Readers' Comments
Total Comments: 35
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3
« Previous | Next »
Working After Retiring From Government: Plan in Advance for a Potential Tax Hit
Total Comments: 35
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3
« Previous | Next »
Free Email Newsletter
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| G | $13.3609 | +0.0019 | +1.84% |
| F | $14.2053 | +0.0462 | +6.53% |
| C | $13.2035 | +0.0008 | -0.11% |
| S | $17.4727 | +0.0439 | +6.15% |
| I | $17.6449 | -0.1281 | -4.81% |
| Close | Change | YTD | |
| L 2040 | $15.7814 | -0.0140 | +0.94% |
| L 2030 | $15.6316 | -0.0119 | +1.11% |
| L 2020 | $15.5072 | -0.0103 | +1.22% |
| L 2010 | $15.4959 | +0.0004 | +1.81% |
| L Income | $14.1434 | +0.0004 | +1.89% |
Beware of Social Security
DOE
Tue Feb 2, 2010 7:20 AM
Post Reply
If you are a retired civil service, you will also pay 7.625% in social security which in most cases is just another tax. Most SC retirees have offsets so you will never collect a dime. Thats why I will never work even though i am 56 in good health.
Re: Beware of Social Security
fed
Tue Feb 2, 2010 8:26 AM
If you are FERS and in your fifties you are not collecting a $30000 pension on a $50000 salary. Your benefits under FERS at age 56 or 57 with 30 years in is 1% times years served. FERS also started in early to mid 80's so the theory is not accurate. The author probably means CERS.
to Accountant retired,
You are partially right. You will not get your wife's social security benefit as your pension benefit is probably too high. You will not get the top social security benefit at 90% unless you worked under social security for 30 years. if you worked under social security for 20 years or less, you will get 40% in the top tier. Between 20 and 30 years that top tier increases. See social security for details.
Thank Ronald Reagan for this removal of a benefit.
Re: Beware of Social Security
IRS
Tue Feb 2, 2010 9:34 AM
I'm getting ready to retire and of course, want to do the right thing to cover my income.
Re: Beware of Social Security
DOE
Tue Feb 2, 2010 11:30 AM
Re: Beware of Social Security
IRS
Tue Feb 2, 2010 11:52 AM
Re: Beware of Social Security
DOE
Tue Feb 2, 2010 2:41 PM
You are wrong. I just recived counseling from Social security and My HR. There are two offsets for CSRS. One is the spousal offset and the other is the pension offset. I went to a DOE sponsored retirement seminar and several people freaked out whenthey found out
Re: Beware of Social Security
DOE
Tue Feb 2, 2010 8:34 PM
You are sorely mistaken! Barry is indeed correct. You must be the one who is spreading all the erroneous information and causing people to panic needlessly. Get your facts straight.
Re: Beware of Social Security
USDA-forest service
Tue Feb 2, 2010 8:42 PM
Re: Beware of Social Security
fed
Tue Feb 2, 2010 10:18 PM
I will try to clarify.
There are two issues here. One is an offset against spousal social security. A percentage of your pension goes against your part of the social security earned by your spouse. Barry is right on this one. If your pension is $48000 and your social security benefit from your spouse is $24000 you get nothing.
The other deals with social security earned by you. If you earn material salaries paying social security taxes for 20 years or less the first tier benefit is 40%. If you earn material salaries paying social security taxes for 30 years or more that tier will be 90%. Each year going from 21-30 increases the first tier by 5% until you reach 90%.
Please note that this assumes you earn a pension whose salary was not covered by social security. I am not sure of all of the details on this issue so I will ask someone from social security to contribute to this issue.
Re: Beware of Social Security
USDA-forest service
Mon Feb 8, 2010 11:27 AM
We'll FInd Out
None
Tue Feb 2, 2010 7:37 AM
Post Reply
This will be my first year filing with pension bennies. I'd never heard of this effect from friends who have gone before me...we'll find out soon enough.
Re: We'll FInd Out
DOD
Tue Feb 2, 2010 1:49 PM
the article
SEC
Tue Feb 2, 2010 8:38 AM
Post Reply
what about part-time at a lower paying job??
Is this just for FERS
Navy
Tue Feb 2, 2010 10:17 AM
Post Reply
The example is for FERS; I'm assuming there is something different for CSRS or is it the same situation?
Re: Is this just for FERS
Dept. of the Interior
Tue Feb 2, 2010 7:16 PM
Surprise on taxes
Navy
Tue Feb 2, 2010 10:32 AM
Post Reply
I started my pension last year (FERS/CSRS mixed) in Feb. and was surprised when I calculated my taxes in Jan 10 and found out that I'll owe an additional $5K. I have continued to work in a good contractor job, making about 80% of what I had made as civil service. I didn't know about the W-4P, and if I had, I would have changed my withholding appropriately. Gonna work for another year and half, so I have changed the withholding for now on OPM's site, which worked well.
Re: Surprise on taxes
Surface Deployment & Distribution Command, Ft Eustis, VA
Fri Feb 5, 2010 6:03 PM
Re: Surprise on taxes
Navy
Mon Feb 8, 2010 1:34 PM
Beware bof social Security
SSA
Tue Feb 2, 2010 11:01 AM
Post Reply
paying social security taxes will yield a social security pension. It will not be as much as one without a pension based on their own work not covered under socuial security. It is called WEP (Windfall Elimination Provision)
Re: Beware bof social Security
DOE
Tue Feb 2, 2010 11:42 AM
Re: Beware bof social Security
tea party
Tue Feb 2, 2010 2:58 PM
You are a veritable storehouse of misinformation! Barry from IRS and MSS from SSA are correct. The applicable law is the winfall elimination provision. Perhaps you may not get SSA benefits, but the rest of us who qualify with at least 40 SSA credits will get a reduced benefit.
Re: Beware bof social Security
any
Tue Feb 2, 2010 3:36 PM
Re: Beware bof social Security
SSA
Tue Feb 2, 2010 4:03 PM
Accuracy
DOD
Tue Feb 2, 2010 11:36 AM
Post Reply
You talk about working with FERS employees and note a retiree who was making $50K and retired with a $30K pension. Please make your article realistic. To get at $30K pension with a high three of $50K, you would need to work over 54 years. If you subject started work at 18, they would still be at least 72 and I would bet not have many opportunities to get a $50K job in the private sector. Your example sounds much more like a CSRS retirement.