Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Pay Raise? What Pay Raise? Why Some Will See a Decrease in Income in 2009

By Ralph Smith

Sunday, November 2, 2008

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Most federal employees are undoubtedly looking forward to an average pay raise of 3.9% beginning in January. (Here are the estimated 2009 federal pay rates.) Some federal retirees are probably even happier about their 5.8% cost of living increase that will start in January.

But there are several factors that may take away this temporary euphoria for the majority of readers.

For some federal employees, there is an even bigger hit. More than 7100 federal employees are under a pay cap. In 2008, this cap is $149,000. These folks are getting hit with more expenses but will not be getting a pay increase. The number impacted will go higher in January 2009 when the new pay raise is effective.

We occasionally see comments from readers to the effect of "What are they complaining about? I make a lot less than $149,000 and I get by so they can too."

That may be true. But that is not likely to have a calming affect on the higher graded employees who are at the pay cap. In theory, and generally in practice, those employees with a higher grade have more responsibility, have worked hard to get to where they are in the federal bureaucracy, and have demonstrated a combination of intelligence, hard work and political savvy to move to a job that pays at least $149,000. The fact that lower graded employees make less while the employee making more money sees his or her retirement income and purchasing power dwindling away is not going to make most of these folks feel better about the situation.

The pay cap is not new. Some federal employees in areas such as San Francisco have been feeling the impact of the pay cap going back several years now. Over the length of a typical lengthy of time in retirement for most federal employees, this will mean a loss of more than $100,000 in retirement income. That is because the pay cap also has an impact on computing retirement income as well as an employee's current salary.

In 2009, the pay cap will be just over $153,000. For example, in 2009, based on our projected pay raise for federal employees, an employee in the Washington, DC area will hit the pay cap as a GS-15, Step 10. In San Francisco, the pay cap will impact an employee as a GS 15, Step 6. In Houston, it will impact a GS-15, Step 8. With the median federal employee salary for the Washington, DC area now sitting at about $91,000, there will be a number of federal employees in Washington who may be eating out less, working longer, and getting more unhappy. Some in this situation are possibly wondering why they should take on the extra responsibility and the extra headaches of a higher graded job and not get paid for it.

Chances are, the problem will get worse. The Executive Pay Schedule is used to determine the GS pay cap. Under federal law, GS salaries are capped at Level IV of the Executive Schedule. Typical jobs at this level often include  assistant secretaries and chief management officers among others.

This state of affairs has not gone unnoticed by impacted interest groups. The Federal Manager's Association recently expressed its dissatisfaction and its analysis of the situation this way: ""This unfortunate and unfair situation has the potential to deeply impact the federal government's ability to function and could lead to higher costs to taxpayers due to unnecessary inefficiencies. This system must be reformed so that we no longer punish our high-level managers. We must do what we can to retain these employees who possess needed experience and knowledge."

So far, there has not been an outcry of indignation in Congress over the plight of those impacted by the pay cap. But, it's an election year and anything can happen. If you have reached or are going to reach the pay cap this year,  don't plan on a change coming in the near future. And, as pointed out above, the situation is likely to get worse before it gets better. Perhaps you can console yourself that some of our elected officials will consider you "wealthy" and, even more important, there is the security of knowing you still have a good-paying job (even if the pay is capped).

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • So what is the big deal??? Senator Obama probably thinks $149,000 is almost considered, "rich." Wait until he dismantles the current tax laws and goes back to the 1990 laws. That $250,000 figure that has been bantered around ends up actually being closer to $188,000 when the 1990 laws are applied...
    Posted: December 2, 2008 2:54 PM
  • Think about all Federal employees as I've complained before that certain Federal employees (Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, etc) don't get locality Pay and our COLA is declining. We retire on a lot less then employees in the lower 48 (as Alaskan's call it) and we've gotten less yearly raises as part of the 3...
    Posted: November 14, 2008 9:52 AM
  • “Program Analyst”, you have to look deeper than an SNL skit to see the truth. You have to do more than parrot vague generalities and lace your words with insults if you wish to have a rational discussion. What you fail to grasp is that the financial crisis has it’s roots in the Carter administrati...
    Posted: November 5, 2008 8:27 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.