Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

The Proposed Federal Benefit That Won't Die

By Ralph Smith

Thursday, June 25, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Giving federal employees who are under the FERS retirement system credit for unused sick leave in calculating their retirement annuity is a concept that keeps popping up.

This provision was originally in the tobacco legislation to give the Food and Drug Administration more authority over the regulation of tobacco. The sick leave provision was dropped in the Senate and was not included in the final legislation.  (See TSP Changes Adopted in Tobacco Bill--Sick Leave Provisions for FERS Dropped in Final Legislation)

Another provision that was dropped out of the bill before it became law was the authority to redeposit refunds under the FERS system.

These two items have generated email queries from our readers throughout the legislative process. Those readers with an interest in these topics will be pleased to know that both are now included in a new bill that is now under consideration in the House of Representatives.

HR 2990 is entitled the "Disabled Military Retiree Relief Act of 2009." A portion of this bill would impact federal employee benefits if it becomes law.

In addition to the items above, the new bill would make it easier to rehire federal retirees part time; modify how the Civil Service Retirement System calculates annuity payments for employees who retire as part-time workers; and move federal employees in Alaska, Hawaii and U.S. territories from cost-of-living adjustments into the locality pay system.

There is one item missing from the new bill that has disappointed the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association. The bill does not incorporate language contained in the civil service amendment which Senators Joseph Lieberman, I-CT, and Susan Collins, R-ME, attempted to offer to the recently enacted Tobacco bill. This provision would allow federal agencies to re-employ federal retirees on a limited, part-time basis without offset of annuity from salary.

In a press release, NARFE President Margaret Baptiste said that " "NARFE strongly supports the federal civil service provisions added to H.R. 2990, but we believe that it was not unreasonable to ask that at least one part of the package being considered today would benefit federal retirees; particularly those patriots that want to continue to serve our nation.  Regrettably, this modest proposal has been left out of H.R. 2990, and as a result, we are disappointed."

But, while NARFE may be disappointed along with a number of retired federal employees who may have hoped to increase their income for a time, the omission may not be accidental. Federal employee unions do not like the proposal to allow agencies to rehire retired federal employees without having an impact on their retirement payments. The provision would probably have an impact on encouraging retired federal employees to return to work. The unions would prefer to have the government hire new, permanent, full-time career federal employees. (See The Rehire Geezer Feds Act)

The new bill will undoubedly go through changes as it wends its way through Congress. We will let our readers know about changes that may occur in the process.

 

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • The next time this comes up in Congress, it would be great if the bill were slightly modified so those of us who are already retired could get the benefits. I would not even mind if it just started with the current month - instead of being retroactive. Sign me> It'll probably never happen, so w...
    Posted: July 24, 2009 4:06 PM
  • Sounds like Health Care Provider needs to educate themself on the retirement plans. One of my co-workers took the time to do an in-depth review of both systems. Based on this review they changed to FERS since it would pay them substantially more. Health Care Provider should also be sure to discl...
    Posted: July 20, 2009 10:27 AM
  • Since I am contemplating retirement at the end of this calendar year, what are your thoughts about this bill, HR 2990, being passed through Congress (both the House and the Senate) and signed by the President by the end of Calendar year 2009?...
    Posted: July 16, 2009 10:38 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.