Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Susan Smith

Misuse of Travel Card, AWOL and Failing to Follow Leave Procedures Leads to Removal

By Susan Smith

Friday, February 6, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Susan McGuire Smith spent most of her 26-year federal government career with NASA, first at NASA Headquarters Office of General Counsel and then at Marshall Space Flight Center, serving as Chief Counsel there for more than 14 years. Her expertise is in government contracts, ethics, and personnel law. Ms. Smith has a J.D and a B.A. degree from the George Washington University. Her publications include Practical Ethics for the Federal Employee.

A Department of Education employee, fired for misusing government funds and absence without approved leave (AWOL), was not able to convince the appeals court to order her reinstated. (Stribling v. Department of Education, C.A.F.C. No. 2008-3336 (nonprecedential), 2/5/09) The facts are as outlined in the court's decision.

Stribling was a secretary in the agency's Philadelphia Office of Student Aid. She was officially transferred to Washington, D.C. and given an agency credit card to cover her relocation expenses. She continued to use the card for three weeks beyond the expiration of her travel authorization to pay for housing and other expenses. (Opinion pp. 1-2)

Stribling also failed to report for work after her move, telling her supervisor she has suffered a medical emergency and asking for unpaid leave. Leave was granted for a specific period of time, conditioned upon Stribling furnishing medical documentation. She did not provide the documentation and the supervisor gave her an order to report for work on a date certain. Stribling did not report on that date and made no effort to contact her supervisor to request leave. She showed up about 3 weeks after the date certain. (p 2)

The agency removed Stribling on charges of AWOL, failure to follow required leave request procedures, and misuse of a government travel card. The Merit Systems Protection Board held a hearing and concluded that the agency had proved all three charges. The Board affirmed Stribling's removal. (p. 2)

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals declined to overturn Stribling's removal, finding "nothing that contradicts the Board's findings." (p. 3)

As for Stribling's affirmative defense of retaliation for whistleblowing, the court points out that the alleged whistleblowing occurred 2 years before her removal. Further, it involved the Philadelphia office. As the court explained, "Stribling neither explained at the Board nor explains on appeal how her disclosures concerning managers in the Philadelphia office could have been the cause of her termination two years later by different managers in the Washington, D.C. office." (p. 5)

Bottom line: Stribling's removal stands.
 

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • What a JOKE! Everyone that's been in the government any length of time know good and well that retaliations crosses all boundaries. This lady worked for the same agency in one state, transferred to the same agency in another state. It is clear managers in the agency all over the nation know each...
    Posted: February 11, 2009 10:03 PM
  • I have to say, I might have also been tempted to charge what she did to a gov't card issued for a move as I would have considered these charges associated with a PCS move. However, it sounds like her new office was willing to work with her on the leave but just required documentation. This seems r...
    Posted: February 6, 2009 5:28 PM
  • This is standard defense for every CS, I'm a whistle blower. Then we have people posting and saying that MSPS and EEO doesn't help, because they win less than 2% of their cases. All this shows how frivolous all these filings are...
    Posted: February 6, 2009 5:01 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY SUSAN SMITH

Contact Susan Smith or read more articles on the author's page.