Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 194
Page 3 of 10

« Previous | Next »

Obama Leads Among Readers for First Time

election

manager
blm
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:11 AM

Post Reply

Let's get real. This "experience" ploy is a great one. All I read is Sarah Palin is not experienced. Has any one taken their eyes off media propoganda and looked for themselves at the candidates? Do you honestly feel a 100 plus days in the senate, being a community organizer, and certainly being back by strange bedfellows really is the experience needed for the presidency? We have 3 senators, a junior one (who wants top spot) and two senior ones and one person who has governed. Even a little governing is better than none. I am concerned Obama has a whole different agenda for us all - it is called socialism. We are being fed socialism in little bits now, with him it will be big chunks. Who do you think will pay for all his programs? Tax payers - you and me. The people pulling his strings (surely you don't think he got to this point on his looks, or playing the race card) are one world socialist, its obvious - please do your homework before making this crucial decision

Re: election

usda
worker
Wed Oct 1, 2008 12:57 PM
at least he is a "socialist" for the people and not a "socialist" for the financial community

Re: election

Agent
IRS
Wed Oct 1, 2008 3:26 PM
By your reference to socialism I am interpreting it to mean his plan to provide health care insurance for all. Do you honestly think that we are not already paying for those that cannot afford health insurance? When they get sick and end up in the emergency room of the hospital, who do you think pays? That's why medical care is so expensive. We all pay through higher medical costs. Who pays for the lost productivity when an uninsured employee is out of work due to illness? Remember the old Fram Oil Filter commercial, you can pay me now, or you can pay me later.

Re: election

Editor
DoD
Fri Oct 3, 2008 10:07 AM
Agent IRS - that's exactly the problem ... the fact that we're already paying for others' medical bills is only going to get WORSE if Obama is elected and his socialist ideas are adopted. Geez - even Hillary finally had to concede defeat when her glorified health plan didn't pan out. Now here we go all over again.

And I don't even want to address the poster who doesn't seem to care about socialism as long as it's "for the people" - delusional voters like him/her just plain scare me.

Experience

Financial Analyst
DLA
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:14 AM

Post Reply

The Presidency is a rather unique position for which being a senator, representative, or governor doesn't prepare one. The only position with true experience is an active Vice President. Looking at resumes, I'm more impressed with Obama/Biden than McCain/Palin. I supported McCain in 2000 but the man I see today has few of the characteristics I supported then. I just want a clean election with the winner taking the popular vote.

Choice

IET
DOD
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:24 AM

Post Reply

I too feel that we are having to choose between the lesser of two evils once again!! But voting for change doesn't mean it will be a good change. We should all be trying to vote based on solid information, not party, not race, not gender. Please, make an informed choice people of America! I am very, very scared for our United States! We are just giving it away...

Your bias is showing

Info Officer
U.S. Forest Service
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:27 AM

Post Reply

Anyone reading the comments you included with this article would be hard-pressed to believe that Obama actually got more support than McCain. 6 of the first 7 comments were pro-McCain and the other was neutral. You have also been consistently featuring a pro-McCain article in your 'Previous Headlines' section. Even the first paragraph of this article highlights that McCain lead in the last two surveys. I'd appreciate a more even-handed approach so your 'information' doesn't favor McCain over Obama.

Re: Your bias is showing

Analyst
DLA
Wed Oct 1, 2008 11:15 AM
You took the words right off my keyboard!

Obama Leads Among Readers for First Time

District Director
Department of Labor
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:30 AM

Post Reply

Obama is an agent of change and is the future of this country. We can either get started now or later, but change is coming nevertheless. If the current state of affairs, both foreign and domestic, doesn't have us all clamoring to get started now, then I am afraid we are beyond hope. Be honest, McCain is more of the same. We just cannot afford four more years like the past eight years. Senator Obama graduated from Columbia and Harvard. He spent 8 years as a State senator; and is currently a U.S. Senator. My fellow coworkers, this isn't a thin resume. He will serve us well. Be not afraid!

Re: Obama Leads Among Readers for First Time

Diversity Manager
DOL
Wed Oct 1, 2008 8:12 PM
His tuition to Harvard was paid for by the Saudis

Re: Obama Leads Among Readers for First Time

Worker
DoD
Thu Oct 2, 2008 8:29 AM
What exactly is an "agent of change?" I mean, he hasn't demonstrated change in his career so far, so what makes this different? How does one become a "agent of change?" Is there a special test or evaluation? Do you drink a magical potion? How does it happen?

NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

LOW LEVEL EMPLOYEE
VA
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:34 AM

Post Reply

YAY!--the FedSmith has now jumped on the main stream media bandwagon!!!!---"let's tell the people that Obama is leading and it will be so." And as ignorant as the American people are they will BELIEVE it and just go ahead and voter for the concieved 'winner!'--

Forces Command 'Mgt anaylst' tells it like IT IS----all you fools who want someone who has such DEPLORABLE friends, associates, whatever you want to call them, as Obama should NOT even be running for an office. What the h*** is WRONG with people that they can't understand that?????

And wasn't he sooooooo respectful during the debate--addressing someone of John McCain's caliber and stature as 'John'----hope the leaders of foreign countries can 'appreciate' his "charm."

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

Sr. Scientist
DOE
Wed Oct 1, 2008 12:30 PM
The very fact that you describe yourself as a "LOW LEVEL EMPLOYEE" reads/speaks volumes.

Your comments are well grounded by your lack of self-esteem ... and most easily scrolled beyond to those comments of value.

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

HR Consultant
been there/done that
Wed Oct 1, 2008 12:33 PM
Low Level: So as I understand your position, FedSmith has joined the ranks of the mainstream liberal media and is lying about the results of its poll. I suppose the results from its August poll that showed McCain 15% ahead were also fabricated, so Obama's current lead would appear even more dramatic.

Regarding Sen. Obama calling Sen. McCain by his first name, they are Senate colleagues and this is how Senators address each other. McCain showed himself to be an arrogant old white man in the mold of Cheney by his condescending approach to his colleague. I'm afraid you are destined to remain "low level".

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

usda
worker
Wed Oct 1, 2008 1:00 PM
they are both Senators and have worked together before. I guess that allows the first name basis

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

Worker
DoD
Thu Oct 2, 2008 8:34 AM
Sr Scientist,
Be carful what you say. Many of the "low level" people that you demean and belittle may actually be above your work stature. Don't forget, without us, you would probably be lost and wouldn't survive. I mean, who would actually make things work?

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOO BAMA!!!!!!!!!!

Nameless, Faceless Nobody
DOD
Thu Oct 2, 2008 10:15 AM
While I am not in agreement with Low Level's comment, I think that any of these polls are subject to exactly the same attacks no matter who is ahead, I found Sr. Scientists ad hominum (sorry, can't make the italics happen,) attack obnoxious.

More of the US poplulation is on our level. We don't have fancy degrees or titles but we are the platform those who get the glory stand on. Our opinions count for we DO VOTE! We do care about the issues. We actually have reasonable discussions as to why we believe as we do.

On this blog I have seen some pretty rancorous words from apparently educated and high-level feds. I have also seen reasonably considered posts from apparently lower-level support people. Assuming someone who isn't a scientist or a GS 13+ is putting themselves down to simply call themselves how it is shows an appalling sense of elitism on your part.

Rant over.

McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Federal Worker
Federal Agency
Wed Oct 1, 2008 10:36 AM

Post Reply

McCain wants to RAISE my taxes. What he proposes is that my current medical benefits be subject to the income tax. McCain wants tax cuts only to rich businesses, with the idea that the money saved on tax cuts is supposed to "trickle down" to us workers -- who of course, if McCain is elected and his plan goes through -- will have to pay more income taxes on medical benefits. So why in the world would I vote for McCain, who wants to RAISE my taxes?

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Worker
DoD
Thu Oct 2, 2008 8:36 AM
Federal Worker,
ALL politicians will raise your taxes.

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Network Tech
USAF
Thu Oct 2, 2008 11:04 AM
Uh, do you really believe that big business pay taxes? Of course, they don't - WE pay taxes. Big business pass their tax cost on to us in the form of higher prices for goods and services. Taxes are an 'expense' for the business, all which goes into their 'cost' of their product/service... Invisible taxes WE pay as part of goods and services we purchase. Raising business taxes will raise prices... unfortunately, lowering taxes doesn't always equate to lower prices... business will take profit where ever they can - after all, that's why they're in business...

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Federal Worker
Federal Agency
Thu Oct 2, 2008 1:41 PM
And it's perfectly OK for McCain to advocate raising taxes of workers? Believe me, my taxes are far too high as it is. I don't need McCain adding more of a tax burden on my medical insurance.

Anytime anyone asks McCain about this proposed tax raise, he quickly changes the subject.

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Worker
DoD
Thu Oct 2, 2008 3:34 PM
And Obama has stated that he will raise taxes on individuals to pay for his promised programs? Is there anyone out there who can tell me one President in the last 100 years that did NOT raise taxes (or shift the taxes to business thereby increasing the cost of the goods) during his term(s)? ALL politicians raise taxes.

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Federal Worker
Federal Agency
Fri Oct 3, 2008 12:48 PM
"And Obama has stated that he will raise taxes on individuals to pay for his promised programs?"

Really? When? Obama has said that he wants to let Bush's tax cuts expire for those making over $250,000 a year. For those making less, he is in favor of retaining these tax cuts.

Whereas McCain's tax raise would hit working people, such as those of us who work for the federal government -- whether someone is a G-1 or a G-15 or higher. And yes, he said that there would be a "$5000 tax deduction." However, money paid out by employers for health premiums goes a lot higher than that. And of course in a few years, we could have another "emergency" -- such as another war, or perhaps another welfare scheme for rich corporations similar to what we're getting now. And -- whoosh!! The $5000 tax credit disappears. But the higher tax will remain. NO THANK YOU!

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Worker
DoD
Fri Oct 3, 2008 2:52 PM
Ah yes, those promised programs just pay for themselves. Do you really think YOU won't pay more, regardless of who the next President is? If the cost of business goes up (increased taxes), the costs of the service or goods goes up.

Re: McCain wants to RAISE your taxes

Federal Worker
Federal Agency
Tue Oct 7, 2008 10:22 AM
One place where we'll save loads of money is when we stop sending trillions of dollars down the Black Hole in Bagdhad. McCain wants to keep dropping money down this black hole, Obama wants to put an end to this huge expense.

Again, anytime anyone mentions McCain's proposal to raise the taxes of working stiffs (such as myself) on their medical benefits, I notice that the McCain supporters constantly change the subject.
Total Comments: 194
Page 3 of 10

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.