Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Pay, Politics, and Practical Prognostication

By Ralph Smith

Monday, November 8, 2004

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

There are still several races to be determined in the election for the House of Representatives, but the Republicans now have a margin of more than 30 seats. The Republicans now have 55 seats in the Senate.

What impact will this have on the 2005 pay raise?

The president has proposed 1.5 percent for civilians and 3.5 percent for the military. But "par parity" is not universally accepted. The most likely outcome is a 3.5 percent for civilians in 2005 although many employees won't see the extra money until later in the year.

Ernest J. Istook Jr., (R-OK) chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that handles the federal pay raise, still backs the President's proposal for a 1.5 percent increase for federal civilians in 2005. According to a recent report in Government Executive, Congressman Istook isn't giving up his fight to limit the increase. Reducing the size of the pay raise to 1.5% would save about two billion dollars a year.

The Congressman has noted previously that federal employees have routinely been given a pay raise in excess of the inflation rate and at a higher rate than given to those receiving Social Security-- a 30 percent pay raise over the past eight years.

And how about raises in the private sector? According to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal, white collar workers in the private sector will be getting about 3.4 percent in raises this year and about 3.6% next year. According to Hewitt Associates, a human resources consulting firm, white collar raises in the private sector were about 3.6% in 2002 and 3.4% in 2003. From this perspective, the 4.1% raise for federal employees in 2004 isn't too bad.

But some agency heads who think they are seriously underpaid compared with their private sector counterparts may have a good point. According to the same report, compensation for chief executive officers went up about 7.2% in 2003 to a median of about $2,118,000. Other pay perks such as stock options are not included in this figure.

If you would like to see your approximate salary for 2005, check out the FedSmith.com pay tables. When you enter your grade, step and location, the program will give you your approximate pay for 2005 taking into account a 1.5% increase and a 3.5% increase. These are not official figures. The final figures will vary according to the amount of the final increase given for each pay locality. There may also be changes in pay localities.

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Government employment makes most of us unemployable in the private sector. Many employers simply avoid hiring ex-government employees. Therefore, we have to accept whatever comes, or leave and start elsewhere from sractch. This may be particularly hard after many years of service....
    Posted: December 17, 2004 12:42 PM
  • Try to find the job yourself outside government. Maybe you could, with some defense contractor to help in bidding for big money, if you can prove there is no conflict of interest. Other than defense contractor sectors may not want to talk to you despite your "management" experience. Unfortunately f...
    Posted: December 17, 2004 11:29 AM
  • I would like to know how much my salary wil be in 2005....
    Posted: December 9, 2004 5:22 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.