Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 10
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Postal Service Searches for Ways to Stabilize Costs and Shrinking Mail Volume
Total Comments: 10
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.2068 | +0.0035 | +0.67% |
| F | $13.6034 | +0.0087 | +2.02% |
| C | $13.6990 | +0.0063 | +3.64% |
| S | $17.9053 | -0.0670 | +8.77% |
| I | $18.3571 | -0.1731 | -0.97% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $16.1066 | -0.0408 | +3.02% |
| L 2030 | $15.8797 | -0.0339 | +2.71% |
| L 2020 | $15.6688 | -0.0268 | +2.28% |
| L 2010 | $15.4289 | -0.0062 | +1.37% |
| L Income | $14.0606 | -0.0041 | +1.30% |
Postal Service Searches for Ways to Stabilize Costs and Shrinking Mail Volume
The Worst of Both Worlds
FED
Wed Sep 9, 2009 12:16 PM
Post Reply
The PS is often criticized by the RWNs of this country and held up as an example of failed govt.
But if they receive no taxpayer funding, do they also get the tax breaks and writeoffs that FEDEX and USPS get? I suspect not. So if they need to shut down PO's on Saturdays like USPS and FEDEX do, then do it. Quit with the studies. Let them fully compete as a non-profit corporation if they are still to be a govt. entity. It is so ironic and sad to see a FEDEX box at the entrance to many Post Offices. It must be an insult to the postal workers.
Postal Service Weekend Shutdowns
Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Wed Sep 9, 2009 3:53 PM
Post Reply
The postal service should be able to close on the weekends, if the mail volume does not warrant the expense. However, if the businesses who generate bills do not change their billing practices, it would seem that the citizens who need the PS services will not have these services available to them. They will be the ones who get charged late fees for payments that didn't get to the correct destinatons before the deadlines. Whether anyone has noticed or not, bills are late on Sundays and holidays now, even when accounting departments are not even open to receive the mail. Even after the mail reaches its destination, who knows when the mail is processed. This means that the person mailing must not only pay attention to the amount he owes, but also to the calendar to determine the date as well as the time a late fee will be charged. It seems that businesses no longer give the same amount of time between the billing date and the payment deadline.
Re: Postal Service Weekend Shutdowns
Fed
Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:07 AM
Re: Postal Service Weekend Shutdowns
irs
Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:54 PM
USPS
Treasury
Wed Sep 9, 2009 7:13 PM
Post Reply
If the volume of mail is decreasing by ~ 10% ( 20 billion less mailing out of 195 Billion ) then simply raise the cost of sending mail by 10 % ( or 5 cents ) Heck, let's increase liquidity even more and raise the price of sending something by 20% - or a dime more for a letter.
Personally I could care less if I received mail. Like many in this country I am to blame for this trend, since I pay bills online and send emails and text messages instead of letters through the USPS. I also seem to remember the price of a stamp going up a few years ago, with the post office saying that the increase would keep them financially intact for some years to come ... seems the entire concept of paper mail, etc. is a dinosaur anyway which is slowly becoming extinct ( Do you think USPS will be around in 10 years ? )
Are you kidding me?
USPS
Wed Sep 9, 2009 8:24 PM
Post Reply
Way too little too late. 3200 closures minimum. 25K buyout in lieu of 15K to stimulate retirement. 5 day delivery an absolute necessity. Unions should give back ALL negotiated pay hikes under existing contract, and agree to NO future pay hikes or COLA's (moot anyways for the next 2-3 years) in future negotiations UNTIL the USPS breaks even. Probably way too late to save this country's bail out mentality anyways, but it's worth at least a try. Base any and all future pay raises on the profitability of the post office. Reduce number of managers to be in line with best run private corporations, if there is such a thing left. Reduce health benefit allowance to rest of government employees, approximately 70%. If ALL of these meaningful cuts are not adopted, then the taxpayers will continue to bail out the post office in perpetuity. I'm sure the unions will agree to none of these cuts. Why even bother to give input. Where is a good benevolent dictator when you need one?
Re: Are you kidding me?
USPS
Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:41 AM
Postal Service Closing Stations
Forest Service
Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 AM
Post Reply
Of course the Postal Service only admits to the obvious reasons for why their revenues are dropping. Their stated delivery times are not reliable. I have better luck sending packages and "overnight" (Express, or whatever name you use) mail via FedEx and sometimes UPS. The stated delivery times of these service are much more dependable, and to many locations, are cheaper. price is not the only reason to use another carrier; dependability ranks higher in my book. I believe many other folks are aware of this also, and the effect of everyone using the various other commercial carriers must have an impact on the total revenue of the USPS.
Postal Change Choices
DCMA
Fri Oct 2, 2009 10:10 AM
Post Reply
All this talk about reducing services to meet demand are not new, but any options being looked at are also not new. Why not consider an alternate three-day delivery to residential customers? A Monday/Wednesday/Friday with the alternate Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday delivery schedule would allow immense coverage without reducing services. Allowing businesses to continue six-day delivery at a premium is cost effective. Many new postal customers opt for electronic mail in lieu of Snail Mail anyway so this would only require a short phase-in period that would most likely show the cost benefits and alleviate the concerns of elderly customers who have always had daily service.
Reducing postal costs
DoD
Tue Oct 6, 2009 2:56 AM
Post Reply
The USPS can stop whining about rising costs and start reducing costs by eliminating the fat bonuses that were recently given to upper management officials.
You can't cry about rising costs if you can afford exhorbitant bonuses! Shame on you!