Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 77
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Faster Promotions Coming for Some Federal Employees
Total Comments: 77
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2033 | +0.0011 | +0.64% |
| F | $13.5947 | +0.0048 | +1.95% |
| C | $13.6927 | -0.0027 | +3.59% |
| S | $17.9723 | +0.0233 | +9.18% |
| I | $18.5302 | +0.1287 | -0.04% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1474 | +0.0291 | +3.28% |
| L 2030 | $15.9136 | +0.0249 | +2.93% |
| L 2020 | $15.6956 | +0.0208 | +2.45% |
| L 2010 | $15.4351 | +0.0080 | +1.41% |
| L Income | $14.0647 | +0.0064 | +1.33% |
A step in the right direction.....
Fed Agency
Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:46 AM
Post Reply
This is definitely a step in the right direction toward creating an environment that focuses on and rewards performance instead of longevity. I came into Federal service two years ago as a GS-13. My manager at the time found that I out-performed all of his GS-14 level staff and attempted to promote me "early". Of couse HR quickly told him NO. I was promoted after one year to a GS-14 and after a year at a GS-14, was recently promoted to a GS-15. The bottom line is that I am a high performer and should have been recognized for my performance without regard to "time-in-grade". This is a good move by OPM. Now if we could just get rid of the GS system all together and move the entire government to pay-for-performance! I look forward to the day! Maybe then we could get rid of all the high-graded (GS-14) slackers that I observe on a daily basis.
Re: A step in the right direction.....
Outside the beltway
Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:34 AM
Re: A step in the right direction.....
One of the Pay For Perf Agencies
Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:19 AM
I am one of the stellar performers and I have been financially rewarded for it but the system is a problem. It is highly subjective, dependent upon the assignments that you receive, your supv's mood..... And you had better keep all that in the forefront or your pay will fall behind the annual adjustment given for GS employees. If you raise an alternative or object to the course your supv has outlined you had better hope that it isn't remembered at appraisal time.
I am hoping that Obama takes us back to the GS system as he has threatened. I have a strong preference for performing well simply because it is who I am, not always running like a rabbit to ensure that I make my supv happy. Plus if a system is going to improve you have to be willing to take chances and this system does not reward innovation; it rewards obedience.
And we don't get rid of the poor performers either.
Re: A step in the right direction.....
No comment
Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:28 AM
Poor performance makes you ineligible for a higher grade and subject to removal; exemplory performance makes you eligible for an award; acceptable performance plus one year of specialized experience will make you eligible for promotion.
Presumably, most people are brought into the govt service at the highest grade that they qualify for.
Faster Promotions
Rural Development
Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:50 AM
Post Reply
That is all well and good except when it comes to this Agency. They prefer hiring and promoting individuals from the outside and having the lower grade employees "assist" them.
Re: Faster Promotions
VA
Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:50 AM
Re: Faster Promotions
VA
Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:25 AM
Re: Faster Promotions
DOL
Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 PM
Re: Faster Promotions
USDA, Rural Development
Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:04 PM
Re: Faster Promotions
USDA
Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:14 AM
Re: Faster Promotions
DOI
Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:28 AM
We understand how the hierarchy works. The point that "USDA Rural Development" makes is that some offices will bring in outsiders for higher grades rather than promote some qualified individuals from within, regardless of what rules are added, removed, or changed. It's another facet of the "buddy system."
Re: Faster Promotions
VA
Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:11 PM
who've been around awhile. Nothing could be further from the truth. Visit your DOI HR function & get some basic info about your merit promotion program, qual standards & related staffing matters.
Re: Faster Promotions
CIS
Tue Dec 2, 2008 9:17 AM
Maybe someday they will make rules that allow the people who actually DO the work to get the credit and pay they deserve.
PROMOTIONS
SUPPLY DEPT NAVY (FISC)
Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:11 AM
Post Reply
to whom it may concern i've been a gs-05 since 1989 and i have heard the same excuse on promotions but the managers only promote their
buddies i am also a vietnam vet, if your a vet you get treated like a second class citizen, i want some answers. i 'm attach to one of bases south of andrews afb.
Re: PROMOTIONS
DoD
Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:27 PM
Re: PROMOTIONS
DOL
Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:44 PM
That's why NSPS is so needed to stop this inbreeding and cronyism.
Re: PROMOTIONS
DOD
Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:04 AM
Some of us are very good at what we do but do not and cannot get degrees. I may have to sit at a computer every night and click buttons to get an online degree, (worthless in practice.) Money and time are the problem.
It used to be that a few years of on-the-job training or in-house training would count for a "shirt-sleeve" degree and qualify you for promotion. Now it seems that kids with no experience and a nice, shiny BA from the same schools that trained the people in charge of our financial system, are the ones the government wants.
Of course, these young-uns are easy to sell on surface ideology rather than in rubber-meets-the-road practicality.
Re: PROMOTIONS
DOD
Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:35 AM
Faster Promotions Coming for Some Federal Employee
Fed
Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:32 AM
Post Reply
Hope someone lets TSA know. Since they go bu the rules they make up and very little oversight from Congress.
Grade with Step Increases
Fl Natl Guard
Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:43 AM
Post Reply
Would be nice if something could be done for individuals in non-promotable positions, and who are maxed out in step increases given more steps to increase in, instead of being dead end.
Faster Promotions
SSA
Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:49 AM
Post Reply
I suspect that SSA will resist this. Most of our positions do not have any promotion potential past GS-11. We just don't have many with a 12/13 or 13/14 ladders. This rule change could have an impact on new hires. I believe we loose good people because we are forced to start many new hires as GS-5s for a claims rep position. The ladder is 5-7-9-11. So you can see that SSA really tries to get its money's worth out of a new hire. This means that most candidates I have interviewed take a pay cut when coming to SSA. It would be nice if we could hold out the possibility that a person might attain at least the 9 in less than two years. It might also make the trainees work harder.
Faster promotions
DOI, OS
Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:41 AM
Post Reply
This will open up a whole new can of worms. I predict it will cause more dissention in the ranks when favorites DO get promoted quicker than everyone else. I saw it my entire career (20 years in Personnel\HR). I see no solution to this as some managers have always done it and now it will be even easier to promote favorites.