Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

President Proposes 2.2% Pay Raise for Feds in 2007

By Ralph Smith

Monday, February 6, 2006

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

For those readers who like to follow such things as their amount of annual pay, the annual dance to determine the annual pay raise dance for federal employees is now underway.

President Bush has sent his proposed budget to Congress. As usual, it is a monster document and you can probably count on one hand the number of people who will actually read the entire document.

Computers can make searching through a document like this interesting. It makes is possible to find a small piece of information buried deep within the document.

For example, the proposed federal pay raise for federal employees for 2007. How much is being proposed? It isn't a major heading in the budget. It isn't a separate paragraph either. But there is one line in a table on page 169 of the budget that provides the information.

And the answer is...2.2%.

That is the amount of money being proposed for the federal employee pay raise in 2007. The annual pay raise that federal employees actually received in 2004 was 4.15%. In 2005, it was 3.5%. And in 2006, the average salary increase for 2006 for federal employees was 3.1%. Some people got more, some got less depending on geographic location because of locality pay.

But the 2006 pay raise did not start off at 3.1%. The President had originally proposed 2.3%. After the usual Congressional maneuvering, the military and civilian workforce both ended up with parity.

Something similar may happen again for 2007. The amount proposed for the military is also 2.2%. Inflation is up so a raise of 2.2% is unlikely to equal the rate of inflation for the year. If so, it is possible that federal retirees will again get a greater raise than current federal employees because they get a cost-of-living increase and the amount of their increase is based on a formula that is computed automatically. (See COLA's, Pay Raises and the Federal Community) That happened in 2006 and many retirees got a 4.1% increase; that disparity could certainly happen again in 2007.

What will the final pay raise be for federal employees in 2007? We will let you know when the figure is final, probably in December 2006.


© 2009 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Locality pay has to do with local wages and salaries, not cost of living. The highest locality pay is in Huston, because of the high salaries for the oil industry, but the cost of living is less than either Philadelphia or Washington, or a lot of places in the US....
    Posted: September 27, 2006 9:24 AM
  • If I remeber correctly, the legislation required that the first year, people in the NPS would get the same annual raise (or at least that much) as the rest of the gov't. After that who knows, although *IF* you believe what the powers said, it should be at least close, and more attuned to local wage...
    Posted: September 27, 2006 9:21 AM
  • Yes, I guess that is what I'm saying. Cut corners where you can, or supplement your income with a second job. I did it out of necessity just so I could feed my children. You do what it takes. But to just sit back and say, "Govt, feed me!" I just don't want any part of that. If you think that so...
    Posted: September 27, 2006 8:36 AM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.