Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Paid Parental Leave Bill for Federal Employees Passes in House of Representatives

By Ralph Smith

Friday, June 5, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

An Oklahoma Congressman says that the bill to provide paid parental leave for federal employees sends the wrong message. The bill will reportedly cost about $850 million over a five year period. But, if the Congressman's contention about sending the wrong message is true, the House of Representatives isn't too concerned.

By a vote of 258 to 154, the House of Representatives has passed the Paid Parental Leave Bill for the second time in two years. The bill did not pass in the Senate last year so it did not become a new law.

As we noted in a related article shortly before the vote on the bill, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) proposed an amendment to the bill that would have provided leave to federal employees only after they have used up all their accrued leave. Issa's amendment also would require employees to have to repay any additional paid parental leave at a later time.

Issa noted a Bureau of Labor Statistics study that shows government benefits rose three times more than those in the private sector last year and that public employees are earning an average $13.38 per hour in benefits compared to $7.98 for private sector workers. He also noted that federal employees already receive five more paid vacation days per year than the average American worker.

A primary sponsor of the bill, Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) did not address the cost factor but said after passage of the bill that "As more families are relying on just one paycheck in these times, we can't afford not to help them in this way. The federal government should join the majority of the private sector-- including 75 of the Fortune 100-- by enacting workplace policies that invest in employees and their children."

She also noted that federal employees do not receive leave specifically for the birth of a new child. "If they (federal employees) have a new child and want paid time off, they have to cobble together accrued sick days and vacation time."

The purpose of the new bill is to provide more money for federal employees when having a child. The new bill states that its purpose is "To provide that 4 of the 12 weeks of parental leave made available to a Federal employee shall be paid leave...."

Moreover, the paid parental leave "shall not be considered to be annual or vacation leave...." The bill also provides that the leave does not accumulate for future use.

If the bill passes in the Senate, it already has the support of the Obama administration. The Office of Management and Budget wrote in a statement of administration policy: "The Federal government should reflect its commitment to these core values by helping Federal employees to care for their families as well as serve the public. Providing paid parental leave has been successfully employed by a number of private-sector employers, and can help to make job opportunities accessible to more workers."

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • ......and as for the abuse, not everyone who uses AL is abusing it. We work for those precious hours of AL, and it's our right to use them. I'm not saying that one should go willy-nilly and call in every other day, and take and extended weekend a couple times a month, but it is no sin to take a mu...
    Posted: September 14, 2009 11:27 AM
  • I agree with you. My husband and I planned on never having kids (he already had 2, and I didn't want any of my own). I had been on birth control for 6 years, and hadn't missed a single dose for 2 months, and SURPRISE!!! Preggo. I had just started working for the VA about 6 months prior to findin...
    Posted: September 14, 2009 11:21 AM
  • I am stunned at some of these nasty responses people have. As federal employees we don’t get the same pay and are held to a higher stander then the private sector. Yes, I am blessed to have benefits but a lot of private sector people have better packages. So many are misinformed about how good fe...
    Posted: August 5, 2009 1:05 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.