Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

The Reality of "Generation U"

By Ralph Smith

Thursday, November 19, 2009

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Many Americans grew up with a rough plan in mind to guide their lives: Go to school, get married, buy a house, get a good job and retire at a pre-determined age. For most Americans, a retirement goal was 65. For many federal employees, a retirement goal was 55.

Most readers have seen comments about the federal "retirement Tsunami." This mass exodus from the federal workforce will supposedly occur because baby boomers will leave the workforce en masse.

Many have retired but there is a large number of baby boomers eligible to retire but are still working for the federal government. And, with the recent passage of additional federal benefits that will make it easier for agencies to rehire some federal employees who have already retired, some people who left their federal office to go to the mountains, the beach or travel around the world may be coming back to work with a federal employee identification card once again dangling around their neck.

Why haven't more baby boomers retired?

From reading comments on this site and elsewhere, an objective observer could easily conclude the workforce has a large number of very unhappy people who feel their lot in life is much worse than it should have been.

In fact, we have published an article on this site about the whining in the federal workforce and how a supervisor has to deal with the problem. (See Effective Whine Management: A Critical Skill for Federal Managers and Supervisors)

From this, one might quickly conclude there will be a stampede for the exit offered by the federal retirement plan as federal employees who are eligible to retire quickly leave for greener pastures. But this has not happened.

Here are the number of employees who have retired in recent years. There is no evidence of a dramatic surge as the baby boomers in the workforce age.

Year No. Of Fed Retirees
2004 55769
2005 61585
2006 60246
2007 62244
2008 58800
2009

34699 (9 months only)

Average (for full year figures) 59728

 

Moreover, it isn't just the federal workforce where the "baby boomers" are staying put.

In fact, a recent article in Psychology Today has a term for this new trend: "generation U" or the unretired generation. Here are some of facts cited underlying "generation U":

Federal employees need less in savings than most Americans because of the retirement system. But, if you are in the FERS retirement system, or even an employee under the CSRS system who put a lot of money into the federal Thrift Savings Plan, your assets have probably diminished during the recession. Anyone planning to retire needs to plan carefully to make sure you can live comfortably and enjoy your retirement. A big drop in your assets may make you think twice before walking out the door. (See, for example, As the Economy Crumbles: One Federal Retiree's Feeble Attempts to Cope)

Baby boomers are also healthier than previous generations. If you recall a relative who was 65 or so when you were a young child, many of these folks seemed really old and frail. People who worked in occupations that led to injuries, or working in a rural area with no health care available, or falling prey to a wide variety of diseases meant people were not as healthy and died at a younger age. In other words, a person who is 65 today may be healthier than a much younger person in an earlier era.

It is also likely that many federal employees who are working despite retirement eligibility are doing so because they like their job. It provides a sense of self-worth and these folks derive satisfaction from going to work and providing a service or contributing to a worthwhile mission or project.

What are your plans for retirement?

Here are the survey results submitted in response to this article. 

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Even though the number uf ferderal workers is going down; the amount they are paid is going up. The people that are going to be "hurt" are the people on CSRS that won't have anyone putting money into the fund. What does everyone else think?...
    Posted: July 21, 2010 2:57 PM
  • It's really pretty simple (from this member of Generation U.) First comes uncertainty (oil spill, Katrina, looming healthcare bill changes, war, terrorism, economic instability.) What I thought 5-10 years ago has been demonstrated to be on shakier ground that expected. Second, there'll surely come...
    Posted: June 18, 2010 4:34 AM
  • I just reread these four pages of comments. Wow! Such anger from younger workers. I am 62, have 41 yrs in CSRS and am still working. I work for an agency that promotes new employees immediately. However these same 20-30 years are the ones sitting at their computers playing games, searching Googl...
    Posted: May 25, 2010 10:43 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.