Search:

Custom Search

Courtesy and Demeanor Memo

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

General advice on handling personnel problems may not be applicable to specific situations. Be sure to check with your human resources advisors for guidance in your particular personnel situation.

MEMORANDUM

DATE:

TO: Employee

FROM: Supervisor

SUBJECT: Courtesy and Demeanor

I have received feedback from a number of people both within and outside the NAME OF AGENCY/OFFICE expressing concern with the way you handle interactions with people with whom you come into contact in your official duties. This memorandum is intended to make clear to you my expectations of you regarding these interactions. Because your working relationships are crucial to the successful accomplishment of your job, the following are work assignments not suggestions.

1. Requirements Applicable to All Official Dealings.

A. You should always deal with people with whom you come into contact as a result of your official duties with courtesy and civility.
B. You should always avoid undignified or discourteous conduct which could negatively impact on the ability of the NAME OF AGENCY/OFFICE to successfully complete a work project.
C. You should never make disparaging or demeaning personal remarks.
D. You should always avoid acrimony in your dealings.
E. You should refer to all adult persons by their surnames (of course adding Mr., Ms. or an appropriate title, e.g., Dr., Captain, etc.) and not by their first or given names unless the person advises you that such use is acceptable to them.
F. You should not get involved in an argument. If you disagree with someone on a matter, you may make your opinion known, if appropriate to the circumstances and then advise me.

2. Dealings with Individuals Inside the NAME OF AGENCY/OFFICE. The success of OFFICE NAME depends on our ability to make and maintain cooperative and productive relationships with other offices particularly other units within the AGENCY/OFFICE NAME. To this end, you are to make an affirmative effort to build good working relationships with staff members of these offices. Within OFFICE NAME, I expect you to develop working relationships that improve the overall effectiveness of the Division.

3. Dealings with Individuals Outside the NAME OF AGENCY/OFFICE. The requirements specified in No. 1. above are particularly important with regard to representatives and employees of NAME CONTACTS.

You should consider this memorandum as a work assignment. If you don’t understand what is expected from you in any of the above, you should let me know immediately so I might clarify the memorandum for you. Otherwise, you are to consider this memorandum effective upon your receipt of it. I expect you to bring to my immediate attention or in my absence, NAME’s attention, any incident in which you are involved that may impact adversely on the goals and requirements stated in this memorandum



© 2008 Robert J. Gilson. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent from Robert J. Gilson.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • The problem we have where I work is that the supervisor is viewed so poorly by outside agencies that the workforce is being compromised. With a little modification, I could use this letter to let our supervisor know what we, as a workforce, expect of him, also. Good letter, and thank you....
    Posted: March 30, 2006 9:00 AM
  • This type of memo will be helpful. I've encountered employees (my own and co-workers) whose communication styles lacked professionalism. During one performance evaluation I noted I received several comments concerning this employee's communications, from people at various levels in the organization...
    Posted: March 29, 2006 10:37 AM

View All Comments »

 HTML  Text