Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 162
Page 3 of 9
Page 3 of 9
Who Will Receive Your Vote for President of the United States?
Total Comments: 162
Page 3 of 9
Page 3 of 9
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2102 | +0.0011 | +0.69% |
| F | $13.6263 | -0.0136 | +2.19% |
| C | $13.8822 | -0.0041 | +5.03% |
| S | $18.1185 | -0.0839 | +10.07% |
| I | $18.5861 | -0.1653 | +0.26% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.2757 | -0.0497 | +4.10% |
| L 2030 | $16.0266 | -0.0418 | +3.66% |
| L 2020 | $15.7897 | -0.0336 | +3.06% |
| L 2010 | $15.4792 | -0.0113 | +1.70% |
| L Income | $14.1011 | -0.0086 | +1.59% |
Who Will Receive Your Vote for President of the United States?
Staunch Independent
DFAS
Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:28 AM
Post Reply
McCain & Palin have my vote. I could never bring myself to vote for Obama. What has become of our country. How fast people have forgotten 9-11. We won't have to worry about the economy if we are all dead from terrorists, that will have no problem getting to us. We have gotten so greedy over money that we have forgotten our security problems in this country.
Vote
DoD
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:00 AM
Post Reply
I am an independent and considered both candidates and find I disagree with both on a number of issues. However, I will be voting for Obama. McCain's hiring of Rove associates, selecting Palin (part time mayor of a town of less than 5000 who brought in an administrator to perform day to day functions, supported bridge to nowhere before she was against it, etc) and the number of vile and untrue emails attacking Obama that I have recieved from Republican friends has convinced me that McCain is too closely linked to Bush' ethics and policies (which I oppose) and at age 72 selecting Palin as VP clinched which candidate was to receive my vote. I think Obama presents the best chance to get a bipartisan answer to the problems we face.
Obama For President? You've GOT to be KIDDING!!
FAA
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:13 AM
Post Reply
Obama SCARES me! How can you vote to put a man into the position of Commander in Chief who won't even acknowledge or say a pledge of allegiance to the flag now?!?!?? Plus, to do everything that he's promised to do, he will have to raise taxes astronomically. If he's elected, you'd better enjoy that wealth redistribution check when you get it, because you're going to be giving it all back - PLUS some - in new taxes shortly!
Re: Obama For President? You've GOT to be KIDDING!!
FAA
Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:46 PM
Please, don't quote Rush L or the Drudge report for this item. something factual would be sufficient.
Here is the problem with the party systems, by the way, and the average American voter. The tendency to believe either-or is killing us. Obama is either God or satan. He's good or bad. No middle road.
Voters hear their party say something like the Obama quote, and will repeat it as absolute truth without even verifying if it's true - just like the "attacked McCain supporter at the ATM story". All made up, but repeated by "authority" (Matt Drudge, et al) so it must be correct.
Please American voters, please. Read the facts (there are a dozen good fact checker sites out there) and don't let Rush/Air America decide for you.
Re: Obama For President? You've GOT to be KIDDING!!
VA
Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:58 PM
Re: Obama For President? You've GOT to be KIDDING!!
Navy
Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:03 AM
Executive Experience
DHS USCG
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:14 AM
Post Reply
Since so many are willing to question the experience of Mrs. Palin, who is a state govenor, I'd like to ask a question?
WHAT HAS OBAMA EVER DONE. I have never seen that he has accomplished anything. He's been campaigning for president since he was elected to congress. He's missed many of the votes or voted present on controversial issues. He came up through Chicago machine politics. He's an extreme socialist/marxist.
Paid for by big money from folks like George Soros.
Sorry folks, you've been sold a bill of goods by big money and media glitz. Unfortunately we are all going to pay for it. The crazy three: Obama, Pelosi and Reid, the new three stooges.
Re: Executive Experience
Education
Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:04 AM
Re: Executive Experience
Retired
Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:54 PM
Re: Executive Experience
Navy
Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:35 AM
1. 5 times elected to the U.S. House of Representatives
2. Served as Minister to Russia
3. 12 years in the U.S. Senate
4. Served as Secretary of State
5. Served as Minister to Great Britain
Qualifications of candidate #2
1. Eight years in the Illinois state legislature
2. One term in the U.S. House of Representatives
Candidate #1 is James Buchanan who became the 15th President of the U.S. (1857-1861)
Candidate #2 is Abraham Lincoln who became the 16th President of the U.S. (1861-1865)
Who was the better Commander-in-Chief?
Buchanan- up until "W" considered by many historians as the worst President.
Lincoln - considered as one of, if not the best, President we've ever had.
Lesson Learned - Judgment trumps experience!!!
Re: Executive Experience
DON
Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:54 PM
Obama is no Lincoln.
Election
Justice
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:16 AM
Post Reply
Voted for none of the above. Left it blank. Neither are acceptable.
DOD is afraid of...
FAA
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:29 AM
Post Reply
First, OBAMA is NOT against defense of nation...just stupid, unfounded wars. (Let's not forget the Wienberger and Powell doctrines)
Second, if we took the capabilities of the DOD and transformed just a fraction of it's mega-structure into developing technology to fight against our need to import oil, we would be much more secure. That would offset the clear fear of job security disguised as national security. (see USAF Counselor)
Third, IMHO, war based economies are doomed to failure.
I think our military has to be between the "mean lean" machine and the current war levels. I also think that we can be MUCH smarter in how DOD (or any other government organization) spends money.
Vote
OPM
Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:57 AM
Post Reply
McCain/Palin