Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

2006 Pay: How Will Federal Increase Compare With Private Sector?

By Ralph Smith

Friday, August 5, 2005

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

The annual pay raise for federal employees is always a touchy subject for many readers. From the e-mail and comments posted on the FedSmith.com site, many (probably most) readers think federal employees don't get paid enough. Others (perhaps readers who are not federal employees) say federal employees already make more than most people in the private sector so they should get a minimal pay raise, if any.

As the chart in one of our previous articles shows, federal employees have done very well compared to workers in the private sector over the past five years.

What about 2006? We know that the president has proposed a pay raises of 2.3% but, at the same time, proposed a pay raise for the military of 3.1%. Most federal employees are undoubtedly hoping they will get the same 3.1% as proposed for the military when January rolls around. And, based on experience in recent years and under different presidents, it is likely that the 3.1% raise will be what employees actually receive by the time the political dust has settled as pay parity has often become a rallying cry for those who support larger pay increases for federal employees.

If employees do get the 3.1% pay raise, how does this compare to what those in the private sector are getting? While federal employees have fared very well compared to those working for private companies, that may not be the case this year.

A recent report from Mercer Human Resource Consulting says that the average pay increases for 2006 are going to be about 3.6%. In part, this is because the number of companies imposing pay freezes (i.e. no pay increase at all) have decreased. Only 2% of employers report salary freezes now compared with 16% back in 2002. In industries such as auto manufacturing or airlines where the competition, changes in the marketplace, or financial obligations have exceeded revenue, most employees won't be getting a wage increase and may be losing their jobs and at least some of their expected retirement benefits..

Companies are also using other ways to increase salaries. These can include using bonuses for a particular project. This is often cheaper for the company because it does not impact future financial obligations and, from a positive standpoint, most people like getting a check for a job well done--especially when it was not expected.

And, like the federal government which is moving toward a pay for performance system, a number of companies determine salary increases based on job performance and not just on seniority or length of time a person has held a job.

This may not make you feel any better if you are of the view that federal salaries are lagging behind those in the private sector. On the other hand, the pay increase you are likely to get as a federal employee is likely to be in the same ballpark as the typical raise for private sector workers and has exceeded that of most private sector workers in recent years.




© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Where will we inject all this anger and inquiry, who is listening, what can we do? Who can help us, I say OBABA!...
    Posted: November 17, 2008 6:50 AM
  • Employee DOT I don't understand how you could be so negative to an entire agency based off something you think you know. I am well educated and at age 24 I have 5 years of upper level management under my belt and the main reason I came to TSA was because I felt it was something I needed to do. We do...
    Posted: October 18, 2006 11:17 AM
  • To the Resource Conservationist of the NRCS, this is an informal posting. I don't think proofreading is in order. If you have comments against what I have said, then please explain why I am wrong....
    Posted: November 21, 2005 2:55 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.