Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 74
Page 1 of 9

« Previous | Next »

Funding Tobacco Legislation by Changing the Thrift Savings Plan

Congress

stupid government employee
DOI
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:31 AM

Post Reply

Does Congress really believe we are so stupid to go along with their nonsense of borrowing from our TSP??? Give up some pork and fund this themselves.

Re: Congress

Resource Tech
USDA FS
Fri Aug 1, 2008 10:30 AM
You're absolutely right.
The TSP funds are not PUBLIC dollars.
If the government uses TSP funds for this Bill it would be considered stealing to me.
I'm trying really hard to save for retirement and don't want the government stealing from my account.

Re: Congress

Budget Analyst
Garrison
Mon Aug 4, 2008 6:55 AM
I completely agree with you. I bet if the government tried to do something like this with non-government employee 401k their be a national uproar. Once again we're getting penalized for being a government employee and for doing the right thing - working and saving to pay for our own retirement. We're not asking them to give us anything. We just want what we've worked for ourselves.

I wonder what's going to happen when a lot of TSP investors quit investing in or transfer their money out of TSP? I disagree with FedSmith that we will see a benefit in the long term. I imagine TSP having financial difficulties just like social security. Like a number of us keep saying if it isn't broken, don't try to fix it.

Let's Inform Congress Hands OFF the TSP

Compliance Officer
OFCCP
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:31 AM

Post Reply

FedSmith already has the website, how about asking federal employees what they think about Congress messing with the TSP and then sending the responses on to Congress?

Let's get the names of those in Congress supporting the changes to the TSP and get the word out about them.

Re: Let's Inform Congress Hands OFF the TSP

Scientist
DoD
Fri Aug 1, 2008 11:52 AM
This legislation is not yet law. The Senate has not yet voted on its version of the tobacco legislation (S 625), which does not currently include TSP provisions. The Senate may not vote on the legislation before the end of the congressional term. If the legislation does pass in the Senate, differences between the House and Senate versions would have to be negotiated in committee. The President could also veto the legislation if the Senate does not pass it with a veto proof majority.

I support automatic enrollment of new employees and a Roth option for the TSP. I am going to lobby my representatives to remove the provisions allowing new investment options without proper oversight.

tobacco and our tsp

poor peon
usda
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:42 AM

Post Reply

I put a comment in the other article about the changes to our tsp. i read the article about this tobacco thing then. Not one person came back with any comments. you should have put strobe lights on the title of the article. i wanted to stay working for the government until i retired. now, i just want out. it is not worth it. we get no respect from other government agencies and the public hate us. they think all we do is sit around and drink coffee and surf the internet all day. maybe some offices have the time to do that. we do not. we are overworked and underpaid. and now congress wants to steal the money i put away so i can buy food when i am older. it is kind of like pooping on us because we actually thought about our future. tell me how to get my money out of tsp now and into my own roth ira in a credit union.

TSP funding tobacco regulation

pharmacist
veterans affairs
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:42 AM

Post Reply

I'm still a bit unclear, I think.

Does hte report say that the funding will come from increased taxes because federal employees will move their savings from pretax money in the regular funds to after tax money and put it in a Roth?

On the face of it, that seems stupid for us to do, but on the other hand, we may see a decrease in tax furhter in the future when those same employees begin drawing on their tax free Roths.

Or am I misunderstanding the whole thing?

pay now or pay later

software engineer
NAVAIR
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:45 AM

Post Reply

The gist that I got is that the congress says the funding will come from paying taxes up-front instead of at the time of withdrawal (on the newly opened roth accounts). This doesn't generate revenue, it only changes the period that the reveneue is generated. If the window that is looked at is pushed out to the period when the money is expected to be withdrawn, doesn't that change the openning of the Roth option make it look more revenue neutral? Smoke and mirrors.

Re: pay now or pay later

voice of reason
treasury
Fri Aug 1, 2008 11:59 AM
All this seems to me to be is a plan where additional ( earlier ) tax revenue would be generated by Federal employees if they 1) converted their TSP account to a Roth IRA ( owing tax now versus later ) or 2) Federal employees choosing to put their retirement money in a Roth TSP plan - where they would pay the tax on their contributions when they contributed rather than when they took their money out. No one is taking any money from anyone ! Federal employees would have a choice on whether to choose a Roth TSP or whether to convert their existing TSP account.
Relax everyone ...
This is an issue of how money Congress receives is spent - and that is an altogether different issue.

This just bugs me.

IA
ATF
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:47 AM

Post Reply

What gives them the right to get their hands into our money in any form? This should not be allowed. I have high doubts that anything they do with "our" money will do any of us any good.

Funding Tobacco Legislation with Changes to TSP

Supr Hydraulic Engineer
DOI
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:52 AM

Post Reply

Can you say Class Action Lawsuit

Re: Funding Tobacco Legislation with Changes to TSP

Management Analyst
DHHS
Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:02 AM
Wait, I think the TSP is getting too much attention and that usually does not bode well for the Fed investors. First, the number of times we could make changes in our contributions from fund to fund was changed and charges applied if we went over those numbers of changes. Now, offer us a Roth IRA so we can pay taxes now (higher than when we would be retired in most cases) so more taxes are generated now. How about the future when all these boomers are in a Roth and getting their tax-free annuities - who's going to pay taxes then? I think our Congress is often short-sighted.

My vote is to keep their hands off OUR retirement plans. Union officials go to jail for that!
Total Comments: 74
Page 1 of 9

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.