Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 402
Page 3 of 40

« Previous | Next »

President Asks Federal Employees to Sacrifice in 2010: Proposes 2% Pay Raise

All we'll have left is CHANGE

Attorney
PTO
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:53 AM

Post Reply

This guy has alot of nerve. What sacrifices has he made? Why didn't he scale back his inauguration (the most expensive ever) if he is so concerned? Forget about this guy being a secret Muslim. This man is a follower of Marx. He's a communist pure and through, hellbent on spreading the wealth from those he thinks makes too much to create/sustain a class of dependent voters who will come out to vote to maintain he and his apparatchiks in power. Look at this man's life and the people he showed a fondness for in his college years and those who have played a prominent part in his life since--Wright, Ayers and Pfleger. The man brags about studying the writings of Saul Alinisky and his Rules for Radicals. I never thought I'd say this, since I thought he made alot of missteps, but I think I miss Bush.

Re: All we'll have left is CHANGE

Analyst
USDA
Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:23 AM
You said it. The biggest nerve is his wanting a new $654BILLION DOWN PAYMENT on a new health care initiative to cover folks who don't want to pay for their own healthcare and for illegal immigrants. It just does not balance with saying we ALL have to sacrifice. Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are RIGHT, Nobama and his ILK won't stop until they control everything and everyone. How to make those not so well off feel better, make more people feel worse. Spread the misery. To heck with hard work and being paid for jobs well done. If you are fortunate enough to do well despite this Stalinist, he will confiscate your property via taxation!

COMMUNIST!

Re: All we'll have left is CHANGE

Thorn in the Side
DOD
Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:33 PM
COMMUNIST! Oh, bring on the boogeyman! Why don't you people get off it. The guy's only been in office for a month.

Confusion reigns

Employee
DVA
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:54 AM

Post Reply

President Obama has now separated federal employees from the rest of the population. As a Federal employee, did I surrender my other title of civilian. The truth is he can do it to us, but he has no control over the rest of the population. Federal employees have long been utilized as "examples". I recall a survey done many years ago by OMB or OPM that claimed Federal employees were paid significantly less than their civilian counterparts. Did I sleep through the catch up part and are we now at parity?

"when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging"

Re: Confusion reigns

Diversity Manager
DOL
Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:13 PM
Yep you must have been sleeping on the job. CS earn twice what the average is in the private sector. $118K a year VS $55K

YES WE CAN

HR Specialist
A Small One
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:54 AM

Post Reply

Do you realize that as long as we (our nation) refuse to make sacrifices or do something different from what's already been done, nothing will ever change. Let's be less selfish and be part of a greater good for our nation. Everyone has to do his/her part and while, yes, there are some people who mismanage what they have, let's just do our part, and complain less. Let's give things a chance to work.

Re: YES WE CAN

Deadbeat
None
Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:04 AM
Will you give me some money? I bought a 350K house on a 30K income and can't seem to keep up with the payments. I don't understand it, but if you give me some money I will appreciate it and light a candle for you.

Re: YES WE CAN

Computer Specialist
USED
Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:13 AM
If I could believe that the "stimulis" package, the enormous budget scam, etc was actually intended to improve the economy (or even if I thought it might improve in spite of intentions) I would be glad to make some sacrafices. Since I cannot convince myself to believe such fairy tales, I will make the same sacrafice I did under Clinton. I will look for any way to reduce my personal tax burden.

Re: YES WE CAN

Computer Specialist
USED
Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:57 PM
IF I believed that this whole process was intended to help our country get through the current financial difficulties or even that would be the result regardless of the intentions, I would be glad to take a smaller (or no) increase in pay. Since I firmly believe that the purpose of all the recent "stimulus" package, giganic increases in government spending, etc. is to move our country further toward some type of socialism, I would not want to do anything to assist that. So, thanks but no thanks.

Re: YES WE CAN

Paralegal
SSA
Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:00 PM
But you forgot how this all got started in the first place and it's the fault of individuals who bought houses they couldn't afford and the banks and mortgage companies who loaned them the money. Why should there be a sacrifice on the part of the federal workers? Ask yourself that.

2010 pay increase

Revenue agent
Treasury
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:54 AM

Post Reply

Gentlemen:

In 2010 we may have $4 oil and double digit inflation and a 2% salary increase may be unreasonable. Many people don't get step increases and all they have is the cost of living adjustment. You should be asking the question will medical costs only increase by 2 %???

How soon they forget

Financial Analyst
DOD
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:55 AM

Post Reply

History is a great teacher but apparently President Obama does not want to reflect on what has happened in the past to federal employee salaries. For many years, the federal employee received paltry raises (barely enough to cover increases in health care plans, FEGLI etc) whilst the private sector counterpart enjoyed much larger raises, bonuses and stock options. Now that because of greed, they have hit rough times, the president wants us to ride the lower wave with them. It does seem unfair that in times of relative prosperity, they were not asked to give up their raises, bonuses and the like to join their fellow Americans in the federally employed sector and accept limited raises, bonuses and the like.
Its a poor political ploy and one that should not be followed. Perhaps the President should be made aware of how those who were shortchanged in the past shouuld not be subject to it again.!!!

2% payraise

QAS
DCMA
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:56 AM

Post Reply

I expected something like this from OBAMA!

All I can say is HAHAHAHA maybe now you dummies who salivated at the very mention of your "messiah"'s name can begin to understand what those of us who live in the Cook County area were trying to tell you about BHO and his background, everthing he does is an effort to make himself look good and he sure as heck does not care about you. A little less than 1420 days until the obama mistake is corrected!

Re: 2% payraise

attorney
DoD
Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:53 AM
Ah, another Northern Illinoisan! My friends also didn't understand why I was so adamant that Obama was no angel and didn't deserve the halo and wings that the general public was so anxious to give him. Anyone who believes Obama is above the political fray should read some of the articles written by John Kass (Chicago Tribune), which spell out in black and white all of Obama's connections to corrupt Illinois politics.

What a joke!

Biological Scientist
USDA - Forest Service
Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:57 AM

Post Reply

As this president sold the futures of my great grand children for pork projects, he is asking federal employees to "tighten their belts"?

If this president and congress were interested in reviving the economy, they could have forgiven ALL current student loan debt (which would have dumped $500/month from my wallet into the economy), paid off 90% of current mortgage debt (releasing $1000/month), and/or given REAL tax cuts to Americans (rather than masquerading welfare as tax cuts to slackers).

This president and congress have begun destroying the country I fought so idealistically for. Shame on the people that voted for this joke and placed the majority of absolute morons into congress & senate.

Re: What a joke!

Thorn in the Side
DOD
Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:36 PM
Is it worse to give "welfare" to the little people than to give it to fat cats?
Total Comments: 402
Page 3 of 40

« Previous | Next »

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.