Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Congressional Movement on Federal Benefits

By Ralph Smith

Thursday, October 8, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

We have received numerous queries from readers recently asking about the status of legislation that would provide new benefits or modify existing benefits for federal employees.

In at least some cases, the person who inquired was apparently delaying a decision on retirement in hopes of obtaining a greater financial benefit by delaying retirement based on potential action by Congress.

In general, predicting what will happen to a particular bill during the legislative process is a fool's game. Too many things can happen that make a prediction on most topics meaningless. We have previously advised readers to make their retirement decisions based on current benefits; delaying your retirement for a year or more waiting or hoping that Congress will change your benefits package may be a good excuse if you really don't want to retire right away but, if you are serious about retirement, you should ask yourself if the potential gain is worth losing a year (or more) out of your retirement years for the possibility of a financial gain in the future.

Having said that, there is legislative action on several human resources topics of interest to readers. Please note that these items have not been finalized. However, a big step has been taken on these issues that could lead to changes in your benefits package.

A press release outlining the results of a conference on the Defense Authorization Bill has been released. Please note also that even if these items do pass in Congress, in at least some cases the actual implementation may be delayed while implementing regulations are written to interpret and apply the benefit changes.

Here is a summary of the changes most likely to be of interest to a wide range of our readers. Most of these are human resources topics that will impact a number of federal employees:

With the conference report containing these provisions, there is a good chance that these provisions will become law. If and when that occurs, we will provide a summary of the changes.

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • With all these possible changes does any one know of any change or the elimination of the offset some of us have to endure because we may have worked and PAID social security taxes for a significant number of years? I worked 24 years in the private sector and 27 years under CSRS. I do get SSI and a ...
    Posted: November 5, 2009 12:11 PM
  • I accepted an appointment thinking my retirement would be CSRS. A couple of months in, I was told I would be FERS. The information about FERS was deliberately hidden from new hires before it came out. So which appointment do I qualify for?...
    Posted: October 9, 2009 5:24 PM
  • really greedy with all the benefits that they expect. Private industry benefits, even for many large Government contractors, don't even come close to the liberal benefits. If they keep going with their greed, I am sure that they will price themselves out of work since, as all of you know, the Gove...
    Posted: October 9, 2009 10:18 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.