Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 69
Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of 5
« Previous | Next »
Federal Employees Unleashed! Readers Speak Out on Presidential Candidates
Total Comments: 69
Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of 5
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $12.5762 | +0.0013 | +2.41% |
| F | $12.1248 | -0.0104 | +1.63% |
| C | $14.4899 | -0.1349 | -12.50% |
| S | $18.2226 | -0.2020 | -7.92% |
| I | $19.8863 | -0.3240 | -19.68% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.2656 | -0.1570 | -10.82% |
| L 2030 | $15.8058 | -0.1329 | -9.21% |
| L 2020 | $15.4005 | -0.1088 | -7.50% |
| L 2010 | $14.9685 | -0.0547 | -3.18% |
| L Income | $13.3648 | -0.0296 | -0.78% |
Potential Presidential Candidates
SSA
Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:47 AM
Post Reply
If your sampling of quotes is truly representative, I am ashamed to be a Federal employee today.
It is frightening to see Feds who missed the fact that the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and the Cold War is over. Socialists? Communists? Get over it. Is this what passes for "thinking" among Feds today?
Remember the OKC Federal Building bombing? It was carried out by former military types with the same mentaility as expressed in several of the comments. Frightening to think these people have taken an oath to defend the Constitution and yet have these extremist positions.
The Obama Muslim lie was a fiction created by Fox News and exposed in less than 24 hours by respectable news media as a complete lie, yet apparently some Feds get all their news from propaganda central without further thought.
I don't know that I support any of the top choices in your poll but I do know the reader responses are a shcoking commentary on how far from the mainstream many Feds seem to be.
Re: Potential Presidential Candidates
DFAS
Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:35 AM
Re: Potential Presidential Candidates
USAG
Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:29 AM
And, if fox news is so disreputable, why do they have so many viewers and why are other main stream media programs trying to mimic them?
My father had always been a die hard democrate. He was always saying that Democrates help the working class. In his sixties he started watching Fox News. And, little by little he began to say "well you know that makes sense" or I didn't know about that. People should be given all the news/information and let them form their own opinion. That's the part liberals don't like - people thinking for themselves.
Re: Potential Presidential Candidates
US Coast Guard
Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:03 PM
Re: Potential Presidential Candidates
usaf
Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:52 PM
The greatest irony is in people voting against their own self-interests & against the tenets of the US Constitution. Where's a good Libertarian when you need one? Unfortunately, Ron Paul doesn't stand a chance.
Re: Potential Presidential Candidates
DFAS
Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:40 PM
I watch FOX, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, ABC and CBS. If you would watch more than 1 channel, then you would see more views to make a opinion on this subject. As bad as Bush has made it in Iraq and the rest of the world, we need the best American who can solve that problem. I don't care if it a Democratic or a Republican or a Libertarian or a woman or a minority. I feel sorry for our country.
It's still a long time from the 2008 election
VA
Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:20 AM
Post Reply
It's silly to get too passionate about the Presidential field this early in the election cycle. Think back to March, 1967, if you're old enough: would anyone have foreseen the candidacy of Eugene McCarthy; the assasination of Robert Kennedy; and the decision by LBJ not to run for reelection? In March, 1971, Edmund Muskie was the clear front-runner for the '72 Democrat nomination; later, George McGovern was the hottest thing going until he lost to Richard Nixon in a landslide (perhaps McGovern was the Barack Obama of his day?) No matter the election year, there's too much that can happen between "now and then" to get concerned one way or the other.
election choices
US Courts, Atlanta, GA
Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:49 AM
Post Reply
I certainly would not vote for Hillary or Obama. Hillary is worst than her husband which was caused the lack of respect in this country. Obama was raised as Islamic and would be selling out our country! I don't think I'd ever vote for any woman, especially Hillary! Probably McCain is the closest to my beliefs and would have my vote.
Re: election choices
HUD
Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:36 PM
What evidence do you have that Obama was raised a Muslim and would sell out the country? The man lived in Indonesia, a Muslim country, for 4 years as a child below 10 years of age. He attended for 7 years a school that was founded by Congregational missionaries and now attends a United Church of Christ church....
2008 election
Dept of Defense
Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:57 AM
Post Reply
Its to early to form an opion one way or the other. I just know for the first time since I have been old enough to vote I don't like any republican in the lineup. Depending on who gets the Democratic nomanation will depend on if I even vote but I neither Clinton or Obama impress me. I have to agree that it is to early to know whats going to happen, I would like to here about the other democratics tho. I am getting bored with Clinton and Obama. I do feel all of these people will tell us anything they think we want to hear to get elected. Has any past president lived up to his promises made durin a campagin?
Appalling Commentary on Presidential Candidates
IRS
Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:12 AM
Post Reply
I was appalled and depressed to read the comments submitted by readers on the Presidential candidates. I too am not thrilled by the front-runners at this point, but the vitriolic and often ignorant comments by current and former feds indicates that they are just as uninformed and zealous as the general public. Just as an example, one reader asserted that Senator Obama is an "undercover radical islamic fascist and will invoke sharil law." Senator Obama belongs to a United Church of Christ congregation. This kind of ignorance leads me to hope that such people simply don't vote at all. So many comments criticized candidates for being too liberal or too conservative, and very few asked for candidates with constitutional knowledge. Our country is in big trouble right now and not because of individual issues like immigration and health care. Rather, the problems are the lack of open debate, commitment to democratic principles, and intelligent problem solving. None of the major candidates appear to be the answer, in my opinion.
Re: Appalling Commentary on Presidential Candidates
DoD
Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:57 AM
Bless your heart and your fully functioning intelligence. There seems to be a lot of that missing in the federal workplace these days. Whatever happened to the natural curiosity that propells individuals to get their information from several sources, not just one before they form opinions? We've known for many years that news agencies have "slants" when they report. Why would anyone want to go to just one source...unless they enjoy holding the village idiot title?
Comments on Presidential Candidates
USDA
Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:17 AM
Post Reply
I am astounded! Many, if not most commenters, seem to favor Republicans!! Have you no eyes? Can you not see? Can you not read? Do you not realize that the last 6 years have brought America to the brink of ruin? Never have we had such a totally corrupt, dishonest, incompetent and thoroughly evil administration as this one!! NEVER!!
McCain is a Bush apologist---that alone is enough to make him POISON! Giuliani has a long trainload of baggage that will eventually roll over him---with God's help! Giuliani was a "good mayor" for about one week. Ask any thinking New Yorker!
If it means voting for "Socialist" Democrats or real Socialists, for that matter,---GIVE ALL REPUBLICANS THE BOOT--OR BOTH OF THEM! WE NEED A "PURIFICATION" IN WASHINGTON!!
However bad Democrats might prove to be, they are essential this time around!!
THINK, THINK, THINK!! And maybe, just maybe, with the help of God, we can undo the catastrophe that is/was George W. Bush and save our America!
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
dod
Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:18 PM
Over the last several years taxes have been down, housing has been booming, the stock market has been at historic highs, unemployment has been near historic lows.. All this despite an inherited recession and an attack on a major civilian population center on our own homeland (a one two punch that no administration in the last hundred years has had to deal with). Sure sounds like we need to change directions, huh?
Lay off the “poison” talk, the purification lines and your overdone drama and look at historical fact.
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
govt
Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:21 PM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
DoD
Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:56 PM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
DFAS
Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:58 PM
What about Iraq? What about the Deficit? What about the Surplus? What about the KATRINA?
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
SSA
Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:06 AM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
Various agencies
Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:32 AM
Regarding Iraq, have you noticed that the terrorists have not managed another attack on American soil since we took the fight to them? I think President Bush is doing a great job in fighting the war on terror. Now if we could only convince Congress and the President that an actual physical barrier across our southern border is the best way to defend ourselves from an invasion of illegals who come here for the freebies - medical treatment, education, subsidized housing and food, etc. and NOT to do jobs Americans "won't do," but rather jobs Americans "can't afford to do" 'cuz wages are depressed by illegals paid in cash (and therefore not paying income taxes of SS taxes) and laws that allow them, once legal, to bring in their whole family . . . . Give me THAT presidential candidate!
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
USDA
Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:03 PM
--Taxes down? For W's "Chosen People!" Not much for the rest of us! AND, our Dollar is now headed for Death Valley. China and Japan are our bankers!
--Housing? That loud noise you hear is housing going down the drain! Who will it take with it?
--Stock Market? There are about 55 Stock Markets in the world. Last year, America's were dead last!
--Every President should be so lucky as to inherit such a recession. When BUSH came in---we actually had surpluses!
Remember?
--There WERE two terrible attacks on our Homeland in 2001.
They were carried out and financed by Saudi Arabians: The great pals of the Bushes and Big Oil! Were those attacks PREVENTABLE? Only history will tell us! Bush won't!
You didn't mention them, but the two wars we're now losing, stealth inflation, and the poorest, most costly health care in ANY modern nation also deserve honorable mention in your administration's list of achievements.
THINK!! GIVE THESE BUMS THE BOOT!!
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
Small agency
Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:44 PM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
dod
Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:45 PM
The U.S. market has hit all time highs during the past few years, that is beyond dispute. Don’t cloud the issue with other markets in the world unless you want the us to try to control all the world’s markets. Speaking of the recession, it started with the tech bubble decline in early 00, Bush didn’t get to submit his FIRST budget till Nov 01. That’s how things work. Then came 9/11.
You really think big oil and Bush were behind the attacks? Please.. conspiracy theories are a dime a dozen.
Is the current adminstration is without fault? No.. but to portray the situation as you have exposes you as a partisan hack.
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
DOE
Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:50 PM
You want Government controlled healthcare?? Look at the VA.... that's how the Govt runs health care. Is THAT what you want???
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
DHS
Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:54 PM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
doj
Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:42 AM
Re: Comments on Presidential Candidates
DoD
Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:57 PM
The candidates
IRS
Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:25 PM
Post Reply
For all the the things said about Sen. Clinton I am surprised that Giuliani, a serial womanizer and McCain, a man who has never had an opinion that did not change to accommodate his audience, are looked upon highly. In fact most of the criticism laid upon Sen. Clinton could be placed on the Republican candidates. Why is it bad when a Democrat is strong but good if it is a Republican. They have certainly, over the past six years, showed us that they are experts in the abuse of power. We really need to say bye-bye to them, the sooner, the better.