Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1

Handling an Adverse Action Reply Meeting: A Systematic Approach for Deciding Officials

Reply Meeting; aFarce

Engineer
HUD
Thu May 22, 2008 8:34 AM

Post Reply

I have been to two reply meetings, both times represented by my lawyer. The suspensions proposed obviously had no merit, they were simply stories made up by the racist Hispanic director of the office.
The deciding official was the supervisor of the proposing official. He did not care what the facts showed. He was going to support the director no matter what evidence was produced. In one case he was supposed to contact witnesses who would refute the alleged actions specified in the proposal. He never did follow up. How many times has the deciding official decided not to issue the proposed adverse action? I don't believe it has ever happened at HUD.
I filed complaints with the EEOC regarding both adverse actions. The Administrative Judge required the agency to expunge both suspensions as they had no merit. He noted that the manager "had a retaliatory animus toward the Complainant."
What happened to the manager who lied repeatedly both in her affidavit and at trial? NOTHING!

Reply Meetings are Kabuki Theater

Salior
DON
Fri May 23, 2008 5:18 AM

Post Reply

Kabuki theatre is known for the stylization of its drama and for the elaborate make-up worn by some of its performers. Same can be said of Reply Meetings.

Re: Reply Meetings are Kabuki Theater

Once-upon-a-Fed
Still working for Uncle Sam
Fri May 23, 2008 10:10 AM
Bravo! The perfect analogy!

Let's create an elaborate process to ensure that management gives the appearance of wise and independent decision-making when the outcome was previously decided.
Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.