Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 21
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Defining "Fired" From Any Job
Total Comments: 21
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $12.7463 | +0.0008 | +0.04% |
| F | $12.5956 | +0.0340 | +0.12% |
| C | $10.4853 | -0.3174 | +0.49% |
| S | $12.3632 | -0.4115 | +1.28% |
| I | $14.3592 | -0.2050 | +0.73% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $12.5675 | -0.2638 | +0.63% |
| L 2030 | $12.6930 | -0.2335 | +0.55% |
| L 2020 | $12.9186 | -0.1958 | +0.47% |
| L 2010 | $13.8674 | -0.1008 | +0.25% |
| L Income | $12.8084 | -0.0642 | +0.19% |
Ingenuity
IRS
Tue Aug 5, 2008 8:10 AM
Post Reply
If you overlook the stupidity and mendacity of this woman, you have to give her credit for ingenuity. "I was filling out a federal form so the question must have referred only to previous federal jobs. Therefore, I can ignore the other four times I was fired." In some agencies, this type of thinking would qualify the applicant for a high management position.
Re: Ingenuity
Federal
Tue Aug 5, 2008 8:46 AM
Re: Ingenuity
AF
Tue Aug 5, 2008 9:36 AM
If this woman has a degree of some kind I wonder where/how she got it.
Re: Ingenuity
DoD
Tue Aug 5, 2008 4:05 PM
Re: Ingenuity
Agency
Wed Aug 6, 2008 2:33 PM
HR Retired Manager: HR Specialist is right, in the context of the initial statement, and others of similar ilk. And hey, he is somewhat right because this case has the makings of many that the unions defend and that HR and Management must pull hair over. And in closing, don' be so hard on the HR Professionals that must deal with real crap and stupidity on a regular basis. The last manager I had did that and routinely fed us the same bilge that is provided here. End result, the union ran the service, almost, and the Specialists were sick. Now, HEEHEEHEE... I am the manager, and guess what, the Great Specialists working for me (WITH ME) actually work with the unions by not giving away the farm.
And in closing, it is likely you know nothing of this Specialist and are in no position to judge.
And YES, there are LOTS of stupid union people out there,
Managers too.
Re: Ingenuity
DoD
Fri Aug 8, 2008 9:25 AM
Re: Ingenuity
DOD
Fri Aug 8, 2008 11:36 AM
She is lucky she wasn't charged with a crime
OPM
Tue Aug 5, 2008 8:51 AM
Post Reply
This woman was a terrible liar. The question asks about being let go by "any job," implying both private and public sectors. If she is truly illiterate (or misunderstood the question), she could have asked questions when the investigator came about what the question encompassess. That is the point of the background interview--to tie up any loose ends. She is also lucky that she was not charged with a felony. It is a crime to lie on the background questionnaire (title 18, U.S. code, section 1001).
Re: She is lucky she wasn't charged with a crime
DOD
Tue Aug 5, 2008 10:15 AM
Oh PULEEZE
DOE
Tue Aug 5, 2008 9:19 AM
Post Reply
Fired is fired no matter whether it was a civilian or FED job. She lied and knew she was lying.
I Already make It Broader
DOD
Tue Aug 5, 2008 9:34 AM
Post Reply
Let's included as "fired" the politicians who get voted out of office. Many of them are not worthy of my vote, & will get fired come January 2009. REMEMBER....these elected officials work for us & are our employees!!!
Re: I Already make It Broader
DA
Tue Aug 5, 2008 11:42 AM
Fired
DoD
Tue Aug 5, 2008 1:15 PM
Post Reply
Fired 4 times in 5 years? Sounds like a stellar employee to me. Being fired once could be a bad boss or supervisor, but 4 times in 5 years shows a real bad pattern.
She probably figured that nobody would actually check with the employers that she put down on her application. Lots of prospective employers never check references and it's amazing what people lie about and get away with. In this case, I'm glad that her references were checked and this dirtbag was discharged before she had a chance to become another govt. problem child.
Come On
DoD
Tue Aug 5, 2008 3:53 PM
Post Reply
Does she really expect anyone to take her point of view. The question is pretty straigh forward. Bottom line she lied on her application.
FIRING
DHHS
Tue Aug 5, 2008 3:56 PM
Post Reply
i am surprised that her past employers were even able to give out this information regarding being terminated. many employers today can only provide information regarding ending salary, position held and date of seperation.
Re: FIRING
DHHS
Tue Aug 5, 2008 4:20 PM
Re: FIRING
SSA
Tue Aug 5, 2008 7:39 PM
Re: FIRING
Agency
Wed Aug 6, 2008 2:42 PM
This information came off of a background investigation.
Vastly different than being asked by a prospective employer.