Re: Experience

Contract Specialist, to answer your question, the Clintons are not capable of adhering to the standards they demand those who oppose them adhere to.

Re: Hillary and Obama's Experience

Laura Bush would have been a better choice for President - she would have listened to other people and not just her own egomania. However, Hiliary Clinton does have experience as a Senator where Laura Bush does not - FACT!

Re: Hillary and Obama's Experience

Experience as a Senator does not mean you are a leader. Last time I checked we are electing a new leader and we will have to decide who is the best leader. Right now a platoon leader has more experience in leading than any of the three. We will have to decide who we think will be a good leader.

Re: what we really need

I agree. We should all consider backing John McCain. That way, we can forget about all this lieberal garbage and go back to the traditional values that made this country great, like attacking and destroying people and cities in far away lands.

McCain, I fully support your bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran threory of Presidential power. After that, there are at least 115 other countries that won't do everything the US tells them, so let's just wipe them out too.

Obama is too much of a coward to attack other countries on a whim (ie based on lies and propoganda like W did), and Hillary would only attack those folks via cruise missiles (it must run in the family).

So please, let's support 100 years of needless war and forget the Democrats.

Re: what we really need

While McCain's statement of 100 years could have been stated better, he was referring to the US's tendancy to keep troops in troubled areas where we have interests. WWII - We still have troops. Korea- We still have troops, Japan- We have troops. The troops are not coming home regardless of who is in office. We let millions die in Vietnam when we left because they simply wanted us to leave and not come over and bomb us. Muslim Terrorists want to take power in IRAQ and use the oil money to spread violence abroad. They will kill millions in IRAQ with help from IRAN and Syria to achieve that power. We can not afford that to happen for our Countries safety as well as our friends. We as Americans are part of the problem. We think only in the short term while these terrorists think in the long term with their planning and execution.

Re: what we really need

Engineer, that's a cleverly phrased rant but besides being packed full of partisan talking points and over the top generalities it's without substance of any kind. Nice try.

Re: what we really need

If nothing else, I drip with sarcasm. But it's what the American public has come to require and admire.

Headlines, and nothing else.

Heaven forbid that the general citizen stops doing what he/she is told and begins to think for themselves.

Until that time, I'll use headlines and over-the-top generalities. "get their attention first" I say, because "Americans believe the first thing they hear".

post script: I'm an independent. Neither Rep nor Dem. You'll see me attack both sides equally. Today, I'm just going with the last comment and remarking on the (obvious) Republican using over the top methods and rants and raves to attack liberals.