Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 86
Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of 9
« Previous | Next »
The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Total Comments: 86
Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of 9
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2033 | +0.0011 | +0.64% |
| F | $13.5947 | +0.0048 | +1.95% |
| C | $13.6927 | -0.0027 | +3.59% |
| S | $17.9723 | +0.0233 | +9.18% |
| I | $18.5302 | +0.1287 | -0.04% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1474 | +0.0291 | +3.28% |
| L 2030 | $15.9136 | +0.0249 | +2.93% |
| L 2020 | $15.6956 | +0.0208 | +2.45% |
| L 2010 | $15.4351 | +0.0080 | +1.41% |
| L Income | $14.0647 | +0.0064 | +1.33% |
Bargaining Unit Status
Retiree
Thu May 28, 2009 7:30 AM
Post Reply
Granted, only three readers here care about this but I am the fourth. I'd like this author (or anyone else for that matter) to discuss and opine the unit status of these newly hire annuitants especially in activities who have had no geezers in the past and the unit descriptions are ancient and ambiguous concerning them. For example, are they included in a unit where the description says: "All employees of activity X except those excluded by 5 USC X"? How about those unit descriptions that exclude temps on appointments for less than 120 days or less than one year? What if the new geezers are on term appointments and terms are not expressly excluded from the unit?
The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DHS
Thu May 28, 2009 7:50 AM
Post Reply
Using the word "geezer" is highly offensive, regardless of the age of the person who writes it. You would not refer to any other ethnic, religious, gender or sexual orientation group by certain familiar derogatory names. There would be howls of protest, and rightfully so! Why do you think it's OK to refer to people of retirement age by this term? Consider this my howl of protest.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
federal agency
Thu May 28, 2009 8:06 AM
In this case though, according to his bio, Mr. Orr may qualify as a "geezer." Normally, under the rules of political correctness that dominates our culture throughout the bureaucracy, that entitles him to belittle or otherwise make fun of the group or even use a disparaging name since he is a member of it.
Why are you trying to change the rules now? Besides that, his article makes a good point. Anyway, having known Mr. Orr for at least the latter years of his long federal career, he knows what he is talking about and makes his points much more effectively that most government speakers and writers.
Let's try to restore our sense of humor and not be so self-righteous and uptight.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Retired
Thu May 28, 2009 9:08 AM
It is good humor. Get over it, and while you are at it, get over your self-serving sense of importance at DHS. Worry more about why DHS is a money drain that does nothing to make Americamore secure while hurting travel and trade at the same time.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Fedsmith
Thu May 28, 2009 9:23 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Small Agency
Thu May 28, 2009 10:18 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DFAS
Thu May 28, 2009 12:51 PM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DOA
Thu May 28, 2009 6:04 PM
Sincerely,
King of the Geezers
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DFAS
Fri May 29, 2009 7:47 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DOA
Fri May 29, 2009 4:48 PM
The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DoD Inspector General
Thu May 28, 2009 7:51 AM
Post Reply
Your poor attempt at humor fell short. I never got past the title for your article. You should know better.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Fed
Thu May 28, 2009 9:50 AM
I am of retirement age with the time in to be able to retire.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Small Agency
Thu May 28, 2009 10:17 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
dod
Thu May 28, 2009 10:38 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DoD
Thu May 28, 2009 5:54 PM
Geezers, Depends, and Wheelchairs...Oh My
DOD
Thu May 28, 2009 8:39 AM
Post Reply
It is interesting that the older workforce screams bloody murder when the Government hires younger feds and promotes them quickly to fill in the retirement gaps even though they lack experience. Now the younger workforce is screaming bloody murder about the need to bring back the older workforce because the Government needs the experience that the younger workforce isn't necessarity filling quickly. Thus preventing the younger workforce from being promoted quickly. Young fresh ideas can be great, but they can also be stupid as well. Just like old ideas can sometimes stagnate an office environment. Unions don't want retirees back because they are less likely to join the Union. It is all about Money.
Re: Geezers, Depends, and Wheelchairs...Oh My
BOR
Thu May 28, 2009 9:13 AM
Re: Geezers, Depends, and Wheelchairs...Oh My
Fed
Thu May 28, 2009 9:54 AM
To answer your question-It takes more than 6 months or a year for a tax person to be effective. it takes a number of years. A good rep can eat up an inexperienced tax person.
I guess the IRS does not have enough experienced tax people to do the job. I, however, do not know this factually.
The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
USDA
Thu May 28, 2009 8:59 AM
Post Reply
If they want to contribute, check out meal on wheels or something like that. Most of the recent retirees contributed little to the mission and needed to go sit on the porch. Sorry, for the harshness but so many won't or can't get new computer skills essential to our mission and harp it was better the way we did it 30 years ago.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Fed
Thu May 28, 2009 9:57 AM
I do not have the same computer skills as my children. But I do have enough to do my job.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Small Agency
Thu May 28, 2009 10:21 AM
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
Federal Agency
Thu May 28, 2009 12:20 PM
Personally, I believe when you retire you need to retire. Let the government figure out for itself that your skills were wasted. Heck, we can all be replaced - the question is though what will you replace us old geezers with???
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
DoD
Thu May 28, 2009 5:59 PM
I'm the youngest worker on my shift by 17 years. I am also the de facto tech support.
Re: The Rehire Geezer Feds Act
USDA
Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:44 AM
How can I miss you when you NEVER leave
NorthEast
Thu May 28, 2009 9:04 AM
Post Reply
Sounds like an extension of the Secret Service double dip for all of us not able to retire under the DC Fire/Police Retirement System. Retire and move along already folks, you're blocking my opportunities to advance!
Geezer Article
DoD
Thu May 28, 2009 9:05 AM
Post Reply
I disagree with one part of the article, which is that unions represent employees. Unions represent unions and they have political agendas that have nothing to do with employees. If unions really cared about employees they would care about inproving the work environment as a whole, which means bringing anyone into the workforce who can contribute and make everyone's job a little easier. That of course will never happen because they have made deals with politicians on both sides of the fence - and politicians don't care about government employees either, unless it's election time. Am I cynical? Ater 30 years of government "service", you bet I am.
Re: Geezer Article
DOD
Thu May 28, 2009 10:00 AM
I will remember your brain numbing, defeatist sarcasm, the next time I represent someone. Thankfully, my union brothers & sisters are NOT as you describe.