HTML  Text  

Unsubscribe Here

	Close	Change	YTD
G	$13.2114	+0.0012	+0.70%
F	$13.6201	-0.0062	+2.14%
C	$13.8116	-0.0706	+4.49%
S	$17.9282	-0.1903	+8.91%
I	$18.5079	-0.0782	-0.16%

	Close	Change	YTD
L 2040	$16.1968	-0.0789	+3.59%
L 2030	$15.9593	-0.0673	+3.23%
L 2020	$15.7365	-0.0532	+2.72%
L 2010	$15.4595	-0.0197	+1.57%
L Income	$14.0856	-0.0155	+1.48%

• Site Map
• About Us
• Email Us
• Advertise with Us

• RSS
• Print
• Email
• Discuss

• Digg It
• del.icio.us
• Newsvine
• Furl
• Facebook
• Twitter

Susan McGuire Smith spent most of her 26-year federal government career with NASA, first at NASA Headquarters Office of General Counsel and then at Marshall Space Flight Center, serving as Chief Counsel there for more than 14 years. Her expertise is in government contracts, ethics, and personnel law. Ms. Smith has a J.D and a B.A. degree from the George Washington University. Her publications include Practical Ethics for the Federal Employee.

A Physicist/Scientist with the Naval Surface Warfare Center was not able to persuade the appeals court to overturn an indefinite suspension that lasted 370 days after the Navy pulled his security clearance. (Stoyanov v. Department of the Navy, C.A.F.C. No. 2009-3163 (nonprecedential), 9/15/09) The facts reported below are from the court's decision.

 

The Navy followed procedures to suspend Stoyanov's access to classified information based on his falsification of time records, misuse of government computers, and "lack of candor when questioned" about his alleged misconduct. (Opinion pp. 1-2) Meanwhile, the Navy suspended Stoyanov from work and pay indefinitely pending the outcome of the suspension of his security clearance. The court specifically said it had no details as to what happened with the appeal process on the security clearance suspension.

 

In the end, the Navy Central Adjudication Facility reversed the clearance suspension and ordered Stoyanov back to work. This process took a long time and by the time it was over, the work and pay suspension had added up to 370 days. (pp. 2-4)

 

Stoyanov appealed the indefinite disciplinary suspension to the Merit Systems Protection Board. The Administrative Judge ruled that the Board had no jurisdiction to review the merits of a decision suspending a security clearance. All the Board could do was review to determine whether Stoyanov had received due process and the AJ determined that the Navy had followed the proper procedures when it suspended his clearance. (p. 4)

 

When Stoyanov appealed to the full MSPB his case got mired in the fact that the 3-member Board had a vacancy—there were only two Board members and they could not agree on his appeal. Therefore, under Board rules, the AJ's decision automatically became the final decision of the Board. (p. 4)

 

Stoyanov took his case to the appeals court. The court has now affirmed the Board's decision, agreeing with the AJ that the Board has no jurisdiction over the merits of the Navy's security suspension decision: "Although Dr. Stoyanov contends that the suspension of his security clearance and ensuing suspension of his employment…was ‘unlawful in its entirety,' this charge is not within the Board's purview beyond determination of whether he received the minimal due process…." (p. 8)

 

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.

Your Title

Your Agency

Subject of your Comment

Comments

Verification code

Enter above code here

Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

• For the sanctimonious ones who assume that "there must be more to the story," or "they should be fired"; why would you assume that experienced supervisors and HR types aren't willing and able to "get rid of an employee" they don't want without cause? Most personnel rules and procedures are written ...
  Posted: February 26, 2010 11:22 AM
• I know exactly how you feel--they have so call gone after me for the past 10 years..every two years. I don't own anything except my house when I inherited it last december--I have past charge off on my credit that were discharged --they want me to pay the debts that were discharged.I will NOT--now ...
  Posted: December 3, 2009 7:30 AM
• you know sometimes people totally amaze me--if you are any part of the Federal agency you must act like you have a little bit of brains.. wow.....
  Posted: December 1, 2009 3:16 PM

View All Comments »