Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 47
Page 1 of 3

« Previous | Next »

Getting a Handle on Leave: 15 Things Every Federal Manager Can Do to Improve Managing Leave and Attendance Issues

Be Careful

Fed Worker
DOD
Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:06 AM

Post Reply

With HIPPA it can be difficult with the medical conditions to remove an employee you suspect of malingering, and even if you are in the right you can still lose and be sued.

Re: Be Careful

Author
FedSmith
Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:44 AM
Under OPM regulations (5 CFR 339), in essence an employee may be required to furnish information or be treated as if no medical condition exists. HIPPA mostly involves the release of information regarding a patient without his or her specific permission. Apples and oranges. An Agency's communication is with the employee not the medical service provider so HIPPA has virtually nothing to do with Federal sector leave management.

Re: Be Careful

HR Officer
DOD
Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:32 AM
HIPAA generally applies to health care providers and insurance agencies not to federal supervisors trying to get a handle on their employee's use of leave. Bob provides some very useful and practical advise in this article.

Re: Be Careful

Labor Employee Relations Manager
VA
Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:58 AM
I disagree. The supervisor can request medical documentation that is enough to determine the employee's condition without intruding on privacy issues.

5 CFR 630.403 has changed in recent years and in some cases has made some contract language invalid.

Good article Bob.

Re: Be Careful

Consultant
Agency
Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:30 AM
If we have an employee that is using medical excuse to be consistently absent, we are not going to violate his/her privacy by invading their medical records.

We are going to ask them, the employee, to give us the material to support their claims.

If they fail to comply we are going to charge them with inability to maintain a work schedule and remove them.

HIPPA has nothing to say in that regard.

OPM Form 71

Human Resources Specialist
DLA
Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:06 AM

Post Reply

Minor note. It is no longer an SF 71.

Leave & attendance issues

HR Specialist, Worklife/OWCP
Exec Office for United States Attorneys, DOJ
Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:55 AM

Post Reply

This is a good time to mention Worklife programs. My personal experience....it takes me 1 hour to commute each way to work. If I have an appointment in the middle of the day, that is 2 extra hours of leave I need to take, plus the time for the appointment. If, however, I plan the appointment on my telecommuting day, it takes me less than 15 minutes to drive to any doctor or dentist, lessening the amount of leave I need to take to attend an appointment and the time away from my duties. If my appointment is with a professional regarding a home repair, I don't need to take any leave to open the door, return to my home office while the serviceperson completes the necessary repair to whatever household appliance is broken. I even participated in a teleconference once while carpet was installed in my living room (with supervisory approval).
Thank you for allowing me to share my ideas. I realize telecommuting is not for everyone, but it certainly has helped in my situation.

Re: Leave & attendance issues

Trench Worker
Interior
Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:40 AM
To HR Specialist at DOJ

If the Dinosaurs (supervisors) here would stop thinking of telework as a "vacation day," planning appointments on the telework day would be a very effective way of conserving leave. Worklife policies are great in theory, but unfortunately, the mindset toward telework is still antiquated. People around here still think people goof off during their telework day. I actually get more work done on the rare occasions that I am allowed to telework.

GIVE ME A BREAK

J
OM
Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:15 AM

Post Reply

Who is to say that sick leave is being abused? Federal law gives employees 104 hours of leave per year. We are allowed to take 12 sick days per year whenever we want for whatever reason we want. If you fell "sick" on a Monday or Friday, the day of the week is irrelevant. Work is stressful so getting sick on a Friday makes perfect sense to me! I have over 700 hours of leave in the bank that will disappear when I retire. That's like leaving $35,000 on the table when you retire (in today's pay).

I'm interested to know if taking my 700 hours is abuse. It's NOT! It's my leave and I can take a sick day whenever I want to. I am all for taking sick days to reduce stress or unwind so that my life can be extended well into my 90s or even 100.

Stop publishing articles on sick leave abuse and start to publish articles on staying healthy by using sick days to reduce stress and stay healthy! Your column makes no sense whatsoever. Let's maximize the work federal employees do!

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

examiner
IRS
Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:49 AM
First we get 13 8 hour days, not 12. I assume you just made a typo. That happens.
Second, sick leave is used for specific purposes. It is not like annual leave, which can be used for almost anything.
A good manager will let the worker use sick leave for unwinding if it done 2-3 times per year. If done frequently it is abusive. Technically, it is abusive, but a good manager will leave it alone if done rarely.
You, probably a FERS employee, have a good point about 700 hours disappearing. The idiots who created FERS did not think that sick leave would be abused, due to present conditions, rather than saved. The politicians should amend FERS to allow FERS employees similar sick leave benefits as CERS employees when they retire. Otherwise they encourage abuse.
I am a CERS employee with about 2600 hours of sick leave. I saved this leave to use as a short term disability policy.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

CBP Employee
CBP
Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:00 AM
I am a FERS employee. I have over 20 yrs of service and over 1400 hrs. of S/L. I'm a faithful employee who's never abused my leave in any fashion or manner. It's a great feeling knowing that in case I get sick or need an operation, I have a leave balance that will take care of me for over six months. I am very healthy and have maintained my health over the years. I've watched employees burn their S/L and later regret not keeping a healthy S/L balance. I've been taught that this is unwise and have viewed it as such.

So, the powers that "Be" currently say that when I retire, I will loose all my S/L, which is worth over 72K. Some have said that we (FERS) will get 50 cents on a dollar. That's still a raw deal.

Under the current retirement/leave policy, it's use or loose. I'm going to use it before I retire, unless the policy/law is changed to MY satisfication. Oh yeah, there are MANY of us...and we're getting VERY close to retirement age...

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

Analyst
DON
Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:20 AM
First off, there is no such thing as "stress leave". If you need a day off, you have annual leave for that, working permitting. You are very naive to think it's your sick leave to take when you want for whatever reason you want. Sick leave is specific for illness, medical/dental appointments, or caring for family members who are ill or have medical appointments. Supervisors must have evidence of the illness or what you could refer to as "acceptable medical" or a request for sick leave can truly be denied. Doctors don't determine what's acceptable; they don't approve sick leave...supervisors do. Rather than justifying the potential misuse of leave , we would all be better served if we use it for it's intended. If you are truly ill, take sick leave. If you want a day off to relax your brain from stress, that's what annual leave is for. Supervisors aren't "out to get you", they are trying to comply with rules/regs/laws to keep you and themselves out of trouble. Lighten up.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

AV Specialist
FSIS
Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:45 AM
To "Analyst" Don:
If you consider that stress is a mental health issue, then certainly it is legitimate to take sick leave. Too often in our "business is always right" culture we ignore the effects that policies have on our mental health. We're told to work harder or else we'll get fired or not get a raise. This is bunk -- it not only increases stress and anxiety but also causes physical health problems. Our own FEHB system recognizes no difference between physical and mental health problems. I think it's totally legit to take a mental health day and charge it as sick leave. It's cheaper in the long run than an extended stay in a hospital.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

EJ
DC
Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:32 AM
Those who argue that an occasional use of sick leave to take a "mental health day" is abusive should talk to a few doctors. Most doctors will tell you that a person with a stressful job is more likely to have high blood pressure, heart disease and various physical ailments. Taking the occasional day off can drastically lower your stress and have beneficial effects on your health. It's called health maintenance.

This could all be solved if the Gov. changed away from "sick" leave and "annual" leave, and just created a single leave category.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

Project Manager
DoD
Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:20 AM
No wonder sick leave abuse is the number on issue in discipline. Your position is a "pattern of abuse" if you always take off on Fridays and Mondays. You don't think about your co-workers having to take up Your slack because you are are not there to do your job.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

Manager
Treasury
Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:46 AM
J,

Sick leave is not an entitlement. As a manager, I'm sick and tired of hearing that claim. With that attitude, I'd look forward to the day when you have to ask for leave donations to address some medical condition and no one volunteers to help you.

You do however make a valid point about sick leave for FERS employees at retirement. Allow FERS employees to cash it out at 25-50% or, as someone else suggested, create a single leave category. FERS employees (and I'm one) might start to manage their leave better if all they had was annual leave....

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

Retired Manager
HHS
Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:27 PM
Having read the 32+ responses currently posted, it remains obvious to me that you feel you have the right to take S/L whenever you wish. While I agree that S/L for true stress/other mental health condition is appropriate, you seem to feel that if you want to go surfing, or to a movie on a Friday, Monday, or before or after a Holiday, it is your right to use S/L--because you worked Sooo hard during the week. Boohoo. That's what A/L or credit hours are for--and not at the last minute either, without good reason/light workload. If you think your co-workers agree with your laissez-faire approach to S/L, wait until you need to ask for donated leave when you have a real illness and 0 leave balance. I pity your supervisor, but question his or her effectiveness.
On the other hand, I totally agree with the comments on the inequitable treatment of S/L for FERS vs. CSRS employees--and I believe this will change if the Govt, is truly interested in real solutions to retention.

Re: GIVE ME A BREAK

Program Analyst
Pick One
Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:36 PM
I had a coworker who had a minor foot operation and was out for three months. He is a very nice guy...but has a "lazy" attitude in the office and very little motivation. At first, I thought he was out for three months going through painful physical therapy...with colleagues donating sick leave to him--but come to find out, he was at home, getting 40 hours of pay each week(not doing much at all), sitting down all day long. And then when he comes back to work, he complains about doing a "minor" assignment that took about fifteen minutes of his time. Give me a break is right! Sick leave abuse is real and this case was exagerrated.

Leave Problems

examiner
IRS
Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:37 AM

Post Reply

One thing that was left out is learning to work with people. Do not look at the rules and regulations in a vacuum, but see how it affects the work, the group, and the worker. If a worker calls in to take annual leave at the last minute and the effects are minimal, other than just telling the employee to try to notify the manager ahead of time of this, forget it. If, on the other hand, it is critical for the employee to be in, action should be taken.
The reason why I bring this up is because Mr. Gilson does not bring up the practical aspects of what he writes. He only talks about the so called legal items and how to get the employee. More than one manager will take the article without applying it properly to create animosity and poor working conditions.
In reference to another item in the article, I have never heard of disciplinary actions raising morale among the employees disciplined and, unless the disciplined person is very unpopular, the action could reduce morale.

Response to Gilson

Compliance Officer
OFCCP
Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:05 AM

Post Reply

Mr. Gilson:

As usual, you offer all the ways a manager/supervisor can document and attempt to be rid of an employee. You obviously would not be a supervisor that employees would need or want.

Remember, the Union was established to help protect the rights of employees and to keep managers/supervisors in alignment with not only the regulatory devices, but with the CBA as well. We have been around a long time defending managers and such that you cater to with "friendly advise". However, as you say, this is your opinion, well you know what they say about opinions.

Re: Response to Gilson

HR Officer
DOD
Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:26 AM
Actually, Bob would be the ideal supervisor: i.e., he would be conversant with all of the rules (including the CBA), he would communicate those rules to his employees, and he would consistently enforce those rules, holding those who don't follow them accountable.

Re: Response to Gilson

Consultant
Agency
Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:44 AM
I am continually amazed by those who think management does not have the right to discuss management tactics and how managers can use the tools and data at their disposal to manage.

This response - not the sub-respondent - clearly notes that writer thinks it is wrong for managers to do their job.

Hey!!!

Does your supervisor actually supervise you, or does he/she just sit around all day, doing the same job you do and just make more money than you?

And remember, this is a FREE forum designed to FREELY provide information to all that want to use it. The fact that it is geared towards managers is not wrong. The union could submit articles too.

Ooooppppsss!!!

I forgot. The unions are secret forums where if you go to their websites you have to be a dues paying member in order to access the secret sources of data.

Funny. Though the union demands to enter our meetings, we can't reciprocate.

I wonder why?

CSRS - what a deal

ron
DoD
Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:30 AM

Post Reply

Since I'm nearing retirement, I have been doing some calculations. My 1,948 hours of sick leave is worth $77,000 in todays dollars or I can sell it back and add about $1,474 a year to my retirement annuity for life. Today, I can enjoy an occasional mental health day for $317 a day or choose to sell it all back when I retire. If choose the latter, it will only take me 48 years to recover from the sale at the age of 103. It's pretty darn close to USE/LOSE for us too.

Re: CSRS - what a deal

Project Manager
DoD
Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:24 AM
You can not sell back Sick Leave in any retirement program. CSRS allows you to credit the time towards retirement but they will not give you a lump sum for it.
Annual leave yes. Sick leave no.

Re: CSRS - what a deal

HR Manager (Retired)
DoD
Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:56 AM
Go to your HR office and find out how you can get your sick leave credited as "service" thus increasing your retirement check. At retirement I had over 3300 hours of sick leave credited to my length of service thus earning me almost two years of service. My sick leave is earning me more money each month and earned me a higher percentage of my high three since it brought me very close to the 40 years of service limit. I always looked at your sick leave balance as a sign that I have been blessed with good health and a sure pay check in case I needed it.
Total Comments: 47
Page 1 of 3

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.