Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 50
Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of 6
« Previous | Next »
The Windfall Elimination Provision and CSRS Offset Retirees
Total Comments: 50
Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of 6
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2033 | +0.0011 | +0.64% |
| F | $13.5947 | +0.0048 | +1.95% |
| C | $13.6927 | -0.0027 | +3.59% |
| S | $17.9723 | +0.0233 | +9.18% |
| I | $18.5302 | +0.1287 | -0.04% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1474 | +0.0291 | +3.28% |
| L 2030 | $15.9136 | +0.0249 | +2.93% |
| L 2020 | $15.6956 | +0.0208 | +2.45% |
| L 2010 | $15.4351 | +0.0080 | +1.41% |
| L Income | $14.0647 | +0.0064 | +1.33% |
WEP/CSRS Offset
irs
Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:23 AM
Post Reply
This is the most unfair policy. I cannot collect any social security from my husband if he dies but he can collect a good portion of my pension if I predecease him. I have a friend who collects her 1st husbands social security (they are divorced) and her 2nd husbands Government Pension and never worked a day in her life. Why is it only us CSRS employees are punished in this way. I make a very low salery and will never be able to retire.
Re: WEP/CSRS Offset
SPAWAR
Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:11 AM
Social security GPO
Department of Veteran Affairs
Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:40 AM
Post Reply
I am a retired government employee, who unfortunately, fall under the GPO rule. I think this is the most unfair law in the country. I didn't have enough social security quarters in but my husband, who passed away, paid social secuity for over 35 years and I should be entitled to my share of his social secuity but because I worked under the Civil Service I only get a very small amount of his social security.
As a result, since my grade was not very high when I retired, I get a limited civil service pension and was depending on the additional amount of his social security to have enough money to live on after retirement. I only get my pension which is not enough to live on. I am 69 years old and really not able to work due to physical problems and shouldn't have to even if I was able.
Therefore, I think this law needs to be amended not only for me for the other thousands of retirees who have to pinch pennies to try to survive.
Re: Social security GPO
Fed agency
Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:57 AM
Since most employers no longer offer pensions, it is up to the individual to save and use SS as it was intended - a supplement to their savings to fund their retirement, not as their sole source of funds during retirement. Even low-salaried folks can save if they are willing to make some sacrifices during their working years. GPO and WPO are not unfair - they just level the playing field.
where do I find the substantial earnings threshold?
US Army
Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:14 AM
Post Reply
I have been working a great job part-time (sometimes earning around $30K a yr. I loved your article. Where can I find out about the "substantial earnings threshold" that you mentionedin your article?
Thanks a lot!
Re: where do I find the substantial earnings threshold?
Department of the Army
Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:18 PM
That link provides an informaitonal paper. Here are the substantial year numbers:
1937–1950 $900
1951–1954 $900
1955–1958 $1,050
1959–1965 $1,200
1966–1967 $1,650
1968–1971 $1,950
1972 $2,250
1973 $2,700
1974 $3,300
1975 $3,525
1976 $3,825
1977 $4,125
1978 $4,425
1979 $4,725
1980 $5,100
1981 $5,550
1982 $6,075
1983 $6,675
1984 $7,050
1985 $7,425
1986 $7,875
1987 $8,175
1988 $8,400
1989 $8,925
1990 $9,525
1991 $9,900
1992 $10,350
1993 $10,725
1994 $11,250
1995 $11,325
1996 $11,625
1997 $12,150
1998 $12,675
1999 $13,425
2000 $14,175
2001 $14,925
2002 $15,750
2003 $16,125
2004 $16,275
2005 $16,725
2006 $17,475
Survivor benefits
Dept of Navy
Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:49 AM
Post Reply
I am close to CSRS retirement. My wife will be eleogible for Social Security. If I predecease her, will this WEP business affect the survisor beneifit, which costs about 8% of my annuity per year?
By the way, this WEP appears to be punishment for not converting to FERS in the 1980's. Remember the "thi sis a good deal" sales pitch?
Windfall
GSA
Thu Sep 27, 2007 9:57 AM
Post Reply
I retired 6 months ago and just received a letter fro SSA that I owe them $1700. because they paid me too much for the first 6 month because of the windfall provision and my monthly benefit will decrease almost $300.
I had notified them as soon as I received my first pension check.
I've been writng to Congress for years to repeal this unfair law. Now it really hit home.
windfall / CSRS Offset
DOE
Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:13 PM
Post Reply
Actually the Widfall provision doesn't really make much difference to CSRS Offset folks.
Your CRSR pension (the 2% X years X high 3) amount is reduced by the SS benefits you will recieve for the time you were working Offset. So if all your SS time is during the Offsett, if you SSbenifit is reduced, so is the amount of the offset to your CSRS pension.
If you had other work covered by SS, then you could actully benifit vs straight CSRS. This would be a very small group. For the rest, the total pacakage is just about the same, given all the rounding etc. done in the various calculations. Whatever "reduction" for the windfall, there should be a "reduction" of just about the same size in the offset of you CSRS pension.
Don't lose sight of the whole picture.
UNFAIR LAW
DCMA
Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:19 AM
Post Reply
When is this unfair law going to be repelled? We contribute to this country all our lives while we are young and working once we can't work any more they punish us for getting old. Our social security should have nothing to do with our CSRS retirement. Social security is Money we or our spouses contributed out of our hard earned wages. How can they be allowed to just take our money we invested into Social Security? is'nt that like stealing or something illegil? Something is very wrong here. Some one has to start fighting for us the People who support this country.
Re: UNFAIR LAW
BOR
Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:46 PM
Re: UNFAIR LAW
Fed agency
Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:04 AM
By the same argument, someone who pays into SS should only be able to draw out - at the maximum - the same amount they contributed. So, if you retire in your 60's (having contributed $50,000 over all your work years) and live into your 90's, you should only be able to draw out the $50,000 plus interest at maybe 3% APY. Of course it doesn't work like that. Some people die before they can ever draw a penny, and others live and continue to draw money long after THEIR contributions have been paid to them.
Be grateful your employer will have the funds to pay your pension as long as you live, and stop complaining.
Re: UNFAIR LAW
FAA
Thu Oct 1, 2009 8:21 AM