Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Back Pay for Some Reservists Going Back to 1980?
Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2033 | +0.0011 | +0.64% |
| F | $13.5947 | +0.0048 | +1.95% |
| C | $13.6927 | -0.0027 | +3.59% |
| S | $17.9723 | +0.0233 | +9.18% |
| I | $18.5302 | +0.1287 | -0.04% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1474 | +0.0291 | +3.28% |
| L 2030 | $15.9136 | +0.0249 | +2.93% |
| L 2020 | $15.6956 | +0.0208 | +2.45% |
| L 2010 | $15.4351 | +0.0080 | +1.41% |
| L Income | $14.0647 | +0.0064 | +1.33% |
USERRA violations are still ongoing
Formerly ICE
Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:01 PM
Post Reply
I just recently filed my second USERRA case against ICE. I won the first one and the second case is so much more obviously a violation.
I requested accrued Sick Leave to attend physical examinations and procedures due to a serious heart condition. I provided test results and a letter from the VA authorizing the medical evaluation. (I was involved in the biochemical warfare testing on US Army personnel during 1975)
The DSAC asked if the medical conditional was the result of my military service. I replied that we weren't sure, but the tests would help tell.
The DSAC still would NOT approve the Sick Leave, so I had to retire to undergo numerous heart procedures including a quadruple bypass.
So why would a DSAC act like that - deny an employee accrued Sick Leave for serious heart condition just because it was the result of military service?
Was it because of anti-Vietnam sentiments against a Vietnam Era veteran? Or anti-Iraqi War sentiments against a current reservist?
Re: USERRA violations are still ongoing
Withheld
Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:54 PM
No punishment for USERRA violations!
Formerly ICE
Tue Aug 28, 2007 8:41 AM
Post Reply
Why are there so many USERRA cases? Because if a manager/supervisor violates USERRA there is rarely any punishment.
If a manager/supervisor sexually harasses someone, then it could negatively affect their career. The same with racism. However, when was the last time a manager/supervisor was disclipined for an obvious violation of USERRA?
It is the discrimination that you can get away with!
Discovery
USAF
Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:56 AM
Post Reply
Is there any way to get time and attendance records going back to 1980? If anyone has suggestions, I'd like to know how to do it.
Re: Discovery
NASA
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:27 AM
Re: Discovery
DOD
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:38 AM
Re: Discovery
Defense
Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:07 AM
Bonuses not being paid going back to 1979
IRS
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:13 AM
Post Reply
When I was honorably discharged from regular army in 1978, I enlisted into the Army Reserves with the condition that I would receive a re-enlistment bonus. I enlisted on 03/24/1979. Unfortunately I never received the bonus that I was entitled to. The paperwork that I signed couldn't be found. So I hope he wins.
Tell me about it!
Navy
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:35 AM
Post Reply
Yes, the burden of proof is entirely on the person improperly charged leave. I was luck enough to have most of my records going back to 1993, but not all.
You need to provide a civilian LES and military orders, or military LES to prove you were charged for weekends.
I got back 5 or 6 days so far, and resubmitted when they changed the statue of limitations.
The process takes a LONG time. Over a year since I submitted it.
Back Pay for Reservist back to 1980.
Fleet Readiness Center. Southeast (FRCSE)
Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:52 AM
Post Reply
How do we go about filing our information to get credit for this. Is there away we can get copys of our records if we are missing some of our orders.
Possible disparity in Butterbaugh decision
U.S. Postal Service - OIG
Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:07 AM
Post Reply
I have been informed by U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Law Department that the Courts' rulings and MSPB rulings and any subsequent "Butterbaugh decision" is not applicable to USPS employees because the agency is quasi-governmental and therefore does not have to adhere to such decisons due to some type of "exception rule." Fundementally, I thought that USERRA protected all guard/reservists. I retained all my reserve duty documentation and believe I can prove (support) my pre-1994 claim. Is this a correct assertion by the USPS?