Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 29
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Readers Say Change in Leadership in Congress is Positive
Total Comments: 29
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2068 | +0.0035 | +0.67% |
| F | $13.6034 | +0.0087 | +2.02% |
| C | $13.6990 | +0.0063 | +3.64% |
| S | $17.9053 | -0.0670 | +8.77% |
| I | $18.3571 | -0.1731 | -0.97% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1066 | -0.0408 | +3.02% |
| L 2030 | $15.8797 | -0.0339 | +2.71% |
| L 2020 | $15.6688 | -0.0268 | +2.28% |
| L 2010 | $15.4289 | -0.0062 | +1.37% |
| L Income | $14.0606 | -0.0041 | +1.30% |
Leadership Poll
VA
Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:00 AM
Post Reply
I'm curious when the question was posed, "In your view, what is the most significant current issue for the federal workforce?", why federal workers aren't asked how they feel about the Windfall Elimination Act? This issue always takes a back burner and as far as I'm concerned, CSRS employees should be concerned. We're being penalized working for Uncle Sam while employees in the private sector can collect their retirement annuities and social security. I've put in the SS system and earned all my SS credits working with the outside world let alone the government. How about any of you out there? Let's discuss that for once.
Re: Leadership Poll
vha
Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:22 PM
Influence on TSP
ssa
Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:06 AM
Post Reply
Many Feds may think the change in Congress/Senate is positive, but I fear it is definitely not good for the TSP!
Re: Influence on TSP
DoD
Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:44 PM
Windfall Elimination Issue
VHA
Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:17 AM
Post Reply
I agree that the Windfall Elimination issue is a very important issue for CSRS employees. I, too, have experience with SS prior to joining the VA. I also plan to work in the private sector post-VA retirement. It would be nice to someday get a bit more money for all my work time outside federal employment.
Selfish responses to survey?
US Forest Service
Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:54 PM
Post Reply
It appears that most of the survey respondents were more concerned with how the change in congress will affect their financial well being rather than their respective agencies' ability to accomplish their assigned missions.
As a federal land manager, I am anxious to see how the new congressional leadership will make it easier for the land management agencies to implement forest health and fire reduction treatments on the millions of acres of overstocked timber stands. The problem of appeals and litigation still needs to be addressed or this country will continue to see catastrophic wildfires and billions of taxpayer dollars thrown at fire suppression costs.
Purge
DOD/USAF
Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:45 PM
Post Reply
There are neo-cons, & Rummy mongers, still in DOD & the Pentagon. They should be driven out & burned at the stake!! (Just kidding!!)
Accountability
DOI
Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:26 AM
Post Reply
Maybe now we'll get some accountability in government. It's ironic that the party who so fervently courted the Religious Right (you'd think GOP stood for "God's Own Party") was so scandal-ridden and ethically challenged. But then I never believed there was much of a connection between religion and morality anyway.
Re: Accountability
DOD
Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:14 AM
Re: Accountability
DoD
Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:52 AM
Re: Accountability
DOD
Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:13 AM
In pointing fingers at one party for campaign rhetoric you're forgetting that the other party also guilty of the same kind of rhetoric regarding ethics.
Re: Accountability
DOI
Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:05 PM
Re: Accountability
DOD
Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:12 PM
Re: Accountability
DOI
Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:49 AM
Re: Accountability
DOD
Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:09 AM
If you want to bring up the Foley incident (yes he was a sleazeball and allegations continue about coverups), perhaps you should bring up Congressman Studds too. Unlike Foley, who was run out of office when his actions became public, Studds was lauded by his colleagues and continued in office after his sexual relationship with a 17 year old page was brought to life.
That being said, it won’t do anybody any good to lapse into a contest of who can dig up the most dirt so let’s not go down that road. If you truly believe that one party is so much more corrupt than the other then you need way more help than anybody here can give you. Good luck.
Re: Accountability
DOI
Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:34 PM
Interesting that you had to go back over three decades (1973) to find a Democratic scandal on par with the Mark Foley case, except Gerry Studds relationship was with a consenting page who was of legal age. BTW, Studds was not lauded for his actions as you say. He was censured by the House of Representatives.
Re: Accountability
DOD
Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:31 PM
I referenced 1973. So what? It's what occurred to me off the top of my head. What's the point of dragging this down to a contest of who can dig up the most dirt as you're attempting to? The ONLY thing that proves is which one of us can dig up the most dirt which serves no useful purpose in this discussion. There's plenty to cover both major parties despite your continued insistence that one party is so much worse than the other.
Neither party is blameless... both parties have serious ethics problems. It can't be stated much simpler than that and it's unfortunate that you're having so much trouble understanding it.
Re: Accountability
DOE
Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:34 PM
Re: Accountability
DOI
Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:58 AM
The Change In Congress
DHS
Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:03 AM
Post Reply
If some of the readers think the election results are a good thing and that we will have better leadership and a better Congress had better think again. Apparently there are some who believe that the winning political party is incapable of corruption, mis-management, lack of concern, etc. Fact: Democrats do not walk on water. Another fact: Republicans do not walk on water. And still, another fact: Both parties have their share of misdeeds. I have heard it said that Congress is a reflection of the American Electorate. If that is the case, well, I am afraid the new Congress reflects a very ignorant and uninformed electorate.