Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Political Activity Trips Up Federal Attorney

By Ralph Smith

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

One way a federal employee can get in trouble is with the Hatch Act. The rules are sometimes vague and political passions may be intense.

Periodically, a new case pops up about a federal employee who has been on the receiving end of an adverse or disciplinary action for engaging in improper political activity.

Here is the latest case. A lawyer for the Small Business Administration was an elected official for the California Green Party. Perhaps that would have been okay but he took his political passion straight to Uncle Sam's computer keyboard and internet access portal while he was on duty.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) investigated and found widespread use of his government e-mail program to further his position within the party. OSC asked the Merit Systems Protection Board to enforce the prohibitions of the Hatch Act. The initial decision of the administrative judge has been issued and upholds the removal of Jeffrey Eisinger for having engaged in partisan political activity while working for the federal government.

In his 22-page initial decision, the administrative judge found that over a three-year period, the federal employee had received, read, drafted or sent more than 100 emails through his government computer that were directed toward the success of the Green Party.

The emails concerned topics such as party fundraising opportunities, outreach and recruitment plans, internal drafts of various party platforms, and the planning of a state-wide Green Party political convention. The conclusion: “Eisinger’s political activities at work and in his government office were continual and significant.”

The AJ concluded that Eisinger knew the Hatch Act prohibited federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity while at work. He also concluded that Eisinger had assured his supervisor he would not entangle the agency in any ethical or Hatch Act issues.

Eisinger had earlier been suspended by SBA for misuse of the government email system.

Eisinger can still appeal his removal to the full Board if he chooses to do so.

In a press release, Special Counsel Scott Bloch was quoted: “Technology has wrought many changes in recent years, from horse-drawn carriages to whistle-stop campaigning to email to internet fundraising. However, it remains the law that government resources must not be used for political activities. Whether it’s old-school low-tech or new-school hi-tech, the Hatch Act remains an important principle our office is dedicated to enforcing.”

© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • I don't see this as frivolous at all. He's an agency attn'y who is supposed to uphold the law! What kind of message does this send to the workforce if management does not take this seriously? He has to be held to a higher standard because of his position. ...
    Posted: December 30, 2005 11:57 AM
  • He should have known not to use a government computer for anything political and even personal too. Work is work, personal life is personal life, and politics is politics. He deserved to be fired for acting stupid....
    Posted: November 30, 2005 12:28 PM
  • 100 e-mails over 3 years (156 weeks), so about 2 e-mails every 3 weeks? That's considered abusing e-mail? Please. Someone just must not have liked the guy. What about political comments on this site? Can everyone who sends in a comment be sited for misuse of government property?...
    Posted: November 30, 2005 11:06 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.