Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Effective Performance Appraisal: Tips from the MSPB

By Ralph Smith

Friday, February 20, 2004

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Pay-for-performance is getting a lot of attention because many federal employees are going under a performance based system for the first time. To put it mildly, the reaction is one of fear, anger and distrust.

Based on the many comments sent in to FedSmith.com in the past week, the most common reaction is that the supervisor can't be trusted; only the favorite employees will get recognized (which does not include the writers of the comments); and that the whole program is designed solely to cut wages of employees who deserve better.

Thre are a few positive comments but this is the gist of the majority of those taking the time to write in. (You can check out the comments yourself which are at the end of the recent articles linked to the left hand side of this page.)

With that in mind, the Merit Systems Protection Board has advice for supervisors on how to conduct more effective performance appraisals. This is one of several articles from the most recent MSPB newsletter "Issues of Merit." The newsletter is available from the link on the left hand side of the page.

The first piece of advice: understand the work. Many employees think their supervisor doesn't know what they do. Make sure that isn't the case with your employees. It isn't necessary to be completely knowledgeable about the employee's job (that's what the government is paying them for). Buy you should be very familiar with the agency's mission and goals and how each employee fits into this scheme.

Second, communicate. Make sure employees know what is expected of them. What is important to you and what will you be evaluating when you look at an employee's performance? Communicate these requirements clearly and directly.

Third, track goals and performance. To provide credible, constructive feedback, you need to understand and measure organizational and individual performance. Is the organization meeting its goals? Have goals and priorities changed? Are employees meeting, exceeding, or falling short of their objectives? Why or why not?

Finally, communicate again. Feedback should happen on a regular basis. The employee should not be shocked when it's time to issue an annual performance rating.

Pay for performance is coming to many federal employees and no doubt there are going to be more employees covered by the system in the coming months and years. Doing a good job in performance appraisal is an integral part of this system. It isn't as hard as some people make it out to be but it does take time and work.

Take the time to communicate effectively and you may be able to cut short some of the gripes and complaints from your employees.

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • You are certainly correct. I am one of those retirees who got cheated out of a livable retirement. I am, also, one of those people who got overlooked because I did my job well and kept my mouth shut. Maybe I should have made more noise?...
    Posted: October 22, 2004 8:36 AM
  • As a former US Navy veteran, we had a name for these types of people. They were referred to as brown-nosers. I guess the same holds true for the civilian sector of public service. It's not what you know, but who you blow!...
    Posted: February 24, 2004 5:06 PM
  • I have seen during my during my 15 years, a lot of promotions due to who the person knew and not necessarily what they knew. And now you are asking these individuals to make the decisions regarding this process. No wonder the Federal Government has a poor public image with the people of this count...
    Posted: February 23, 2004 5:41 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.