Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Federal Employees Making More Than Members of Congress? How Can That Be?

By Ralph Smith

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Last week's article on an updated database which provides salary information on individual federal employees (See Highest Human Resources Salary in the Federal Government in 2008: $213,005) generated considerable interest.

Shortly after the daily newsletter was distributed, the database itself became temporarily unavailable--apparently because the server hosting the database was not equipped to handle the level of traffic generated by the article.

By mid-afternoon, the database was back up and, apparently, has been running without incident since that time.

The federal salary structure is confusing, at best. The General Schedule is the best-known salary system but it is hardly the only one. And, as OPM director John Berry said recently, the current federal pay system is "straining and ... balkanized to the point that it risks failure."

There is no doubt that confusion reigns with it comes to information about the federal salary structure--even among federal employees who may be knowledgeable about their own salary structure but not familiar with the system used in different agencies. I do not pretend to be an expert on the various iterations of the federal salary structure.

Readers raised various questions about the salary levels for federal employees. One of the most intriguing were questions that read: "How can a federal employee make over $213,000 a year? That is more than the salary paid to a Congressman and I thought federal employees were 'capped' so that no one made this much money?"

Good point and the question was asked in one form or another by several readers.

Some federal employees are making more money than Congressional representatives. Some federal employees are making more money than some of the leaders of Congress make.

As of 2009, the salary for rank-and-file members of the House and Senate is $174,000 per year. The majority and minority leaders in the House and the Senate each make $193,400. The Speaker of the House makes $223,500.

So what about the pay cap for federal employees? For federal employees under the General Schedule, there is a pay cap. The aggregate limitation on pay for calendar year 2009 is generally $153,200, with exceptions. You can read about some of the various eccentricities of this portion of the "balkanized" federal pay system in this OPM memorandum. You can peruse the GS pay rates for 2009 in this pay calculator.

The number of federal employees making more than those elected Congressional representatives is relatively small. In last week's article, I randomly selected human resources management as a career field to search and found two people in the database making more than $200,000. These jobs are in the Comptroller of the Currency which is within the Department of the Treasury.

The other highest paid federal employees in this field are in agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration. These are agencies with enabling legislation to operate under a pay system that is different than the General Schedule.

These higher salaries are not limited to those in the human resources field. For example, check out the highest salaries in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. There are 22 people making more than $200,000 a year, most of them in the legal profession.

When the director of OPM refers to the "balkanized" pay structure of the federal government, this is probably the type of situation he has in mind. Is a person in the human resources field worth tens of thousands of dollars a year more when working for one agency than in another?

Perhaps they are worth more because of the necessary expertise to recruit employees necessary to accomplish the work of the agency. And, as we pointed out in a recent article involving the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress has passed legislation authorizing higher salaries in some agencies--most often in the financial regulatory arena. (See A Dispute That Could Only Arise Between Public Employees and a Governmental Agency) And, of course, the federal employees making the higher salaries are not answering to the voters and having to defend their salary in the heat of an election campaign as a Congressman might have to do after getting a large pay boost.

So, in answer to the question of how a federal employee can make more salary than Members of Congress, you will have to get a job with an agency that has a special pay system.

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Don't Congressmen and Senators get to draw a large portion of their salary as retirement after on one or terms in office? I don't know of any "federal employee" getting to do that. Don't they have "perks" that the tax payers pay for that no federal employee could ever have? Aren't they elected ...
    Posted: October 22, 2009 5:26 AM
  • My Girlfriend can make $234,000 in her vet practice, and the Feds keep offering her Gs-11 step 1. They don't seem to understand why there is a shortage of them....
    Posted: September 20, 2009 9:43 AM
  • I guess I dont have much grief about a physician making 180-200K a year, based on the number of years to attain that credential but what bugs me are the GED and High School educated GS 14's and 15's. I don't care how good you are, there should be minimum standards for those grade levels and in my op...
    Posted: September 18, 2009 9:46 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.