Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

John Kerry's "Spendometer" and Those Treasury Department Tax Analysts

By Ralph Smith

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Politics can be a brutish sport. And, at the national level, it usually is.

Federal employees are affected by politics. And, while some may look at the Hatch Act as making them "second class citizens" because it restricts some political activity on their part (See Trick or Treat as a recent example), it also protects them from some of the direct effects of politics that employees on a local level know all too well. Federal employees can't be forced to campaign for a candidate to keep their jobs, for example, or can't be forced to contribute to a political campaign in order to keep their jobs.

But politics is still omnipresent. Here is an unusual example of how some employees were impacted by the 2004 presidential election but ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing.

Back in 2004, as the presidential election campaign was heating up, Democrats criticized Republicans for using career federal employees working in the Treasury Department to critique tax policies proposed by Senator John Kerry. The critique was subsequently used to attack the policies of Senator Kerry who became the Democrats' nominee for president.

Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, went in front of news reporters and TV cameras and demanded that the White House stop the "inappropriate use of taxpayer funds to research a Democratic tax plan." A Treasury Department representative said at the time that the report was prudent and appropriate and that "It's our obligation to do it."

The study was subsequently used by the Republican National Committee as the premise behind a web site entitled the "John Kerry Spendometer." The analysis concluded that "hardworking individuals and married couples could have their taxes raised" in amounts ranging from $201 billion to $477 billion.

At the time, Republicans defended the analysis by the Treasury Department and said that similar analyses were conducted during the Clinton administration and used to attack tax plans proposed by Republicans.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) investigated the critique. OSC is responsible for investigating possible violations of political activity by federal employees under the Hatch Act. In this case, the issue was whether federal employees violated the Hatch Act when they did the analysis of the Kerry tax proposals.

The Office of Special Counsel concluded that there was no violation of law in this case and concluded that the General Counsel's office within the Treasury Department has given "problematic" guidance to employees for a number of years by essentially asking Treasury tax analysts to ignore potential violations of the Hatch Act.

The results of the investigation were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and reported in the Wall Street Journal which first reported the analysis of Kerry's tax plan had been done by the Treasury Department.

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • It's the same old thing - politics is politics no matter who is in the White House and that always comes before any consideration of what is best for the country....
    Posted: September 15, 2005 10:52 AM
  • I agree. And I'm sure the employees have enough real work to do, rather than analyze tax plans proposed by candidates who aren't even in the right office to affect them. The political parties should be able to fund independent analyses....
    Posted: September 15, 2005 6:50 AM
  • This activity doesn't pass the smell test, regardless of which administration may have engaged in it or whose political appointee is currently over OSC. The spirit of the law matters as well as the letter, and the spirit of the Hatch Act is violated with this type of activity....
    Posted: September 14, 2005 6:14 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.