Search:

Custom Search
Photo of John Grobe

What Every Federal Employee's Financial Planner Should Know About Federal Retirement and Benefits

By John Grobe

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

John Grobe is a retired federal employee with over 25 years of experience in federal human resources and President of Federal Career Experts, a training and consulting firm that specializes in federal employee retirement and career transition issues.

 

As federal employees, we have some benefits that most other workers do not. If we are working with a financial planner who is not familiar with our benefits, we risk getting advice that does not fit our situation. 
 
I would hope that most planners within the Washington, DC metropolitan area would have a clear understanding of federal benefits and retirement, but there is no such assurance as you get out of the DC metro area. Indeed, many planners in cities that have large concentrations of federal employees (e.g., New York, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.) may be clueless as to important distinctions between federal and non-federal employees and retirees.
 
Below we will look at several things of which your financial planner should be made aware.
 
Let's start with the basics. Both CSRS and FERS are defined benefit pensions that are significantly different from the defined contribution plans (such as 401(k) plans) that are prevalent in the retirement plans of most private sector companies. All federal employees who have at least five years of civilian service are vested in a "good old-fashioned pension". 
 
Our pension benefits are not dependent on the performance of stocks or bonds
 
Rather, our pension benefit is defined by our length of service and high-three years of salary. Your length of service will give you a percentage factor that is multiplied by your highest three years of salary to give you an annual annuity.
 
Your federal pension must be taken in the form of an annuity
 
There is no lump-sum distribution option available in either CSRS or FERS. Do not confuse the possibility of having your contributions returned to you in a lump sum, should you have nine months or less to live with the common private sector option of taking a large cash payment in lieu of an annuity. (Think of the cash payment value of a Powerball jackpot as an example of a lump-sum distribution). Your CSRS or FERS annuity will last you the rest of your life; no more and no less. You have absolutely no danger of running out of money before you run out of time.
 
Your CSRS or FERS annuity comes with a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)
 
Most of the remaining private sector defined benefit plans do not have COLAs. CSRS retirees begin earning a full COLA (based on the Consumer Price Index for urban wage earners known as CPI-W) when they retire. The FERS COLA is not fully indexed to the CPI-W and may trail it by as much as one percentage point. Most FERS employees must wait until age 62 to begin earning a COLA but there are exceptions for law enforcement officers, firefighters, disability retirees and air traffic controllers.
 
The Federal Employee Health Benefits Program
 
Yet another item of which financial planners need to be made aware is that there is a link between choosing a survivor benefit for your spouse and that spouse's ability to continue enrollment in the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHB)
 
If you do not elect at least some level of survivor benefit and die before your spouse, your spouse will be ineligible to continue enrollment in FEHB. There is a major exception for those of you who are married to another federal employee or retiree; your spouse will be entitled to FEHB in their own right and will not require a survivor benefit to allow them to continue enrollment.
 
This FEHB/survivor benefit link is especially important for your planner to realize, as otherwise he/she may try to sell you life insurance in lieu of your electing a survivor annuity for your spouse. This is called "pension maximization insurance" and may make sense in some situations, but not if it excludes your spouse from FEHB coverage after your death.
 
In an upcoming article, I'll discuss questions you should ask your financial planner.

 

© 2010 John Grobe. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from John Grobe.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Your lament that you should have switched to FERS is based on at least one incorrect factor. If you had switched to FERS in 1987, you would have been covered by at least 21 years of Social Security work (1988-2008) and possibly more if you worked under SS earlier. Therefore you would draw your own...
    Posted: August 21, 2010 12:26 PM
  • With the amount of planners, what company or planner is best for me to chose from. I need your help...
    Posted: August 18, 2010 8:26 AM
  • I retired Jan 2008 under CSRS pension $40,000 yearly and always put max in TSP that has balance of $165,000. Had I switched to FERS when presented the opportunity I would get a pension now approx of $25,000 yearly BUT...I would have put the max into TSP w/5% match by the postal service and now h...
    Posted: August 16, 2010 3:54 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY JOHN GROBE

Contact John Grobe or read more articles on the author's page.