Search:

Custom Search
Photo of Ralph Smith

Your 2007 Pay Increase: Plenty to Make Some Happy and Some Angry

By Ralph Smith

Friday, June 9, 2006

You can have daily headlines from FedSmith.com delivered right to your desktop each business morning. The service is free and you don't get junk e-mail as the price of your subscription. Just visit our newsletter page to sign up!

The 2007 pay raise for federal employees is rolling along the same path it has followed in recent years.

Pay parity has become a successful rallying cry for politicians in Congress who support higher pay raises for large numbers of federal employees in their districts. It has enabled federal civilian employees to ride on the coattails of support for higher pay for military personnel. The same tactic is working again this year. (See Dancing and Playing to the Crowd: Predictions for Your 2007 Pay Raise)

The House Appropriations Committee voted this week to give federal civilians the same 2.7 percent average pay increase the House has already approved for military personnel in the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act. (See 2.7% Increase for 2007 Gets Congressional Boost)

In short, the likelihood is increasing that the average pay increase for federal civilian employees in 2007 will also be 2.7 percent.

Another possibility that is looking more likely this year: Federal retirees may get a higher "pay raise" than those that are still working. Last year, federal employees got an average pay increase of 3.1%. But many former feds who are now on the retirement rolls did even better: They received an increase of 4.1%! (See Fed Retirees Can Look Forward to Bigger Than Expected Increase!)

A similar situation is likely to play out again this year. Here's why.

Federal employees get a pay raise. Federal retirees get a cost of living allowance (COLA) increase.

From looking at comments on various articles, a casual reader would think that both groups are getting a bump in their COLA. It may be a technical difference but it is different. There is no preset formula for giving federal employees a pay raise each year. The process for approving the pay raise for federal employees has played out the about the same in recent years. The reality is that how much of an increase you will get next year as an active duty federal civilian employee is a political decision and will be determined by Congress and the President.

But, for the COLA increase, a formula is in place. The amount that many federal retirees will get next year depends on the rate of inflation. Currently, according to our friends at the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE), the cost of living allowance index would give retirees an increase of 2.3%.

But the 2.3% will not be the final figure. It changes each month and the 2007 pay raise will not be determined until the end of third quarter. (For those who absolutely must know more about how the figures are determined, check out this OPM page on COLA's.)

A likely scenario is that federal employees will get an average increase of 2.7%. Federal retirees may get--in fact are likely to get--3% or more. How much more depends on the rate of inflation between now and the end of September.

No doubt, this turn of events will elicit an angry outcry from some readers who will contend they are overworked and underpaid and retirees are getting a better deal than active federal employees. They may be right; no doubt it depends on your geographic location and the specific occupation.

But, if it makes these readers feel any better, from reading editorials in newspapers around the country, some Americans think they are getting a raw deal compared to federal employees. As a recent report noted: "Since 1990, average compensation has increased 115 percent in the government and 69 percent in the private sector, while average wages have increased 104 percent the government and 65 percent in the private sector."

So, regardless of your point of view, there is plenty for people who are so inclined to look at the pay scenario and conclude they should be happy because they are getting a good deal; there is also plenty for those so inclined to conclude they should be mad because they are getting cheated out of what they believe is their entitlement to a bigger piece of the economic pie.

But, for now, it looks like many federal employees will wind up with an average of 2.7% in 2007. Except, of course, those large numbers of people who will get more or less depending on their geographic location. To see how your current pay compares with your colleagues around the country, check out these pay calculators.

© 2010 FedSmith Inc. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express written consent of FedSmith Inc.

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.

Readers' Comments

  • I just retired last month from Vandenberg AFB, CA Fire Dept., I don't know where you work but I believe it is not the usual situation, i.e., sitting around all day telling sea stories. We worked our butts off when not fighting fires or responding to medical emergencies we were training for that eve...
    Posted: July 18, 2007 4:15 PM
  • As a retired serviceman and now a Federal Fireman, the Federal Service pay is just great. How about sitting around all day telling sea stories and get excellent pay, benefits, and working hours. Those guys spending 20 or more years in active duty and retired in as E-7 or below is just getting screwe...
    Posted: February 16, 2007 4:20 PM
  • STOP spouting out the company line. You are either part of the problem or part of the solution. We are the backbone of greatest country on earth. We should be treated appropriately. Congress never balks at giving themself a pay raise....
    Posted: December 7, 2006 3:30 PM

View All Comments »

MORE BY RALPH SMITH

Contact Ralph Smith or read more articles on the author's page.