Search:

Custom Search

Readers' Comments

Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1

Postal Service Ends Third Quarter with $2.4 Billion Loss

bloated management and support staff

letter carrier
USPS
Wed Aug 5, 2009 2:40 PM

Post Reply

USPS continues to curtail services and reassign workers in reaction to continuing mail volume declines.
However, the weight of multiple levels of management and support staff makes a financial turnaround a near impossibilty for the agency.
Congressional involvement seems a certainty.

Government run enterprise

IT Specialist
FLRA
Wed Aug 5, 2009 4:40 PM

Post Reply

In my mind, this is all just indicative of how well the government can run a business. What's frightening is now the government is running GM and Chrysler and also wants to run health care. That should all go over really well.

Re: Government run enterprise

Procurement Specialist
Dept. of Army
Thu Aug 6, 2009 6:23 AM
How about they fix it with another postage increase? That'll make it all better.

Re: Government run enterprise

Engineer
FAA
Thu Aug 6, 2009 11:59 AM
I agree with the IT specialist at the FLRA. Any government run business, agency, or department should be shut down due to inefficiency. They are obviously a waste of taxpayer recources.

Let's begin by shutting down agencies, and getting rid of employees. How about we start with the FLRA. It's run by the government, and thus a complete waste.

Yes, However

Union Activist
Postal Service
Thu Aug 6, 2009 6:37 AM

Post Reply

That loud SUCKING SOUND,
Is still the VPs and District offices are getting bonuses, free cars, gas cards. Not to mention closing neighborhood Post Offices while maintaining high rent Corp. offices and super slueth toys for the overpaid security guard Inspectors...

Re: Yes, However

SCS
USPS
Thu Aug 6, 2009 5:14 PM
WOW!! That was clearly a well thought out not to mention inteligent and provocative view point... I would just go with the thumbs in your ears waving your hands back and forth singing nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah nyaahhh. It has a more direct impact and produces better results. Typical union fashion to blame and misdirect rather than address the issue at the true core of the situation. No no, I hear you... it's all managements fault. Always is in such cases like this. Poor direction (reducing overhead costs by nearly 3 billion dollars), bad leadership(freezing pay at the 2008 salaries for all executives), blatent disregard for workers(securing t the future feasibility of your jobs), etc. Yes, I hear you... discusting the way they just fritter the days away allowing the Postal Service to continue on in such fashion. Alas you may not have to endure it much longer though. If congress does not do something quickly we will be regulated to unsolvency and dismantled. Breathe easy...

give them a day off

MAILCARRIER wife
irs
Thu Aug 6, 2009 10:39 AM

Post Reply

Nobody really cares if they take a day off. All the other government agencies only work a 5 day week.
Give them saturdays off so they can spend time with their families.
There has been a hiring freeze at the post office for years. These people often work 10 hour days just to get the mail delivered. Managment thinks it is cheaper to pay over time then to hire and pay benefits.
What a waste.
Pay unemployment to somebody instead.
So many places they could cut costs without cutting services. But then again, congress tells them what they can and cant do........nuff said.

Government run enterprise

Analyst
DOD
Thu Aug 6, 2009 1:53 PM

Post Reply

So, anybody out there suprised???

What do have when a GOVT controls it`s People

Retired
Retired
Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:29 AM

Post Reply

Raising the cost is a mistake. Cut the FAT.. more contract labor. Make those on WELFARE walk and deliver Mail, seeing that they want to live off the Govt..let them be the solution...
bet they would get a job overnight. SHUT DOWN USPS as there so called on time delivery SUX bigtime. the online tracking Dept. needs to be fired ASAP. tracking is non existant,, try it I dare you.. 3 to 7 days after delivery then it shows up online.. I for one see a dictatorship right around the corner. WE THE PEOPLE are now cowards in the corner..

Causes of the Loss

Paralegal Specialist
USPS
Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:40 AM

Post Reply

The loss was caused by a combination of the following factors: (1). the long-term decline in mail volume caused by the shift to electronic communications media; (2). the short-term decline in mail volume cause by the economic crisis; (3). last year's high energy costs; a 1-cent increase in the cost of gasoline costs USPS 8 million dollars, due to the size -- 200,000+ -- of our fleet; and (4). the 2006 law requiring USPS to permanently prefund all of its future retiree health benefit cost within a mere 10 years. This last requirement is unprecedented; no entity has never been subject to such a draconian measure. Without it, we would have been profitable the past 2 years, instead of taking huge losses. We are the only agency that generates large revenues, and Congress views us as a cash cow; they required us to create this huge fund to hide some of their other spending. There are bills pending to correct this. Meanwhile, we have managed to keep service high and prices low.

Re: Causes of the Loss

Mail handlers wife
USPS wife
Mon Oct 5, 2009 8:24 AM
Thanks for bringing some facts to the debate. No doubt some posters will find it a bore. (Monkeys also love to sling mud; they rarely read, either. We must live with them in our midst).
What I don't understand is that at my husband's office, they eliminated nearly all the jobs on day shift and moved everyone to overnights. This is the most expensive shift. It has ruined our family life (after 21 years, we were hoping he might get a weekend day off in the next few years--now he has overnights with Tuesdays and Wednesdays off). That's fine; it's the job. But it costs the PO more this way. And now they're bringing people from the night shift in on overtime to cover the empty day shift. Plus, for the first time, the office is beginning to fall behind on its quotas. So where are they saving? It seems like they're just trying to make people miserable so they'll leave, and cheaper workers can come in in the future.
Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1

Add a Comment about this Article

** All fields are required.
Note: Your comments will not show up right away. FedSmith.com selects the most insightful comments from our readers for posting. If selected, your comments will show up in the comments section after they have been reviewed and approved. See our terms of use for more information.