Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

2006 Pay Raise Moves Forward in Congress

By Ralph Smith

Monday, November 21, 2005

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

A couple of events in Congress late Friday afternoon will interest our readers.

Congress has approved a pay raise giving members a raise of $3100 or so. With no discussion or argument, the pay for most rank-and file Congressmen went up to $165,200 a year. Based on a recent survey, most readers won't necessarily think that is a good idea. (See "Congressional Pay and Your 2006 Raise.")

On the other hand though, Congress continued its generosity with the public purse by raising the salaries of federal employees by 3.1%. The new pay rate would become effective in January.

The raise is in the appropriations bill covering the Transportation, Treasury and Housing and Urban Development departments, Judiciary, District of Columbia and independent agencies. It was approved in the House by a vote of 392-31. It passed in the Senate by voice vote.

The administration has proposed a raise of 2.3% and there was also an attempt by some Senators to eliminate the 2006 raise altogether. There is no indication that the President will veto this bill over the issue of the pay raise so the amount is creeping closer to reality.

The 3.1% average raise would match the raise to be given to military personnel but would fall short of the 4.1% cost of living increase many federal retirees will see next year.

One thing all readers will agree on is that the process for setting federal pay rates is tortuous and time-consuming. Because of the locality pay provision, the actual raise will vary by region. The 3.1% is an average raise. Some current federal employees will actually get more than 5% and some will get less than the 3.1%.

You can see the current and historical pay rates for federal employees going back to 1997 using the FedSmith.com federal pay calculator.

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • As a WG employee at Hill AF Base, without the wg's the GS worker's would not have any thing to work on ( just DoD ). WG worker's should recieve at lest the same if not more pay....
    Posted: January 26, 2009 9:26 AM
  • This pay raise is still NOT enough for Californians!! The cost of living, housing, etc. is astronomical!!!! It doesn't matter how much we earn, it won't be enough to live as comfortably as we need. Don't get me wrong, I'm not fussing, but it would be nice if Congress could, for once, give us a li...
    Posted: December 20, 2005 5:18 PM
  • Yes it does, "capped" at the GS rate, also, the active employee pay raise is NOT a Cola! COLA's are for retirees only. ...
    Posted: December 12, 2005 8:32 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.