Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Susan Smith

Whoops! Wrong Brief Submitted

By Susan Smith

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

Susan McGuire Smith spent most of her 26-year federal government career with NASA, first at NASA Headquarters Office of General Counsel and then at Marshall Space Flight Center, serving as Chief Counsel there for more than 14 years. Her expertise is in government contracts, ethics, and personnel law. Ms. Smith has a J.D and a B.A. degree from the George Washington University. Her publications include Practical Ethics for the Federal Employee.
A recent case decided by the Federal Circuit falls into the “now we’ve seen it all department.” (Vaughns v. Office of Personnel Management, U.S.C.A.F.C. No. 05-3253 (non-precedent), 5/4/06)

Mr. Vaughns was fired by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). He represented himself in two appeals before the Merit Systems Protection Board. In one, he challenged the removal. In another he sought reconsideration of the decision by the Office of Personnel Management denying him disability retirement because his application was untimely.

The Administrative Judge issued two decisions. In Docket No. DA-831E-04-0262-I-1, the AJ affirmed the OPM disallowance of Vaughns’ disability retirement. In Docket No. DA-0432-04-0261-I-1, the AJ dismissed Vaughns’ adverse action appeal as untimely filed. (Opinion, pp. 1-2).

At this juncture, Mr. Vaughns hired an attorney who filed petitions for review with the full Board. The attorney fared no better than Mr. Vaughns had. The Board denied the petitions and the AJ’s decisions thus became final MSPB decisions. (p. 2).

Vaughns’ attorney took the case to the appeals court. However, he filed a single petition and attached only the MSPB decision on Vaughns’ disability retirement application. Inexplicably, he submitted a brief addressing the other MSPB decision on Vaughns’ removal appeal.

Unfortunately for Mr. Vaughns, the court could not entertain his removal appeal: “Because Mr. Vaughns did not petition this court for review of the MSPB decision relating to his removal, and because the 60-day filing deadline has passed, it would be outside the bounds of our statutory authority to review the removal decision.” (pp. 2-3)

The court did consider the petition for review of the MSPB decision on his disability retirement, but, “[i]n the absence of briefing on the …claim, we can review at most for plain error on the record. We see none.” In short, Mr. Vaughns is out of court.

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • Just goes to prove that you should never give a person more than one thing to do at one time...They will screw up both of them in the worst possible way....
    Posted: May 30, 2006 12:19 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY SUSAN SMITH

Contact Susan Smith or read more articles on the author's page.