Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 62
Page 1 of 4

« Previous | Next »

Dance to the Music

Saving Social Security

Lead Archives Technician
NARA
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:33 AM

Post Reply

I have a better idea. How about we put a lock box on the Social Security Fund.

Re: Saving Social Security

JustaDud
Dod
Thu Aug 2, 2007 11:47 AM
Well said! Until our elected official stop "borrowing" from SS Fund, the problem will never be fixed.

Re: Saving Social Security

Manager
TSO
Thu Aug 2, 2007 3:36 PM
There is no pot of money or "fund" that SS taxes get collected in. That is a common misconception. SS taxes go into the general budget and get spent. So far SS taxes coming into the general budget exceed SS payments coming out of the general budget but that gap is closing fast and will soon go the other way. That is the core issue with SS going forward.

Re: Saving Social Security

Staff Accountant
dfas
Fri Aug 3, 2007 8:56 AM
Well said (About the fund). It's a legal fiction. Has anyone noticed that the politicians who run our school systems somehow don't get around to requiring courses in basic econimics? If they did, most of the politians would be out of business in no time.

Time to own the problem - SSI and Medicare

Program Analyst
Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:40 AM

Post Reply

I don't know how long it has been since the last increases in these premiums. I say premiums because Social Security and Medicare are just that, insurance against abject poverty and a total lack of health care availability for the older people of our country. I am a conservative therefore it does not appeal to me to pay higher taxes but when I think of this as insurance it changes my perspective and I see it as my problem and not the government's.

If the Social Security board of Trustees says we need a 1% increase to keep SSI solvent, what is the problem? How much inflation have we had since the last increase in the premium? And the cost of healthcare is widely know to have risen faster than the general rate of inflation so why wouldn't it make sense to increase the premium.

I'm a Boomer. I hate the idea that what has been there for my mother and will be there for me to so degree to not be there for my children and grand children. It is our problem and we need to own it.

Opt Out

Engineer
DON
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:50 AM

Post Reply

How about adding the option of allowing people to "opt out" of social security?

Personally, I think I can do a better job of managing my money than the SSA.

Re: Opt Out

Program\Management Analyst
Another Government Agency
Thu Aug 2, 2007 2:21 PM
I'm with you. Since we can't get rid of Social Security altogether (which I would prefer), those who want out should be able to opt out.

Re: Opt Out

SSA C.R.
SSA
Tue Aug 7, 2007 9:07 PM
The problem with folks who want to opt out, on the theory that they can manage there finances better than the government, is that they don't.

Then they aggravate the situation by bitterly complaining when they apply for their SS retirment benefit. "How am I supposed to live on $785.00 a month ?"

I can not tell you the number of times I hear this.

Re: Opt Out

admin
dod
Wed Aug 8, 2007 10:13 AM
SSA, you make a good point about most people not being adept financial managers. That being said, the return on SS is so dismal that even nearly zero risk money market investments beat it.

It is true that most people cannot manage an IRA or a 401K as well as they think they can, but to use this rational to defend the rate of return on SS is an apples to oranges comparison.

Re: Opt Out

SSA C.R.
SSA
Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:04 PM
True DOD ADMIN- the rate of return is poor. However the argument should be on how to improve the rate of return. Instead the political push is to get rid of social security. The constant bad mouthing of Social Security is designed to make it more palatable to get rid of it.

If they really wanted to fix it, they could do what several of the State systems do, buy stocks and bonds, in addition to the Government Bonds.b

Insolvency of SS

HR Specialist
BPA
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:51 AM

Post Reply

What about this STOP PAYING FOR WARS!

Re: Insolvency of SS

Admin Asst
DHS
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:55 AM
and just how do you propose we fight wars without paying for them?

Re: Insolvency of SS

Soil Conservationist
USDA
Thu Aug 2, 2007 1:22 PM
Another Bush basher with not apparent IQ.

Just what in the heck do financing wars have to do with the Social Security going insolvent? It does not matter whether the money is 'borrowed' to defend our troops or thrown away on welfare. Until legislation stops it there will be no money.

Re: Insolvency of SS

Staff Accountant
dfas
Fri Aug 3, 2007 8:47 AM
Good idea. We can just go around wearing signs on our backs that say, "PLease don't hurt me!"

I'm sure the rest of the world will honour that.

Re: Insolvency of SS

Comcerned Taxpayer
American
Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:44 AM
Let's stop getting into needless wars so we can spend the money domestically on the people who ante up the money. Let's stop giving away billions in foreign aid and help the American people.

Re: Insolvency of SS

manager
dhs
Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:58 AM
Concerned taxpayer, it's never good to get into needless wars. Any war needless or not is expensive. That being said, the subtle implication of your post that the current war is needless is wrong.

Encourage Boomers to Work/Incentivize Employers to Hire Boomers

Senior Research Fellow
Non-profit
Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:52 AM

Post Reply

As a "Boomer", I would like to continue working as long as possible. But I want to do meaningful work that utilizes my work experience, education, and expertise. After years of hard work and fiscal prudence, I am fortunate to be in the position that I work now for the challenge and other intrinsic reasons. If the younger generation is seriously concerned about social security, they should take positive actions to seek out the older generation for employment. I would gladly keep contributing to social security beyond the current retirement age. I am willing to do my part to keep the system afloat.

Re: Encourage Boomers to Work/Incentivize Employers to Hire Boomers

Staff Accountant
dfas
Fri Aug 3, 2007 8:46 AM
I appreciate your desire to do your part, but unfortunately it's like the victim of a stock scam saying "I'll do my part to keep the ponzi scheem afloat"

When I studied pension fund accounting, I learned that if social security were held to the same standards as a private fund, the administators would all be wearing orange jump suits.

Re: Encourage Boomers to Work/Incentivize Employers to Hire Boomers

Staff Accountant
dfas
Fri Aug 3, 2007 8:53 AM
But we're already incentivising boomers to stay on the job. "Keep working or you'll eat dog food" works for me!

As far as incentivising employers, let the economy do that. After all, that's what it's there for. If employers receive more value relative to the cost from older workers, they will hire the older workers.

The question is, how many workers feel the incentive to make themselves more valuable to their employers? I'm 54, and I'm just finishing an MBA. In most cases, an employer must choose between the wisdom of age, or the fresh knowledge of youth. I have both.

Social Security and Medicare

Biologist
DOI
Thu Aug 2, 2007 10:06 AM

Post Reply

Help save these two programs. In the 1980's I captured numerous illegal/undocumented workers with Social Security and Medicare stubs. Heck one day, I caught a 10 year old illegal fence jumper with 25 Social Security checks that he picked up at the just across the border U. S. Post Office. All the checks were to one P.O. Box. That was in the 1980's, I bet you it is worse today.

Re: Social Security and Medicare

Staff Accountant
dfas
Fri Aug 3, 2007 9:10 AM
If we don't do something immediately, the giant 500 lb chicken eating toad of South Africa might become extinct, so for God's sake, please, don't anybody do anything!

Increase SS tax limit

Medical Technologist
DOD
Thu Aug 2, 2007 10:22 AM

Post Reply

Why don't we increase the limit of salary subject to SS taxes? A lower paid individual has all of their salary subject, why not a higher paid employee? And why don't we repeal the unfair WEP and GPO offset while we are at it?

Re: Increase SS tax limit

JustaDud
Dod
Thu Aug 2, 2007 11:51 AM
Maybe you should stop and do some math. A person making more than $97,000/year pays about $6,045 in SS Tax; a person making $50,000 pays about $3,100 per year. Upon retirement, both will recieve approximately the same payment and in some cases, the higher paid employee will probably be in a higher income bracken which will LESSES his SS payment. So how can raising the maximum amount higher be fair? I'll bet you probably think the govt owes you something and feel it's the govt responsibility to make your comfortable while others have to pay it.
Total Comments: 62
Page 1 of 4

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.