Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 82
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Dress Codes, Tattoos, and Federal Employees: A Brave New World
Total Comments: 82
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $12.5762 | +0.0013 | +2.41% |
| F | $12.1248 | -0.0104 | +1.63% |
| C | $14.4899 | -0.1349 | -12.50% |
| S | $18.2226 | -0.2020 | -7.92% |
| I | $19.8863 | -0.3240 | -19.68% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.2656 | -0.1570 | -10.82% |
| L 2030 | $15.8058 | -0.1329 | -9.21% |
| L 2020 | $15.4005 | -0.1088 | -7.50% |
| L 2010 | $14.9685 | -0.0547 | -3.18% |
| L Income | $13.3648 | -0.0296 | -0.78% |
Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
Department of Veteran Affairs
Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:45 AM
Post Reply
Personal Hygiene/dress code is a real problem at our facility. Policies should be put in place to cover these issues. Some areas will address the issue but others just ignore the problem. I totally agree with your article. Employees should be clean, dress neatly and appropriate for the job and cheerful breath should be the norm. The monumental problem of personal hygiene is a serious issue and should be taken seriously by the supervisor. Perfume in patient care areas is unacceptable. Staff who wear perfume should be very discreet due to allergies of staff, visitors, patients and families. Supervisors just don't want to tackle these issues. Shame on them for being afraid to talk to staff with this problem. Maybe they shouldn't be supervisors.
Re: Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
DFAS
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 AM
Re: Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
USDA
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:12 AM
Re: Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
DOD
Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:16 AM
Re: Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
DFAS
Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:54 AM
Re: Dress Code/Personal Hygiene
USDA
Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:51 PM
shouldn't be supervisors
CHRA for the Army
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:12 AM
Post Reply
Yes, every problem stems from too many people who are supervisors who shouldn't be. They don't want to counsel, discipline, enforce the rules, etc. That is why we are stuck with NSPS also. Supervisors would shrug their shoulders and blame the system although there were always many ways to discipline and reward people. With NSPS, they will still say, "Can't do it!" (instead of, "I won't do it")when they truth is they don't have the determination and heart to deal with problem employees.
DRESS CODE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NAVAL BASE
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:12 AM
Post Reply
Yes, I agree for the most part we all should be considerate of wearing perfumes/colognes at your facility none. My biggest gripe is the attire that is being allowed by management they admire the cut off shorts or belly being exposed and breasts being exposed with low shirts especially by the contractors, it is very unsat. I don't agree with time changes in the world, they are forgetting the professionalism should remain in the workplace, where is the regualations? I really wish they would step up and do the right thing.
Tattoes & Body Piercing Distasteful
Forest Service
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:22 AM
Post Reply
I personally hate to see body piercing anywhere except the ears and tattoes that cover a large area of the body. Very small tattoes are ok. When I go to a restaurant to eat and I see employees covered with body piercing or tattoes, I leave. I can't help it because I just feel like the food is nasty. I guess hepatitis and aids comes to my mind. I've tried to get over it but can't. I ate at the Hard Rock Cafe once to try to get over this but the more I ate the bigger the food became and I just couldn't swallow the food or the idea of tattoes and body piercing. So if other eateries chose to go this route then I will only eat at home.
Re: Tattoes & Body Piercing Distasteful
DOD
Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:01 AM
Any extreme usually speaks of a problem. The guy with multiple piercings all over his face, for instance, has a glitch somewhere but may still be very talented at what he does. Someone who cannot eat because of another's tatoo or piercing is similarly glitched. For the most part neither one will suffer much and life will go on.
As to the perfume issue...well, that one is truly health related as those with allergies, asthma, migraines, etc, can actually be harmed by perfumes.
In a few years we will find out if the current tatoos & piercings are a fad or something that will go mainstream. I see respectable businessmen here with a stud in their ear and longer hair cuts than their military counterparts. All very neat and acceptable.
Re: Tattoes & Body Piercing Distasteful
VA
Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:53 AM
Re: Tattoes & Body Piercing Distasteful
OPM
Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:42 AM
Oh - and to the lady who can not eat in restaurants with tattooed employees - believe me when I say soap works just as well on tattooed skin as on non tattooed skin!
Re: Tattoes & Body Piercing Distasteful
DOD
Tue Jul 1, 2008 10:01 AM
And what's this "thinks they're all that" stuff? If you don't feel the same way, fine, but it is a reasonable reaction and has nothing to do with being "all that" (dumb figure of speech anyway).
a simple comment
One of many
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:29 AM
Post Reply
A subject that cannot be discussed without subjective comment... "ouch".
While I Agree...
DoD
Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:57 AM
Post Reply
w/all posters, I think what should be done is to propose a dress code unless all workers arrive for duty in appropriate attire.
I'm appalled that this is even an issue, but I know what everyone is talking about. Even I will come to work in jeans, but I know better than to expose myself publicly. I come to work to WORK. I also work in a professional job, but I'm aghast at what some of my colleagues consider appropriate office wear. Most of them are younger than I (under age 40), but that's still no excuse.
The tats and piercings suggest that these are younger feds. I wonder how they'll feel in 20 yrs and still be forced to wear the folly of their youth. Even I gave up my head scarves long ago--it's called "growing up."
Dress Code
USFS
Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:18 AM
Post Reply
I thought fragrances such as personal perfume, incense, or scented candles were kept in check because of the ADA. So many people are sensitive to fragrances.
Re: Dress Code
IRS
Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:57 AM