Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

The Aging--and Retiring--Federal Workforce

By Ralph Smith

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

If you were a big fan of the Beatles singing "I Want to Hold Your Hand"; you remember President Kennedy addressing the nation during the Cuban missile crisis; and you recall seeing Governor George Wallace standing in the door at the University of Alabama to block integration of the public school system on a black and white television set, you are older than most Americans. But many federal employees do recall these events because they were alive, and old enough to remember when they occurred.

The early baby boomers turned 18 about 1964 and many of them started working for the federal government in the 1960's and early 1970's. These long time federal employees are now entering their 6th decade. Many are in leadership positions in federal agencies.

That is a problem. Increasingly, we are hearing phrases such as: "Brain drain" or "retirement tsunami" being used to describe the current state of federal employment.

One observer of Uncle Sam's current state is the Partnership for Public Service. The organization is waving a verbal red flag to try and get the attention of Congress and the public about the gray-haired federal employee population—many of whom will decide to walk out the door and head for the beach, the golf course or a mountain retreat in the near future. And, when they walk out the door of the federal building and turn in their employee ID card, who will be there to accomplish the multiplicity of jobs performed by Uncle Sam's civilian army?

So how bad is the impending "retirement tsunami"?

The Partnership says that by 2012, federal agencies will lose about 530,000 employees. As one might expect from older employees, many of these folks are in leadership positions. Moreover, while the federal government's "reinvention" initiative of the 1990's reduced the size of the federal workforce by nearly 400,000 positions and left agencies with critical skills gaps.

 

 

Part of the problem, and one that our readers have previously identified, is that the federal hiring process is slow, inefficient and sometimes indecipherable to anyone who may be interested in becoming a federal employee. And, while those within government are often aware of the important role of the federal government, the public perception of government employment sometimes resembles a Dilbert cartoon in the minds of the prospective employees.

The government also has several arguments that attract new employees. Americans see federal jobs as being much more secure than those in the private sector and the benefits are often comparable or better than in private companies. (See "Uncle Sam as an Employer: Attractive Prospects But Execution is Questionable")

The Partnership says that several things have to happen within agencies:

As one of our authors pointed out recently in "A Shift Will Happen in the Future," attitudes about older employees are changing and many retirees from private industry will want to work for the government--if only to take advantage of the health benefits or the Thrift Savings Plan offered to federal employees.

But the reality of aging isn't going to go away. Our nation's government needs to attract and to hire college graduates. Look for changes in benefits or new legislation to make it easier to hire new people as the problem becomes more acute.

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • When people are hired at colleges and universities, their sick and annual leave are front-loaded. Mid-career hires have many demands on their time, children or aging parents. Earning just four hours of sick land annual leave each pay period in the early years of service, is an extreme disadvantage...
    Posted: October 29, 2008 11:40 AM
  • The younger generation is coming in behind the old and they have no idea what is going on inside the federal government. Our in coming new veterans need more experienced federal workers helping with the new recruits to help our veterans get through this time in their lives. So don't be in a hu...
    Posted: July 8, 2008 5:43 PM
  • When I retired in 2004, management couldn't wait to get us out the door. Then they realized that it was us that had all the experience and was processing all the work. The college graduates that they hired at the top had all the degrees but no idea about how the work was processed. By the time Centr...
    Posted: June 4, 2008 1:51 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.