Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 21
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Satisfying America's Creditors: Issuing More TIPS to Soothe China's Concerns
Total Comments: 21
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2114 | +0.0012 | +0.70% |
| F | $13.6201 | -0.0062 | +2.14% |
| C | $13.8116 | -0.0706 | +4.49% |
| S | $17.9282 | -0.1903 | +8.91% |
| I | $18.5079 | -0.0782 | -0.16% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1968 | -0.0789 | +3.59% |
| L 2030 | $15.9593 | -0.0673 | +3.23% |
| L 2020 | $15.7365 | -0.0532 | +2.72% |
| L 2010 | $15.4595 | -0.0197 | +1.57% |
| L Income | $14.0856 | -0.0155 | +1.48% |
« Previous | Next »
Satisfying America's Creditors: Issuing More TIPS to Soothe China's Concerns
« Previous | Next »
Why Haven't you mentioned I Bonds?
Retired from NAVSEA field office
Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:43 AM
Post Reply
Why not invest in I Bonds as a protecton against inflation? I believe they are indexed to inflaton and will probably offer a better return on investment that the G Fund.
Re: Why Haven't you mentioned I Bonds?
USPS
Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:15 PM
If it isn't a mistake, instead, then I must commend you for exposing Fedsmith's readers to something as controversial as an economics Nobel prize winner!
History or Leverage
CBP
Thu Oct 1, 2009 10:52 AM
Post Reply
Hey people don't forget what US did to UK during the conflict for control of the Suez Canal in 1956. USA did not wanted to get involved and needed support from UK but UK decided to get involve anyway and with them they dragged France. At the time UK owned a large amount of bonds and President Eisenhower threatened the prime minister to liquidate the debt. The result?? England pulled out. Do you think the Chinese don’t know how to use their pieces?