Search:

Custom Search

Not Eligible to Retire? What Happens if You Create New Data for Your Retirement Application?

By Susan Smith

Monday, September 15, 2008

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

A Department of Energy engineer in Aiken, South Carolina, tried unsuccessfully to persuade the appeals court to overturn a settlement agreement that required him to leave the agency. (Salazar v. Department of Energy, C.A.F.C. No. 2008-3186 (nonprecedential), 9/5/08) The Merit Systems Protection Board wouldn't hear the case, and the appeals court now sides with the Board. The facts are taken from the court's decision.

DOE initiated removal against Salazar when it learned he had given false personal information to the agency regarding his qualifications and country of birth. Salazar proposed that the agency let him retire instead of removing him, and the agency agreed. The settlement let Salazar stay on until he became eligible for early retirement. He followed through with a retirement application that listed his birth date as January 30, 1954. It was approved and he retired. (Opinion, p. 2)

Several months later, Salazar was indicted for false statements, including listing this birth date on his retirement application when in fact he was born in 1958, which was 4 years after his proclaimed birth date. He was convicted and OPM terminated his retirement annuity since he did not meet the age requirement. (pp. 2-3)

Salazar appealed to the MSPB arguing that the agency had breached the settlement agreement since it violated a provision to keep the matter confidential by blowing the whistle on him to government prosecutors. The Board concluded that he did not show breach and the appeals court now agrees. Here's the court's take: As the Board correctly concluded, any confidentiality provision in the settlement agreement could not prohibit the agency, as a matter of public policy, from reporting Salazar's misconduct to the appropriate authority for prosecution." (p. 4) Further, since he was not really eligible to retire in the first place, he is in no position to complain about any breach by the agency. (p. 4)
 

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Folks, please remember: HR doesn't allow someone to stay in a position, any more than they fire someone. That's up to management. And HR will be in trouble if they insinuate to anyone that management wouldn't let the person go. Hence the "mistake" cover-up story....
    Posted: September 17, 2008 11:23 AM
  • I am glad he didn't get away with this. If he had, it is likely that others would have followed his lead. Somehow, I would like to believe that all employees who represent the U.S. government are honest, but the real world has gone in a very different direction from what I recall in my youth. I...
    Posted: September 17, 2008 10:36 AM
  • Well, there could be any number of valid explantions why being foreign born (at least that seems to be the implication) would not be an impediment since valid citizenship is entirely possibe. Not bothering to get your place and date of birth correct (hey, in Chicago the father of one of the Alderm...
    Posted: September 17, 2008 9:46 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY SUSAN SMITH

Contact Susan Smith or read more articles on the author's page.