Search:

Custom Search
Photo of John Grobe

IRAs and Your Retirement

By John Grobe

Friday, January 30, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

John Grobe is a retired federal employee with over 25 years of experience in federal human resources and President of Federal Career Experts, a training and consulting firm that specializes in federal employee retirement and career transition issues.

In a January article dealing with the topic of minimum required distributions (MRDs) (See Taxes and Your 2009 TSP Distributions: How To Lower Your Taxes), I mentioned traditional deductible and non-deductible Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) a few times. This article differentiates between the different types of IRAs that are available and the requirements for investing in them. We will look at the three types of IRA in the order of their appearance on the retirement investing scene.

First on the scene (in the 1970s) was what is today referred to as a traditional deductible IRA. To contribute to a traditional deductible IRA, you must have earned income and be under the age of 70 ½. In a traditional deductible IRA:

BUT WAIT! You cannot deduct IRA contributions (i.e., you cannot contribute to a traditional deductible IRA) if your income is over certain levels and you belong to a retirement plan through your employer (as all federal employees do).

If your filing status is single you can fully fund a traditional deductible IRA if your income is below $55,000; you may partially fund it if your income is between $55,000 and $65,000; you may not fund it at all if your income is over $65,000.

If your filing status is joint and your spouse also belongs to a retirement plan at work you can fully fund a traditional deductible IRA if your income is below $89,000; you may partially fund it if your income is between $89,000 and $109,000; you may not fund it at all if your income is over $109,000.

If your filing status is joint and your spouse does not belong to a retirement plan at work you can fully fund a traditional deductible IRA if your income is below $166,000; you may partially fund it if your income is between $166,000 and $176,000; you may not fund it at all if your income is over $176,000.

In 1986 the traditional non-deductible IRA appeared. To contribute to a traditional non-deductible IRA, you must have earned income and be under the age of 70 ½. In a traditional non-deductible IRA:

There are no income limits on contributing to a traditional non-deductible IRA.

The mid-90s brought us the Roth IRA. It has several differences from the traditional IRAs that may be to your advantage if you meet the income restrictions. To contribute to a Roth IRA you must have earned income, but can be of any age. In a Roth IRA

BUT WAIT! There are income restrictions on contributing to a Roth IRA.

If your filing status is single you can fully fund a Roth IRA if your income is below $105,000; you may partially fund it if your income is between $105,000 and $120,000; you may not fund it if your income is over $120,000.

If your filing status is joint you can fully fund a Roth IRA if your income is below $166,000; you may partially fund it if your income is between $166,000 and $176,000; you may not fund it if your income is over $176,000.

You may convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA if your income is below $100,000 (either single or joint filing status). The $100,000 income limit expires in 2010.

Note: The income restrictions listed for traditional deductible and Roth IRAs are for 2009. The 2008 amounts are lower and can be found on the IRS website, or in IRS publication 590. You have until April 15, 2009 to contribute to a 2008 IRA.
 

© 2009 John Grobe. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from John Grobe.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • I was 62 and retired under FERS on 12/31/05 and received my PP26 and lump sum payment for 400+ hours of annual leave on 01/18/06. Since it was paid and taxed in 2006, it was considered earned income in 2006 and I put the maximum, $5,000, into an IRA for 2006. If you are on Social Security, be sure...
    Posted: February 27, 2009 3:32 AM
  • Retired on 12/31/08 under FERS with 20+ years and >60 years age and married filing jointly-paid for last pay period (earned income in 2008) on 9 Jan 09. They included (and taxed) my lump sum vacation payment, under Current Earnings on my LES. The lump sum payment of vacation is considered a Specia...
    Posted: February 25, 2009 4:06 PM
  • Al Capone, no wonder this country is in so much trouble....
    Posted: February 23, 2009 10:43 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY JOHN GROBE

Contact John Grobe or read more articles on the author's page.