federal Career Experts, a training and consulting firm that specializes in federal employee retirement and career transition issues.

The FERS 5% penalty for those who choose to retire under the provision for MRA+10 retirement is often the source of confusion.  This penalty reduces the FERS annuity of a retiree who elects to retire under the MRA+10 provision by 5/12 of 1% per month (5% per year) for each full month the retiree is younger than age 62.

For those who are not familiar with the term MRA – you are probably CSRS.  MRA is a concept that was introduced with the advent of the FERS system and does not apply to CSRS employees. Your MRA, or Minimum Retirement Age, is based on the year in which you were born. A FERS retiree who was born before 1948 would have a MRA of 55. However, if  born in 1970 or later, the MRA would be 57. 

Here is a chart that demonstrates how this works:

Minimum Retirement Age +10
Year of Birth MRA
Before 1948 55
1948 55 and 2 months
1949 55 and 4
1950 55 and 6
1951 55 and 8
1952 55 and 10
1953-1964 56
1965 56 and 2
1966 56 and 4
1967 56 and 6
1968 56 and 8
1969 56 and 10
1970 and later 57



First and foremost, the 5% penalty only applies to FERS retirees who leave under the MRA+10 provision.  FERS employees who are under age 62 and retire under other provisions face no reduction at all.  Examples of the other provisions being:

The first three bullets above are sometimes referred to as "voluntary retirement".

There is a way that some individuals who leave under the MRA+10 provision are able to avoid the penalty.  This method, however, is not for everybody, as it required that you postpone the receipt of your annuity and give up some other retiree perks for a period of time.  Here's how it would work. 

Let's say you are age 60, neither disabled nor a special category employee, and have 15 years of service, but you really want to leave government service.  As you need a full 20 years of service to qualify for voluntary retirement, 15 years won't get you out the door unless you apply for MRA+10 retirement.  When your MRA+10 retirement is approved, you tell the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that you wish to postpone receiving your annuity.  Upon reaching age 62, you contact OPM again and ask them to start your annuity.  Because you are age 62 when the annuity begins, there will be no reduction in your annuity amount.

But wait, there's more!  Well, actually, there's really less.  Here are some reasons that the MRA+10 option is not more popular than it is (other than the fact you'll not be receiving an annuity for two years).

CSRS employees do not have anything like MRA+10 available.  If the person in the example used above were a CSRS employee, they would have to wait until age 62 to be eligible for retirement.

 

© 2008 John Grobe. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from John Grobe.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • A am covered by FERS and I'm 50 years old with 20 years of service. My MRA is 56. If I work until I am 56 & choose MRA+10, I will be penalizied 5% of each year under age 62, however if I am removed (fired) for poor performance, there is NO 5% penalty. Is this correct?...
    Posted: July 18, 2008 7:32 PM
  • The expert at FedWeek is reporting that the 5% under 62 penalty is impacted by service years. So, if a person has over 20 years of service, then the 5% reduction is only for under age 60 versus under age 62. Is this something fairly recently amended, or is the FedWeek writer incorrect? thank you....
    Posted: July 15, 2008 10:32 AM
  • What I don't understand I have 1 2/2 years before retirement (53 now), so in order for me to retire no on can tell me exactly what must I do to prepare for it. I having been putting money into FERS so I will lose 5% and that is because I have an IRA and invested money - so mo problem, so why is it ...
    Posted: June 16, 2008 10:23 AM

View All Comments »

 HTML  Text

MORE BY JOHN GROBE

More »