Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 66
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Paid Leave, Childbirth and Federal Employee Benefits
Total Comments: 66
Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of 7
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2114 | +0.0012 | +0.70% |
| F | $13.6201 | -0.0062 | +2.14% |
| C | $13.8116 | -0.0706 | +4.49% |
| S | $17.9282 | -0.1903 | +8.91% |
| I | $18.5079 | -0.0782 | -0.16% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1968 | -0.0789 | +3.59% |
| L 2030 | $15.9593 | -0.0673 | +3.23% |
| L 2020 | $15.7365 | -0.0532 | +2.72% |
| L 2010 | $15.4595 | -0.0197 | +1.57% |
| L Income | $14.0856 | -0.0155 | +1.48% |
More benefits
USPS
Thu May 7, 2009 8:58 AM
Post Reply
One word sums it up - SOCIALISM.
Only the truly naive believe that this won't increase taxes. Obama has already gone on record freezing social security benefits for people who really need it for the next few years.
Amazing what you can pass when you are buying votes.
Re: More benefits
SSA/DOJ
Thu May 7, 2009 10:41 AM
Re: More benefits
DOE, Albuquerque
Fri May 8, 2009 8:37 AM
Re: More benefits
DOD
Mon May 11, 2009 11:16 AM
Whether it's parental leave, short-term disability, or something else, Federal Employees (and all of the US) need an option to be with their child without facing increased financial difficulties.
Additional Paid Leave for other Illnesses
Army Corp of Engineers
Thu May 7, 2009 9:03 AM
Post Reply
I really don't have a problem with the paid leave for parenting, however what about other illnesses (sudden) that can have a sever impact on the financial status of a federal employee. Unlike a lot of private firms the Government does not offer short term disabiity to its employees. Additionally, you can not even get advanced sick leave from some agencies without exhausting all of your annual leave. Which leaves you with nothing when you recover. A bill need to be introduced to address these types of situations that will allow for some type of financial relief as a result of an illness other than child birth.
Re: Additional Paid Leave for other Illnesses
DFAS
Thu May 7, 2009 10:54 AM
Eventually, we can work on joining the rest of the industrialized world in the 21st century. Baby steps. Baby steps.
Re: Additional Paid Leave for other Illnesses
Department of the Army
Fri May 8, 2009 12:20 PM
Fairness Prism
DOE
Thu May 7, 2009 9:04 AM
Post Reply
The only prism needed is that of the taxpayer. Do they see this as fair. With the amount of leave and sick time we get, it should not take that much cobbling. I call this greed. The only discrimination here is against those who pay your salaries.
uh oh
A big one
Thu May 7, 2009 9:14 AM
Post Reply
I think you guys like reporting on this as much as possible because you know it inflames people! I guess we have to get ready for all the petty whining that it is not fair for people to get what I can't get. My quick and dirty response is...get over it. Is it fair that many of you get to retire from CSRS and I have to deal with the crappy FERS...no. But guess what, I have to suck it up and deal with it. I recommend the rest of you do the same on this issue. I am a man, have 3 kids under 5 and can tell you without hesitation how much the extra 4 weeks would have benefited me and my family and made me an even more productive and happy worker.
Go Congress...I appreciate what you are doing!
Re: uh oh
Small Agency
Thu May 7, 2009 12:14 PM
Re: uh oh
DoD Agency
Thu May 7, 2009 1:00 PM
This article does not do that. Apparently a number of federal employees are against this expansion of benefits for understandable reasons. So why should the author sugar coat that and jump on the bandwagon for spending more money when many federal employees are against it. The article also gives arguments for and against the proposal by using quotes and comments.
We are used to seeing nothing but favorable articles about new programs. Some in the Post, Federal Times, etc. sometimes sound like they were written by the advocates for the programs.
Personally, I like having a different point of view than the blatant cheerleading, unquestioned restatement of union positions as if they were the universal opinion of federal employees, and an assumption that our workforce of 2 million or so thinks with one mind.
So, in this man's humble opinion, please don't fall into the usual mode of just telling us what the advocates for a particular program want to hear. Apparently, in the view of some, not jumping on the cheerleading bandwagon is "decidedly anti-federal employee." That is nonsense.
Maternity Leave
DOJ
Thu May 7, 2009 9:19 AM
Post Reply
I believe this would be a great benefit for expecting mother and to her family. Many do no have enough leave saved up to stay home for three months. Many have to return to work after only 2 weeks because they can't afford to stay longer. That is just plain selfish of those who say if I can't have it, why should they. Even the men should want there wives to have that opportunity.
Re: Maternity Leave
DOI
Thu May 7, 2009 3:59 PM
Re: Maternity Leave
IRS
Fri May 8, 2009 8:55 AM
Re: Maternity Leave
DOI
Fri May 8, 2009 10:53 AM
Anyone with a grasp of third grade English could read my comment & know that it's not the choosing to have children that is selfish, it's the expectation of extra benefits being attached that is so.
As for what I see in the mirror: a mother of 4 who didn't use one hour of federal leave for childbirth. I was in the private sector with no benefits when each was born.
Re: Maternity Leave
Department of the Army
Fri May 8, 2009 12:25 PM
Paid Leave for Child Birth
Federal Government
Thu May 7, 2009 9:22 AM
Post Reply
Paid leave for child birth is common in most of private industry abiet not in jobs such as working in stores, restaurants, etc. When I mentioned that I used my own leave, I had people who were shocked that the government did not give maternity leave. This country is behind most of the industrialized world in providing more benefits for the working family. I feel that this would be a great benefit as this is provided in many companies in the private sector.
Parental Leave needed benefit
SBA
Thu May 7, 2009 9:29 AM
Post Reply
I know some disagree with this bill, but what about those that have recently started with the Federal government and then face an unplanned pregnancy such as myself. The argument of saving leave is irrelevant. I didn't have enough time to accrue enough vacation and sick leave. Hopefully, when my child is born I will be able to make it back to work in 4 weeks because that is all the leave I will have accumulated in my time thus far with the Federal Government.